The journey from there to here

I have asserted it before, but I thought this holiday season would be a perfect time to dissect why the attitude of Charles Dickens' notorious central character in A Christmas Carol, Ebenezer Scrooge, more closely resembles the American left than he does conservatives, and why the book is a lesson against the liberal mentality that currently pervades our society.

At the beginning of the book, Scrooge is approached by gentlemen collecting for charity for the Christmas season. Scrooge vehemently detests the idea, insisting that he has already paid his taxes to support the orphanages and poorhouses (implying, obviously, that he has done his duty). When informed that many would rather die than go to the poorhouses, Scrooge insists that they should, thus decreasing the surplus population, a decree eerily prescient of the mentality that would be expressed decades later by Planned Parenthood founder and eugenist Margaret Sanger, an icon of the left.

There's a temptation to point at Scrooge's working conditions and insist that he is a "capitalist", but again, a closer inspection is in order. You see, Scrooge's firm was not a UNION shop, and thus, without a mandate from the collective bargaining of his employees, he was not obligated to give beyond the bare minimum. And so he gave as little as possible.

When the Ghost of Christmas Past took Scrooge back in time, he revisited his youth and the shop of his mentor, Fezziwig, who threw lavish Christmas parties and celebrated the accomplishments of his employments, without government mandates to force him in that direction.

Over the course of the novel, Scrooge realizes the error of his ways, and sees that he IS his brother's keeper, and should not rely solely on what the government MANDATES for him to run his business. Instead of going to the Parliament and lobbying for changes in labor laws, he changes his heart and gives generously to those for whom he is financially responsible by being their employer. He does not demand worker reform for others, but realizes that the change must be made in his OWN heart, and among those with which he makes contact.

Although Ebenezer Scrooge is a fictional character, the story A Christmas Carol is a strong moral play outlining the personal responsibilities we have to make the world a better place and eschewing the Marxist philosophy of government-as-caretaker. The fictional Scrooge learned his lesson that storied Christmas, and I'm hoping a few fence sitting libs might read this piece and learn theirs too.


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Dec 02, 2005

All that means is that the people in the red states are itemizing their taxes and getting credit for their deductions. I donate loads--but I don't itemize my taxes, so I would come up as a zero in your survey.

There would be zeros in all states.  But the fact that the Northeast is the stingiest is not a matter of not itemizing as they are also the highest state tax states, and that alone lets them itemize, even without a mortgage (altho home ownership is as high in those states as the rest of the nation).

on Dec 02, 2005

ask and ye shall receive, Gene...

"The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."
Margaret Sanger (editor). The Woman Rebel, Volume I, Number 1. Reprinted in Woman and the New Race. New York: Brentanos Publishers, 1922.


"Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race."
Margaret Sanger. Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12.

"Eugenic sterilization is an urgent need ... We must prevent multiplication of this bad stock."
Margaret Sanger, April 1933 Birth Control Review.


"Eugenics is … the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems.
Margaret Sanger. "The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda." Birth Control Review, October 1921, page 5.

"Give dysgenic groups [people with 'bad genes'] in our population their choice of segregation or [compulsory] sterilization."
Margaret Sanger, April 1932 Birth Control Review.

 

on Dec 02, 2005
But the fact that the Northeast is the stingiest is not a matter of not itemizing as they are also the highest state tax states, and that alone lets them itemize, even without a mortgage


According the US Government, approximately 60% of the population does not itemize their taxes. The study is flawed. I know you don't like the Northeast, Dr. Guy, but having lived there, I can tell you that we aren't "stingy."

By the way, isn't the itemizing of state taxes relatively new? Regardless, I don't itemize my taxes and don't plan to, but I am a far cry from stingy.
on Dec 02, 2005

By the way, isn't the itemizing of state taxes relatively new?

It is at least 30 years old.  That is how long I have been doing taxes!

And on an individual basis, no one is saying that any one person is stingy.  Only that as per capita, the NE gives less.  No one said they did not give at all.

on Dec 02, 2005
It is at least 30 years old.


Really? I could have sworn it was a new thing in 2003...they made a big deal about it an everything. Perhaps we are talking about two different things? Anyway.

The study is flawed for a number of reasons. The first being that not everyone itemizes their taxes. The second being that it does not take into consideration any nonmonetary donation (if you volunteer five hours a week at a shelter, according to this study, you do the big FA--it counts for zilch).

I'm tired of hearing how stingy liberals are, and how all we do is try to get money from others while doing nothing ourselves. If you all spent as much time volunteering at a shelter as you do whining about liberals, the world would be a much more productive place, dontcha think?
2 Pages1 2