The journey from there to here

I'm having a hard time understanding how I was EVER a leftist as I listen to some of the proposals put forth in our current economic crunch.

One of the most glaringly stupid proposals? The suggestion that we TAX oil companies and apply the income to helping low income families heat their homes.

Now, I realize some of you reading this may think it's a good idea, and on the surface it appears to be so. But let's take a look BEYOND the surface and realize why this is perhaps the WORST solution we could propose.

Let's say you operate joe's widget warehouse. You produce widgets at 27 cents apiece and sell them for 50 cents apiece. That 27 percent cost of production includes ALL expenses (labor, equipment costs, utility cost, and, yes, TAXES). Now let's say Joe Senator places a 20 cent tax on widgets.

Well, see, that suddenly upped your cost to 47 cents apiece, meaning your supply price would be 3 cents apiece. Guess what? You can't pay your stockholders at 3 cents apiece and can pretty much be assured of unemployment if you continue to do so. So you up your price by 20 cents, EXACTLY the amount of the tax, meaning your per widget profit stays EXACTLY the same. But your consumers paid more.

If there are several middlemen between you and the end user, each will up their price to accomodate their cost, and the end user will be the one paying the tax. Meaning that the tax on widgets was actually a tax on the end user and the manufacturer didn't pay ONE THIN DIME.

So by advocating for a tax on oil companies, you're advocating for a tax on yourself. Because to a business accountant, tax = cost, and it is ALWAYS factored in to the sell price. And so you hurt the very individuals you intended to help.

This winter, we ALL will be affected by increased heating costs. The increase in oil prices stands to affect virtually ALL retail costs, as costs of transportation and utilities must be factored in at every level from the suppliers and manufacturers on down to the local retailer. Let's not compound the problem by further increasing their costs with a tax on oil.


Comments
on Nov 05, 2005
Taxes as costs are value added along the line of purchase of materials and rightly considered as costs, along with the state and county taxes on utilities. However, tax on profits is a horse of a different color. The current windfall of profit in oil, not widgets, is astronomical. Oil companies should give back some of it.
on Nov 05, 2005
heh, if you think they'd up it an equal amount you're giving them more credit than they deserve. They'd use the tax as an excuse to raise the price and then double it to make even more profit.

"However, tax on profits is a horse of a different color"


No it isn't. They make x amount of profit today. You raise the taxes, making their profit x - t. They simply raise their price and make the equation (x + 2t) - t. Unless you increment t in such a draconian way that all profits are fixed at a given percent, they can always capitalize on your abuse. Sure they pay a bit more in taxes, but they aren't paying it, we are, and they are making more profit as an exuse.

"The current windfall of profit in oil, not widgets, is astronomical. Oil companies should give back some of it."


You think they don't already pay taxes on their profits? What gives you that idea. You don't want "some" you want "more", which would just make them want to take more from us. In the end, you want "more" from us, the people who are suffering to begin with.
on Nov 05, 2005

Gideon, you started out strong, and then tripped at the finish line. Here is why.

YOu sell your widgets for 50 cents, and then the government heaps on a 20 cent tax.  Ok, if it is a fair tax, and every widget maker has to pay it, then the solution is simple!  Every widget maker raises their price by 20 cents and the poor get stiffed again (the rich can afford 70 cent widgets).

Ok, say that there are widgets and wudgets.  Almost interchangeable.  The government zaps Widgets and not wudgets.  What happens then?

Well, since you were competitive before, now wudgets are underselling you, and you are out of business!

Or there are American Widgets and French Widgets.  The Government taxes American widgets.  Gues what?  French widgets are cheaper and sold at WalMart.  American Widget Manufacturers go out of Business.

Finally, lets look at a tax on Profits!  Since this is not a socialist state, you have to pass a law.  SO you pass a law to over tax profits on petroleum widgets.

Sorry, Pa Walton's makiing home made widgets just went under as you just zapped him too.

But wait, you pass an exemption for small businesses.  Pa Walton is back in business.  So is Exxon as they now subdivide their operations and make sure they do not make any profit from widgets.  They break even.  But they do make a lot of money from the oil that goes into those widgets!  Even at Pa Waltons expense!

Bottom line, there is no such thing as a tax on Business.  They will always find a way to pass it on to consumers.  The only way to stick it to business is to nationalize them.  The way Communist, Socialist and National Socialist do. (Nazi for you hard of spelling).

Then what happens?  The government runs them into the ground as the profit motive is destroyed, along with the quality.

on Nov 05, 2005
AGREED

Taxing oil companies like this will not work. Big oil might be an oligopoly , but it is still an open market.
They are going to have to find another way to help people pay for home heating. How about the home owner pay less taxes?
lol
on Nov 06, 2005

Dr. Guy,

Thanks for the assist. I'll readily attest to the fact that I am NO economist, but the fact that I can see at least part of the big picture despite my inadequacies in fully understanding the complexities of economics tells me that it should be pretty obvious to most anyone who cares to take a "closer look".

on Nov 06, 2005

Thanks for the assist. I'll readily attest to the fact that I am NO economist, but the fact that I can see at least part of the big picture despite my inadequacies in fully understanding the complexities of economics tells me that it should be pretty obvious to most anyone who cares to take a "closer look".

You see very well!  Unfortunately, I am an economist (I just love the subject, I did not start out to get a degree in it).

My Mentors are Walter E. Williams and Harold Rapp (my Econ Teacher in College).