The journey from there to here

I'd like to take you back a few years, to a time when South Park was just becoming popular. I had tuned in to radio "fluff" for a long drive, and was listening to a Christian family radio program (it wasn't "Focus on the Family", but a similar group). On the show, they were talking about "South Park" and explaining it for Christian viewers who hadn't seen the show.

It actually got quite amusing as the guest attempted to explain the "horrible" Mr. Hanky episode in a way that didn't offend his listeners. He was explaining how the show was coarse and vulgar, and how good Christians should boycott the show and its sponsors (without explaining, of course, how we were supposed to find out who the sponsors WERE without watching the show...but I digress).

Never one to bow to an agenda, but always one to be vigilant, I decided to put SP on my watch list. I hadn't heard of the show, but after asking around, found a friend who had many episodes on tape, including the controversial first "Mr. Hanky" episode.

Needless to say, I enjoyed it. I may have condemned myself to a few centuries at the wrong end of a red hot pitchfork for that admission, but I am who I am.

What really struck me, though, is how the conservatives missed the point of the message, which I'll get to shortly.

Flash forward to Christmas season 2005. An increasingly secular society is attempting to strike out all public displays and acknowledgement of Christmas. Michael Newdow is leading the charge to try to have it eliminated as a secular holiday. Why? Because it offends.

Now, back to the South Park episode. See, the whole point of the episode (for those two of you who have never seen it) is how the intolerance that strikes out any public expression of one's beliefs is narrowminded and wrong. Mr. Hanky comes in as the school searches for "nonoffensive" Christmas icons (this, of course, is also the genesis for the "Kyle's Mom's a Bitch" song, Cartman's politically incorrect suggestion for a nonoffensive Christmas song...but again with the digressing). The episode, in short, was a compelling argument from the other side of the fence that SUPPORTS the Christian right in their attempt to express Christmas in a way that they feel appropriate.

Sad to say, such "forest for the trees" mentality is all too common among some in the Christian community. We alienate potential allies in our stubborn insistence on being right.


Comments
on Nov 30, 2005
I heart South Park.

It's fairly common for any given episode to feature a not-so-subtle political/moral message. What's so appealing about the show is that that message is told in the most twisted way possible (there's something to offend everyone!).

Modern day parables, eh? Hehe.
on Nov 30, 2005
I like the fact that Parker and Stone will attack ANYONE for being full of shit... left or right.
on Nov 30, 2005
Well, there is something to be said for not liking the way the message is presented, even if you agree with the message.

I have a love/hate thing going with SP. I think it's some of the most innovative and original writing on TV. They, and the writers for The Simpsons could teach the rest of the baron wasteland (known as TV writers' imagination) more than the other hack's would like to admit.

On the other hand, a turd as a cartoon character doesn't make me want to rush to tune in the show.

I did like the Mormon episodes though. ;~D
on Nov 30, 2005

On the other hand, a turd as a cartoon character doesn't make me want to rush to tune in the show.

, very true. But sometimes "over the top" is the best way to deliver one's message.

And I enjoyed the homeschooling episode as well, even though it espoused a view completely antithetical to mine. Because I understood it was meant to be HUMOROUS, not offensive!

on Nov 30, 2005
Hey, they should have read the disclaimer at the beginning that warns that it isn't suitable viewing for anyone of any age. Don't like it, don't watch it. SP is one of those guilty pleasures I think. It can be soooo nasty but you catch yourself laughing (hysterically sometimes) and keep tuning in. Just don't let your kids watch it! If adults can figure out the message, it is definitely only going to do harm to a kid.
on Dec 01, 2005

Hey, they should have read the disclaimer at the beginning that warns that it isn't suitable viewing for anyone of any age.

I don't think the disclaimer was there in season 1. I could be wrong, but...I think it was a sarcastic response to these imbeciles.

on Dec 01, 2005
Gideon:
The episode, in short, was a compelling argument from the other side of the fence that SUPPORTS the Christian right in their attempt to express Christmas in a way that they feel appropriate.


I don't think the show was singling out Christians, though you did definitely see the trees. Christmas is all about inclusion! Stephen Colbert said it best: "You can say Happy Hanukkah or Merry Christmas. However you feel is your way to celebrate the birth of the baby Jesus."

ParaTed2k:
I think it's some of the most innovative and original writing on TV.


It is hilarious and almost never fails to be the funniest show of the week.

On the other hand, a turd as a cartoon character doesn't make me want to rush to tune in the show.


That, along with the rampant swearing and adult themes make it banned in my house.

I did like the Mormon episodes though.


Yeah they really nailed us on the Joseph Smith episode. Had to be some insider information...
on Dec 01, 2005
There's a huge difference between what you say and how you say it.

I'm sure that there are important lessons you'd like your children to learn. I'm just as sure that there are some teachers and some teaching styles that you would never consider employing.

"Well, sure, it's a cartoon depicting graphic, explicit tentacle rape, but since the Monster of A Thousand Prehensile Penises is teaching that young girl a valuable life lesson about not accepting candy from strangers, I don't see why we should object."
on Dec 01, 2005
The mormon episode was a masterpiece. The statements about Smith and Mormonism weren't really the great part. The greatest part was at the end where the little boy stood up to the other kids and told them that his family spent time together, was happy, and that what they were making fun of was basically the best parts of life that all the other kids lacked... and how they could suck his balls.

Such judgements can be sticky, especially considering the vast majority of "Conservative Christians" who don't miss the point.
on Dec 02, 2005
There's a huge difference between what you say and how you say it.

I'm sure that there are important lessons you'd like your children to learn. I'm just as sure that there are some teachers and some teaching styles that you would never consider employing.

"Well, sure, it's a cartoon depicting graphic, explicit tentacle rape, but since the Monster of A Thousand Prehensile Penises is teaching that young girl a valuable life lesson about not accepting candy from strangers, I don't see why we should object."


ROFL, stute...gotta give you kudos for an insightful, creative response!