The journey from there to here

(Author's Note: Text and title changed from "mandatory reporting" to "anonymous reporting". I goofed on terms today!)

 

A number of my readers have taken issue with my contention that we end the anonymous reporting that is the basis for the majority of reports lodged with Child Protective Services. I would like to take this opportunity to explain why it will not decrease legitimate complaints, and will further help prevent child abuse, which SHOULD be the aim of an agency whose alleged goal is to protect children.

Anonymous reporting does not help to collect legitimate tips. You cannot obtain a warrant for a criminal investigation off of an anonymous report, and cannot use a deposition from an anonymous reporter as evidence in a criminal proceeding. It will be thrown out of court immediately, due to our sixth amendment right to confront witnesses against us.

There are times, however, when a victim needs to be protected. There are already rules in place to protect victims from retaliation from abusers, and these rules simply need to be enforced (in the case of alleged child abuse, for instance, a videotaped deposition is admissable in courts of law). In cases where the accuser has valid reason to fear for their health and safety (which is almost NEVER the case in allegations of neglect, only in those of abuse), then the accuser should, with special permission from the judge, have the right to the same privilege.

Anonymous reporting can potentially OBSTRUCT a legitimate investigation. It is a primary reason where, of the FOUNDED cases of child abuse or neglect, VERY few go to criminal court. The evidence produced has been tainted by the methods of investigation.

What I propose as an alternative to anonymous reporting is a "shield" law. The names are not given in the initial investigation, but can be obtained by the accused or their attorney upon request (but still cannot be given by the social worker "at the door"). Give CPS the authority to protect the accuser's identity upon initial contact, but give the accused legal recourse against false reports through enforcement of false reporting laws already in place in many states. This will give CPS the additional weapon of an eyewitness that they can produce in court in cases of true abuse or neglect, allowing them to put truly abusive/neglectful parents behind bars, where they belong.

Anonymous reporting has been used for far too long as a tool to abuse and harass the innocent. It must be done away with and replaced with a system in keeping with our constitutional rights.


Comments
on Oct 15, 2005

I was thinking "Home Run"!  But not so.  But still great.

No, Anonymous reporting is the boy crying wolf.  Period.  Your suggestions are very good, and I would hope adopted.  But your title yells out for Wolf.  And once you have cried wolf too many times, no one listens. (except CPS, but the innocent are not heard).

But that was my prejudgement.  Your article is still on point and very good, and should be done.

on Oct 15, 2005

Dr. Guy,

Personally, I'd rather do away with it altogether. But unfortunately, I face a mountain of opposition on that front, and am offering reasonable, better compromises (UGH!) that are more palatable, but that might be acceptable to a geater number of people.

on Oct 15, 2005

But unfortunately, I face a mountain of opposition on that front, and am offering reasonable, better compromises (UGH!) that are more palatable

IN that, I (as umpire) now say it is a Home run.  It is excellent.  Now if we can get it implemented.....

Rome was not built in a day.

on Oct 15, 2005

Here's the way I look at it:  if I'm concerned enough about a child's welfare to report them to CPS, I should be willing to make a statement and sign my name to said statement.  CPS has become a tool for unfriendly neighbors to utilize in the battles against each other, and that has to stop. 

 

 

on Oct 15, 2005

dharma,

Precisely. You get an "insightful" for that one.

on Oct 15, 2005
Anonymous reporting should be done away with and so should child-abusers! Yeah, to you with all the solutions. No, really, I think your idea is a good one, but it needs a bit more work. How would it be implemented and at what point in the legal process would the anonymous person become known. I'm not sure that I'd be happy reporting on an issue that I'm afraid of (that say is happening even in my own home) if I wasn't sure that I would be taken care of appropriately. I think the problem is that for the people that are actually suffering from abuse or know someone that is: anonymity is some kind of safety net. People that report crimes anonymously and then turn out to be doing it for revenge should be punished.
on Oct 15, 2005
Yes, I think you have the right to confront your accuser. I personally would think long and hard before ever making a call. I would only call if I really and truly believed that the kids were in danger.

On base, it seems like there is a lot of the petty, everyone in everyone elses business. Out in town not so much. I really try to mind my own business.

As a daycare provider I am required to report "suspected" abuse. I did have one girl who had unusual bruising on her back. I was concerned but spoke to the parents first and it turned out it was from a medical procedure which made perfect sense after they explained it to me. I think you should address your concern to the parents first before you call in the authorities. Sometimes I feel that I am overstepping my bounds talking to someone about their kids but it is done out of love and concern for the kids not out of spitefulness to the parents. Some people just have no sense. I am all for raising your kids the way you see fit unless it is harming the kids.
on Oct 15, 2005
thoughts.(Anonymous User)


anonymity is some kind of safety net. People that report crimes anonymously and then turn out to be doing it for revenge should be punished.


Oh the irony.............