The journey from there to here
Published on November 13, 2005 By Gideon MacLeish In Politics

I read the latest tripe about Bush's alleged string pulling to get into (and out of) the National Guard during the Vietnam era. Read it, dismissed it, and walked away with a more solid resolve not to give my vote to the types of people who waste my time dragging red herrings like this out repeatedly in an order to embarass the party in power.

You see, they're sending a clear message: that their PARTY, not the country, is what's truly important, and that they will abandon all ethics in advancing the cause of their party.

The Democrats, it seems, feel they are OWED an impeachment. And there are some among them who've shown themselves willing to forge documents in order to attempt to obtain it (even though those documents, even if they were true, have absolutely ZERO to do with Bush's ability or inability to lead the nation more than 30 years after the fact...but I digress). An eye for an eye, an impeachment for an impeachment seems to be the rule of the day. Their attempt to subvert the Democratic process by winning in courts rather than in the polls is extending beyond the arena of legislation and into the arena of elected officials.

In 2004, John Kerry inherited a winnable race. Though George W. Bush held solid approval numbers, those numbers were by no means insurmountable (don't believe me? Look at Papa Bush's numbers a year before the '92 elections). But in John Kerry's campaign, what was clearly missing in most of the advertisements, was any sign of an agenda, a platform behind which we could rally. John Kerry's entire campaign could have been summed up with the slogan "I don't suck as bad as my opponent".

One year after the election, Bush's detractors haven't let up. They are trying to shape public opinion into casting Bush as an evil dictator because of some of his actions (which, even if true, could easily be chalked up as the actions of a spoiled youth who wanted to avoid war as badly as did millions of other young American males at the time). Because they've failed in their attempt to defeat him in the legislature, they're taking the war to the media, hoping the American public will chase this red herring all the way away from the Democrats' own ineptitude.

And many of the left, at least, are falling for it.

Me, I'm sick of it. The American left has demonstrated why I abandoned the left and have no intention of looking back FAR better than I EVER could.

I suppose, then, I owe them a thanks for that much.


Comments (Page 1)
4 Pages1 2 3  Last
on Nov 13, 2005
The only thing the Dem's constant tar-n-feather attempts and fabrications do is make me NOT want to vote for them. IMO at this time, the constantly whining Dems are the Republican's best asset.
on Nov 13, 2005
Kerry lost for the same reason Bob Dole lost to Clinton. No message or campaign that swayed anyone to vote for him. The democrats need to wake up and start standing for something, or they will continue to fall on their faces. I wonder how much longer they are going to run against a President who cannot run again?

I notice Colon Gangrene has jumped back on the Texas National Guard bandwagon. Pretty piss poor a thing for him to do considering the fact that every vet can think of more than a few people they served with who they wouldn't support if running for president... and if they were honest (which I'm sure the colon is incapable of being any longer) they would be able to think of a few who they would campaign against.
on Nov 13, 2005
>Me, I'm sick of it. The American left has demonstrated why I abandoned the left and have no intention of looking back FAR
>better than I EVER could.

Whatever man.
This isnt about the gutless spineless hypocrites called DEMOCRATS

Its about the most corrupt and treasonous administration (REGIME) since the founding fathers set things up.
We need a third party with guts.

33% still approve of him ... the terry schiavo types
but 53% favor impeachment

LETS MOVE THAT ALONG ... THERES AT LEAST 3 MAJOR CRIMES HE CAN BE IMPEACHED FOR
GET HIM OUT
NOW
on Nov 13, 2005
This is a much larger tactic, called "Lying for truth". I believe devoutly that the political individuals who keep rehashing old lies over and over and over do so because they know anything that people hear enough they believe, whether it is true or not. Eventually the people who know it not to be true get tired, and the liars on their soapboxes stay out there day and night preaching to the idiots.

Rombios, deal with your own nation's politics, you know little about ours other than the paranoia that we are out to get you.

on Nov 14, 2005
>Rombios, deal with your own nation's politics, you know little about ours other than the paranoia that we
>are out to get you.

What the hell are you talking about (your own "nation's" politics)?

on Nov 14, 2005
This is a much larger tactic, called "Lying for truth". I believe devoutly that the political individuals who keep rehashing old lies over and over and over do so because they know anything that people hear enough they believe, whether it is true or not.


Just keep repeating this lie over and over and eventually people will believe it.
on Nov 14, 2005

Just keep repeating this lie over and over and eventually people will believe it.

It is not a lie.  For proof, just look at how the MSM portrays the Economy, and the consumer confidence index.

on Nov 14, 2005
THERES AT LEAST 3 MAJOR CRIMES HE CAN BE IMPEACHED FOR
GET HIM OUT


Please list those 3 with documentable proof for each one.
on Nov 14, 2005
If a lie is repeated long enough it becomes the truth, that is their goal to continually repeat the same lies over and over, and sooner or later people will come around and believe it.
on Nov 14, 2005

If a lie is repeated long enough it becomes the truth, that is their goal to continually repeat the same lies over and over, and sooner or later people will come around and believe it.

Exactly!  That is why col Klink is such a one trick pony!  he figures if he keeps lying long enough, others will believe him.

on Nov 14, 2005
Exactly! That is why col Klink is such a one trick pony! he figures if he keeps lying long enough, others will believe him.


Ahhh, I see. So he's the one lying and you're the one telling the truth. And this is based on.....ah...umm....wait a minute, I know this....um....no, no don't tell me......uhhh....
....Oh right, he's lying because you say he is and you're telling the truth because you say you are. Makes perfect sense now. LOL
on Nov 14, 2005
Ahhh, I see. So he's the one lying and you're the one telling the truth. And this is based on.....ah...umm....wait a minute, I know this....um....no, no don't tell me......uhhh....
....Oh right, he's lying because you say he is and you're telling the truth because you say you are. Makes perfect sense now. LOL


Want to check the facts? Not the lies. Let's do that.
on Nov 14, 2005
33% still approve of him ... the terry schiavo types
but 53% favor impeachment


Actually, according to my newspaper this morning, 53% of people agreed with the following statement: "If President Bush did not tell the truth about his reasons for going to war with Iraq, Congress should consider holding him accountable through impeachment."

Which is a blatantly leading poll. Would you answer Yes to "If X were beating his wife, would you support making him stop?" It's yet another example of how the Democrats are stooping to ever-lower levels to make it appear that there's support for their fringe positions.
on Nov 14, 2005

Which is a blatantly leading poll.

Did you expect anything less?

on Nov 14, 2005
Want to check the facts? Not the lies. Let's do that.


Who decides if they are facts or lies?
4 Pages1 2 3  Last