The journey from there to here

The government is getting ever so closer to saying what it means. The message that it is sending is that we are too stupid to think for ourselves, better let the government do it for us.

Now, in deference to some individual policies, some government officials are trying to change that, but it's an uphill battle. Witness the attempt to privatize social security (in other words, trust us with our own money) as exhibit A.

What brought this on? Well, a visit from the US Census Bureau (WHAT? Census Bureau? It's only 2006) yesterday...but I'll get to that later. In addition to their letter threatening severe penalties if we didn't comply with their "voluntary" survey, they left a card. The new motto of the Bureau is "Helping you to make informed decisions".

The implication of this is clear: that, without government assistance, you, the individual, do not have the capacity to make informed decisions. And so we must do so for you. It is antithetical to the trust in the individual that is at the core of the Constitution.

I saw the card for the census bureau when I returned home yesterday, and my immediate, gut reaction was not to answer it. But I decided that it wouldn't be in my best interest to have legal action pending from the federal government while waging a campaign I hope to win. So, I answered it.

They made me feel like I'd won the publishers clearinghouse sweepstakes. My data, they reminded me, would represent more than 5,000 American households! Then they proceeded to ask me just about every question possible except my clothing size and the kind of car I drive. ALl of this information is readily available from other government sources, from the appraised value of our home (appraisal district) to my estimated annual income (IRS).

All of this so the government can make decisions for me. I feel warm all over.


Comments
on Jan 06, 2006
The new motto of the Bureau is "Helping you to make informed decisions".

They know you better than you know yourself. Embrace Uncle Sam! He is your friend.

My data, they reminded me, would represent more than 5,000 American households!

This sampling is actually quite a controversial topic. Census takers are supposed to count everyone, not a random sample.

From Census Bureau's website:
Following independence, there was an almost immediate need for a census of the entire nation. The first census was taken in 1790, under the responsibility of Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson. That census, taken by U.S. marshals on horseback, counted 3.9 million inhabitants.

Think of THAT logistical nightmare.

Sampling means that not everyone is getting counted. Does the Census Bureau have the authority to count only a few people and spread assumptions onto the rest of them?

And who says YOU are a good representative of five thousand average American households? God help us all...
on Jan 06, 2006
Well, apparently five thousand American households just got listed as self employed homeschoolers with five children without a fair count...lol
on Jan 06, 2006
This is why I have such a hard time understanding people who argue that the solution to humanity's problems is more government. Never in history has more government every really worked out for anybody.

Not that I'm a libertarian, mind you. I do firmly believe that sometimes a little bit of government is the lesser of two evils. But in general I'm much more interested in experimenting to figure out just how little government we can get by with, rather than imagining ludicrous new fantasies in which giving the government more power over our lives will make things better.
on Jan 06, 2006
I am GLAD I am not running!  I would throw it away!  I am not going to answer another long form!  I have the last 2 times.  Tough patooties!
on Jan 06, 2006
I would throw it away! I am not going to answer another long form!

Isn't that against the law? And besides, you could make it fun: skew the results! Make yourself a seventy-five year-old Aleut Eskimo female with thirty children! Who are they to say you are lying?
on Jan 07, 2006

Isn't that against the law?

Yeah, (sigh!) it IS against the law. It's a law, though, that in most other years I'd be happy to violate. But I think I actually have a chance to win this election and will do all I can.

on Jan 07, 2006

Isn't that against the law? And besides, you could make it fun: skew the results! Make yourself a seventy-five year-old Aleut Eskimo female with thirty children! Who are they to say you are lying?

Yes it is.  But then, how do they know? Fark them!

on Jan 07, 2006
Extremely limited data and knowledge can lead to false conclusions.