The journey from there to here

Being a student of history, I have a deep admiration for feminists. They have fought to give rights to women who, for too many years did not have those rights in many societies and they have given voice to a gender that was too long silenced by men who misapplied religious teachings without giving them full understanding.

But I despise female supremacists. Female supremacists have worked to swing the pendulum the other way, to establish DOMINANCE for women, and to drive the male culture to the point of subjugation. They feel it is justified for the years they spent in oppression.

Their argument is as ridiculous as that of racists who would continue to press for reparations and affirmative action programs geared not to put minorities into prominent positions, but to drive whites OUT of those positions.

And female supremacists have blighted the name of feminism.

They eschew anything that to them resembles patriarchy. That's fine and good for them...until they try to enforce their views on a number of women who are quite COMFORTABLE with a patriarchal lifestyle.

They press for equality for women in the workplace. That is a noble and genuine cause, but should NOT be done by DENIGRATING those women who take upon themselves the equal noble and genuine cause of staying at home, raising a family and managing a household.

They argue for "choice" (a euphemism for "it's my fetus and I'll kill if I want to"...but I digress), but spit on the concepts of personal responsibility and common sense that could have prevented the "choice" from being necessary.

They laud fellow female supremacists like Gloria Steinem and Hillary Rodham Clinton because of their politically leftist ideology, but loathe traditional feminists like Theodora "Tonie" Nathan (the first woman to receive a US electoral college vote...a dozen years BEFORE Ferrarro) because of their more conservative outlooks.

Feminists have created a better world, a more hopeful outlook for my four daughters and I owe them much. But Female Supremacists are the sharks in the tank, the ones who would devour my daughters' souls if they choose in a way that doesn't suit the Female Supremacists' mantra. They are a danger, and a discredit to feminism, and true feminists would do well to distance themselves from these monsters.


Comments
on Nov 30, 2005

I got to give you an insightful!  Female Supremacists!  Yes, that is a good way to differentiate those fighting for women's rights, and those that just mouth it while ignoring the abuses.  They hung Packwood out to dry and Gave Clinton a pass, altho one was decidedly worse than the other.

Excellent!  Very well put!

on Nov 30, 2005
Wow Gid..I never thought about it like this, but now that I have, you are right.

I am guilty of lumping "feminists" in with the sharks...as a matter of fact until reading this article I thought feminism was the curse of our culture...not the right to vote or things like that, but the shark activity repulsed me and I believe it to be so full of lies...that it just destroys families.

You are correct. There are distinctions. I will be careful in the future now to make them.

I am also impressed that a man could handle the subject so well. But that just goes to show you I was RAISED in shark infested waters and bought every bit of it until about ten years ago, believing men have nothing to offer on women's issues.

Makes me throw up a little in my mouth to think about it...

What a dufus.
on Nov 30, 2005
Another good example is Maureen Dowd's book "Are Men Necessary". It is kind of tongue-in-cheek, and she digs into women about as much as men, but in the end the spirit of the work is pretty much what you are talking about.
on Nov 30, 2005
Excellent article, Gid.

I consider myself a feminist. In the past I've been somewhat loathe to advertise that because I didn't want to be associated with the likes os Steinem or Rodham-Clinton. When people hear the word 'feminist', those are the women that most people think of, and I'm not like that. I think that there is just as much value in staying home and raising a family as there is in carving oneself a career. I'm also a realist, I understand that there are some jobs and situations where women simply aren't as effective as men.

Thank you for explaining the differences between feminism and female supremacism. Have a cookie!!
on Nov 30, 2005
Great description of the difference between true feminists and what Rush Limbaugh calls the FemiNazis.

To fight for equal rights is a noble cause that should be encouraged and praised. To fight for the right for a few to punish the future in the name of the past, is profane.
on Nov 30, 2005

Another good example is Maureen Dowd's book "Are Men Necessary".

Nah!  That is just sexual frustration!  On her part!

on Dec 01, 2005

I am also impressed that a man could handle the subject so well. But that just goes to show you I was RAISED in shark infested waters and bought every bit of it until about ten years ago, believing men have nothing to offer on women's issues.

I'm always a little reluctant to handle these topics for that reason. But over the years, I have realized that, as a father of four girls (fast becoming young ladies) who wants nothing but the best for those girls, I am as qualified to speak as anyone.

on Dec 01, 2005
I am as qualified to speak as anyone.


More than qualified, and good at it as well. Speak on.