The journey from there to here

When I was a middle school aged student, much of my writing had macabre, violent undertones. I wasn't violent by nature, just warped.

You see, I was ahead of most of my class in reading, and I continually searched for new material. I quickly found Stephen King's books, and began devouring them at a rate of about one a week, which at the age of 13 is a pretty substantial quantity.

As young artists are wont to do, much of my creative writing began mimicking the substance and style of my new found hero. I wrote about zombies and vampires (and, I think, vampire zombies), about shipwrecked persons given to self cannibalism and a number of topics too gruesome even for a CSI plot.

And, in the mix were a few requisite apocalytic visions of a world where the schools were the first to go (and, being a "weird al" fan, a spoof of "Thriller" called School's Lunch" that I still consider pretty decent [sample lyric..."and noone's gonna save ya from the ham with the 40 eyes, girl....]). Stuff that, under today's "zero tolerance" rules would have led to my expulsion. My expulsion in the world where I grew up would have meant a virtual certainty that I never would have gotten my high school diploma. That I would have found myself quickly drawn into the world of drug addiction and petty crime that enslaves so many of the poor in our society.

Pretty harsh punishment for someone whose work wasn't even original!

If we're going to have a "zero tolerance" policy, then we must cut off students' unacceptable expression at the head. Ban Stephen King, R.L. Stine, and most other novelists from other school and public libraries. Ban Steinbeck (that ol' Tom Joad's a bad influence), Shakespeare (gang violence in Romeo and Juliet), Harry Potter (remember, all that violent magic DOES go on in a school), and anything else that would encourage a student's creativity, including the Bible (as slingshotting giants is a pretty crappy way to solve political conflict).

We need a return to common sense in this country. "Zero tolerance" laws are actually taking us in the OPPOSITE direction.


Comments
on Dec 05, 2005

We need a return to common sense in this country. "Zero tolerance" laws are actually taking us in the OPPOSITE direction.

Amen!

on Dec 05, 2005
Excellent post and excellent point.

It is disturbing the number of things that are truly great and creative that get trampled under the auspices of keeping our kids safe.
on Dec 05, 2005
That's really thr crux of it. We've gone beyond looking for specific threats in terms of children, and now we are trying to predict the ones that are going to go off the deep end before they really do anything wrong. Have we forgotten that the killer is usually "the quiet guy next door, didn't talk to people much, seemed pretty nice..."

Does anyone else find it odd that this stuff has ramped up at the same time law enforcement is interested in predicting terrorists before they strike? I don't. When it comes to adults we value our own freedom, so we get uppity, but we don't care when it is kids who are treated as if it is a police state.

So what happens when they grow up accustomed to living under that kind of oppression? I'm thinking it wouldn't be hard to convert that kind of system from the schools to the population as a whole once a generation is used to being treated that way.
on Dec 05, 2005
Zero tolerance for zero tolerance!