The journey from there to here
Published on April 13, 2008 By Gideon MacLeish In Politics

I've decided I'm grateful for the drawn out Democratic Primaries.

See, they've begun to show the DNC candidates as what they are. As Obama began amassing a lead in delegates and popular votes, the shrew in Hillary came out. At this point, I'm doubting there's anyone to the right of Mao who will vote for her. After all, they'll have Ralph Nader, who has FAR more respect among the left than Hillary EVER will. For that matter, he has more respect among the right and independents, for while we don't agree with all of his platform, Nader falls in the category of "true believer"; he is what he says he is, and that is pretty much the same as he has been for the last 30-40 years.

The problem is, with all of the attention focusing on Hillary, Obama quickly became the party's wunderkind, an all-things-to-all-people candidate whose accomplishments are topped only by the great Brian Boitano (if you can't get a good SP reference, I feel for you. I really do). Obama was going to singlehandedly end the mortgage crisis, put Americans back to work, and bring us to the land of milk and honey. Our modern day Moses was bulletproof, or so it seemed.

Even when his pastor and close friend was shown to be a racist on the level of Louis Farrakhan and David Duke, his shining armor deflected the arrows of the media. No, Obama was not to be undone by mere association.

Obama's Achilles heel, however, appeared to be exposed when he placed his foot firmly in his mouth and made a crack about the people of the heartland turning to religion and guns.

While it may soon be feasibly possible to win a presidential election without winning a single vote in the heartland, such is not currently the case. These same people that Obama wishes to write off as ignorant hicks clinging with one hand to the cross and the other to their Winchester happen to vote. And they vote in a greater percentage than the general population.

We are seeing a side of each of these candidates that we would never have seen had the primary election been quick and clean. Hillary Rodham Clinton will do more to SET BACK the cause of women's rights in America (think she'll appoint a number of women cabinet posts? Think again. She'll not want to be sharing that spotlight) by proving herself to be a manipulative, shrewd woman who is satisfied only by power. And Barak Obama is so out of touch with middle America that he will almost certainly have a sharply divided Congress, even among some of the members of his own party.

This election year more than any, I mourn the death of the great Frank Zappa. Somehow, I'm thinking he could have won this thing!


Comments (Page 4)
5 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5 
on Apr 17, 2008
It is highlighted above


Name the post number PUT UP OR SHUT UP.
on Apr 17, 2008
Name the post number PUT UP OR SHUT UP.


37 is where it is quoted. You find where you posted it (it is easy, just use the search feature).

Now I put up, you shut up.
on Apr 17, 2008
I see he is still ignoring his bumper sticker lies.  Typical far left tactic.

on Apr 17, 2008
37 is where it is quoted


Except I never mention Hillary. You are proven a liar yet again.

PUT UP OR SHUT UP.
on Apr 17, 2008

You are proven a liar yet again.

Have you proved your "Bush arresting people for Kerry bumper stickers" accusation yet? 

on Apr 17, 2008
Have you proved your "Bush arresting people for Kerry bumper stickers" accusation yet?


Nope, and I admit that I have not yet had a chance to do that. I can always take the approach of dr. IwishIwasaguy and name a random post and claim that it proved it but I won't do that.
on Apr 17, 2008
Except I never mention Hillary. You are proven a liar yet again.

PUT UP OR SHUT UP.


That's why you have REPUBLICANS like Jack Kingston being caught lying about Barack Obama. Thats why you have Republicans trying to act offended that Obama isn't wearing a flag pin while THEY ARENT WEARING ONE EITHER.


I asked and you answered to your post. Hillary was caught lying about Obama. I asked, you did not deny.

LIAR. But I guess you are esl.
on Apr 17, 2008
So you claim that me not responding to one of your moronic comments equates to me saying your comment?

You are truly in need of psychiatric help.
on Apr 18, 2008
Nope, and I admit that I have not yet had a chance to do that. I can always take the approach of dr. IwishIwasaguy and name a random post and claim that it proved it but I won't do that.


And you can't prove it because it was a lie, you know, the same thing you accuse "rightwingers" of doing.  What a hypocrite....

on Apr 18, 2008
Still no response or proof?  Just another liberal liar and DNC hack.
on Apr 18, 2008
Still no response or proof? Just another liberal liar and DNC hack.


No, just a shit stirrer that tried to have some fun, but realized that this is not duncesunderground.org or moron.org. Here you get called on the lies, there you just get atta boys.
on Apr 22, 2008
Here you get called on the lies


Yes, I have called you on your lies many times. You simply responded by claiming that you being too clinically stupid to comprehend reality makes up for you being a liar.

on Apr 22, 2008
Still no response or proof?


Actually I have a life and prefer to actually spend time with friends and family over immoral delusional psychotics like you fools.
on Apr 22, 2008
nd you can't prove it because it was a lie,


Oh it couldn't be because I have a LIFE and you are sitting around on your commodore 64 in the spare bedroom of your mother's double wide trailer.
on Apr 22, 2008

Actually I have a life and prefer to actually spend time with friends and family over immoral delusional psychotics like you fools.

Hahahaha.  Typical response....get busted in a lie and now result to insults.  Prove your accusation!

 

5 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5