The journey from there to here

Link

In Connecticut, there's a controversy. Planned Parenthood of Connecticut released a keychain with the well known picture from the Sistine Chapel of God reaching out to Adam. In God's hand in the image is a condom. The Catholic church and other conservative Christian groups are outraged.

Now, I can understand being a little less than pleased. The Sistine Chapel imagery is among the most beautiful and well regarded pieces of Renaissance art, and this particular act is about as close to painting a mustache on the Mona Lisa as you can get. And, it would be fair to point out that, at least in a creationist perspective (a perspective, I might add, not wholly shared in its literal sense by the Catholic church), that had Adam actually used a condom, well...let's just say we all wouldn't be here. But I have a feeling the reason this is even making news is because a) it involves Planned Parenthood, and the Catholic Church's opposition to birth control such as condoms.

Before I proceed, let me point out to the uninitiated that to say I am no fan of PP would be more than an understatement, it would do my position a gross injustice. I am almost wholly opposed to the organization, its aims, its missions, and its philosophical base. But in this case I am inclined to believe that the message, however offensive, has merit.

Why? Because one of the primary reasons for my opposition to Planned Parenthood rests on the fact that they have acted as agents and propagandists for one of the most murderous regimes that has ever existed on this planet. On their watch, more babies have been killed before they had a chance to live than have died in ANY war or under ANY despotic regime. And those are atrocities I cannot ignore.

But many of those deaths could have been prevented had the parents of those babies been educated as to the use of birth control and provided with the means of birth control. While I hold premarital and extramarital sex to be morally wrong as well, I realize that it happens, and that we must live in the real world where it does happen. And I realize the best way to prevent the tragedy of the murders of these innocents is to prevent their conception in the first place. By promoting the use of contraceptives, Planned Parenthood may potentially reduce the number of babies killed prenatally through abortion. And that, I believe, is a GOOD thing.


Comments
on Jan 14, 2006
Stick a cigar in Mona Lisa's mouth and call it a day.
on Jan 14, 2006
I think the use of Catholic imagery in a direct attack against the Catholic church is a total slap in the face to all Catholics. If the depiction was of a well-known Jewish painting, with God handing some pork ribs to Adam, no one would question the outrage. If it was a depiction of Allah handing pork ribs to Muhammed, the same people puzzled over the Catholic outrage would be calling it a war crime.

Or we can just have some fun of our own....


Karen Pearl (interim president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America). ;~D
on Jan 16, 2006
I think the use of Catholic imagery in a direct attack against the Catholic church is a total slap in the face to all Catholics. If the depiction was of a well-known Jewish painting, with God handing some pork ribs to Adam, no one would question the outrage. If it was a depiction of Allah handing pork ribs to Muhammed, the same people puzzled over the Catholic outrage would be calling it a war crime.

Or we can just have some fun of our own....
I see your point. But personally, while I believe it was in poor taste, I'm still inclined to side with PP on this one. If it can help prevent unwanted pregnancies and reduce abortions, I'm personally in support of it.
on Jan 17, 2006
Notice when I defend PP's position, the same libs who attack me when I point out the eugenist philosophies of their founder remain silent? coincidence? I think NOT!
on Jan 17, 2006
I can see why some people find it offensive. Really I can.

But that said, loads of art is offensive. That's the point of artistic license--you don't have to please everyone. Now the real question is, who is PP trying to reach with this campaign? Because if it is the Catholics who uphold the anti-birth control stance--well, I just don't think this is the way to do it. If it was just another way to call attention to themselves, well then, good on them, they succeeded.
on Jan 17, 2006
If it was just another way to call attention to themselves, well then, good on them, they succeeded.


See, and I think this was the primary intent. I can't speak for them, of course, but I have a hard time when individuals who oppose abortion have such a hard time when these groups promote activity that could potentially REDUCE abortions (note: if the male in every incident of promiscuous, consensual sex simply wore a condom, we'd reduce abortions DRASTICALLY in this country).

Thanks for the reply, shades
on Jan 17, 2006

But that said, loads of art is offensive. That's the point of artistic license--you don't have to please everyone. Now the real question is, who is PP trying to reach with this campaign? Because if it is the Catholics who uphold the anti-birth control stance--well, I just don't think this is the way to do it. If it was just another way to call attention to themselves, well then, good on them, they succeeded.

That is why I refuse to bite on their poor taste. Yes, art can be anything, but then I can use my discriminating taste to decide what I will respond to.