The journey from there to here

I have asserted it before, but I thought this holiday season would be a perfect time to dissect why the attitude of Charles Dickens' notorious central character in A Christmas Carol, Ebenezer Scrooge, more closely resembles the American left than he does conservatives, and why the book is a lesson against the liberal mentality that currently pervades our society.

At the beginning of the book, Scrooge is approached by gentlemen collecting for charity for the Christmas season. Scrooge vehemently detests the idea, insisting that he has already paid his taxes to support the orphanages and poorhouses (implying, obviously, that he has done his duty). When informed that many would rather die than go to the poorhouses, Scrooge insists that they should, thus decreasing the surplus population, a decree eerily prescient of the mentality that would be expressed decades later by Planned Parenthood founder and eugenist Margaret Sanger, an icon of the left.

There's a temptation to point at Scrooge's working conditions and insist that he is a "capitalist", but again, a closer inspection is in order. You see, Scrooge's firm was not a UNION shop, and thus, without a mandate from the collective bargaining of his employees, he was not obligated to give beyond the bare minimum. And so he gave as little as possible.

When the Ghost of Christmas Past took Scrooge back in time, he revisited his youth and the shop of his mentor, Fezziwig, who threw lavish Christmas parties and celebrated the accomplishments of his employments, without government mandates to force him in that direction.

Over the course of the novel, Scrooge realizes the error of his ways, and sees that he IS his brother's keeper, and should not rely solely on what the government MANDATES for him to run his business. Instead of going to the Parliament and lobbying for changes in labor laws, he changes his heart and gives generously to those for whom he is financially responsible by being their employer. He does not demand worker reform for others, but realizes that the change must be made in his OWN heart, and among those with which he makes contact.

Although Ebenezer Scrooge is a fictional character, the story A Christmas Carol is a strong moral play outlining the personal responsibilities we have to make the world a better place and eschewing the Marxist philosophy of government-as-caretaker. The fictional Scrooge learned his lesson that storied Christmas, and I'm hoping a few fence sitting libs might read this piece and learn theirs too.


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Dec 01, 2005
I gotta say Gid, I think you're definitely reaching with this one... Especially with the whole government mandate bit. The extent of any MENTION of government pretty much ends when he says he has already paid his taxes (his due to society) that go to fund the poor programs. You're taking one sentence and trying to stretch it as a theme over the entire story, and that just doesn't work.

It's a character driven story where things like government, or even the poor programs or actual taxes are largely irrellevant. It's about a stingy old man who couldn't give a damn about those around him until he realizes that the result is a miserable life that is ultimately forgotten (and gladly!).

Not everything is a subtle message against liberalism/marxism/communism/whatever. Sometimes a story is a story.
on Dec 01, 2005

zoomba,

Yes, a story is a story. You're right. But I was raised in the belief that Scrooge was characteristic of the American RIGHT, and I bought that lie until I looked closer. Scrooge doesn't PERFECTLY match either ideology, but his behaviour is far more characteristic of the mentality of the LEFT than of the right.

I don't believe I'm reaching with ANY of it. And if you don't believe the remark about decreasing the surplus population by allowing the poor to die is characteristic of leftist ideals, you haven't read up on Margaret Sanger very much. The left has NEVER attempted to distance itself from Sanger's ideology, but, when pressed, have always acted as APOLOGISTS for her statements (I already detailed the evidence of Sanger's ideology, and it can be found easily with a google search).

on Dec 01, 2005
Quaint analogy but Zoomba says it is strained beyond recognition. btw, would you prefer that planned parenthood reneged and pushed for throwing children into poorhouses?
on Dec 01, 2005

steven,

I'd rather that liberals were HONEST about PP.

And no, I don't think it's strained beyond recognition. Most liberals would, I'm sure...but you have to remember those are the same liberals that have cast CONSERVATIVES as Scrooge for many years. They don't like it, of course, to see the shoe on the other foot.

on Dec 01, 2005

Not everything is a subtle message against liberalism/marxism/communism/whatever. Sometimes a story is a story.

And sometimes a cigar is just a good smoke!  But I like the way Gideon uses the story.  There are parallels to the left and right, but the part he choses is indicative of the left mentality and the reason so many of the left leadership are so stingy as well.  They pay their taxes, let the government care for them.  And his treatment of Bob Cratchit is right out of the Michael Moore playbook.

on Dec 01, 2005
As one who watched all but two private organizations drop me from the "aid" after Social Security kicked in, I kind of agree with your point here.

The whole attitude of the private organizations was... "You have Social Security, we don't consider you 'needy' anymore".

They weren't that far off your assessment of Scrooge. As long as there was a government solution to my family's situation, why should they do any more?

((((The ironic part was, for some of those organizations, putting in for Social Security benefits was a requirement for their aid))))
on Dec 01, 2005
Notice also that Scrooge's transformation was a personal, spiritual transformation, rather than a political or intellectual transformation. In the end, it was the "host" that touched his deepest heart and prompted him to become a better man, rather than any political ideology or intellectual harangue.
on Dec 01, 2005
dammit. there goes my article explaining how 'oliver twist' is really about nclb.
on Dec 01, 2005
Yeah, it's just like a greedy, lying, theiving, Liberal corporate pig to have a lavish lifestyle.
on Dec 01, 2005
dammit. there goes my article explaining how 'oliver twist' is really about nclb.


Nah, Kingbee, you just link to it and give "inspirational kudos" ;~D
on Dec 01, 2005
It's not a charitable excercise for people who know how to dodge taxes to beg for more taxes. excellent piece, Gid. That is what we hear from Democrats all the time. Stars and corrupt politicians, stuffed with wealth screaming for the state to take on their charity. What they want is a system wherein they can hide their cash, let suckers pay taxes, and no one needs to have real charity.
on Dec 01, 2005
Yeah, it's just like a greedy, lying, theiving, Liberal corporate pig to have a lavish lifestyle. 


Have you ever read A Christmas Carol? Forget that -- have you ever seen a movie version of A Christmas Carol? There is nothing lavish about Scrooge's lifestyle. He's so stingy he won't even spend money on himself. His house -- actually Marley's house -- is a wreck. He lives pretty much only in the one bedroom. Anything lavish in there, probably even those clothes that get pawned off, belonged to Marley.


That not withstanding, I disagree with the article and think Zoomba is right in characterizing it as reaching. Maybe you're right, but you just didn't make the case. A lot more examples and maybe some elaboration of the "Ebenezer is a Conservative!" position your are attempting to counteract would help.

And I really don't feel like using Google to support your argument. You should have thrown in a couple of quotes to support your contention. I reached that point and thought, "Well, what the hell did she say?" Using Google to try and find quotes by some woman and decide if they matched your reading of Scrooge seemed like too much work to bother.

Seriously, look up your own article, pull a couple of quotes and throw them in.

(I'm not being harsh. You wouldn't want to hear the reaming an editor would give him for trying to get away with that. Take it from someone who's been drilled a new one by editors more than once.)


((((The ironic part was, for some of those organizations, putting in for Social Security benefits was a requirement for their aid))))


Of course! They want to get you off their rolls as quickly as possible and move on to the next person who "really needs help." Bleh.
on Dec 01, 2005
Yeah, it's just like a greedy, lying, theiving, Liberal corporate pig to have a lavish lifestyle.


Yea, sounds like Mikey moore, dont it.
on Dec 02, 2005

And I really don't feel like using Google to support your argument. You should have thrown in a couple of quotes to support your contention. I reached that point and thought, "Well, what the hell did she say?" Using Google to try and find quotes by some woman and decide if they matched your reading of Scrooge seemed like too much work to bother.

Gene,

I already did an at length article some time ago about Margaret Sanger's platform as a eugenist. And I have referenced that repeatedly. But I will take some heat for not including the quotes, which I would definitely have done if it were a more lengthy, scholarly piece. But I still don't feel I am stretching at all.

I am tired of the annual characterization of conservatives as "Scrooges" when a fair analysis of conservative values can show there is nothing further from the truth (in the recent studies on giving as a percentage of one's available income, the TOP 25 states in the survey were RED states; 9 of the 10 stingiest states were blue states). While conservatives could certainly afford to give more, the finger's often being pointed by hypocritical liberals who attempt to wrest others' money from their wallets rather than be personally responsible for giving.

There's no "black and white" characterization of Scrooge as liberal OR conservative within the context of the story, I will grant you. But there's far more resemblance in attitude to the American left than to the right.

on Dec 02, 2005
in the recent studies on giving as a percentage of one's available income, the TOP 25 states in the survey were RED states; 9 of the 10 stingiest states were blue states).


All that means is that the people in the red states are itemizing their taxes and getting credit for their deductions. I donate loads--but I don't itemize my taxes, so I would come up as a zero in your survey. I also happen to be a liberal hailing from a blue state. So I could turn your theory on you and say that conservatives want credit for their "charitable donations" where as liberals do not.

That's actually less of a reach than this article.
2 Pages1 2