Last Friday, in the wake of the Hurricane Katrina disaster, it was announced that 750 refugees would be sent to Amarillo, Texas.
A local family took it upon themselves to call and discuss what we could do within our own tiny community, not too far away from Amarillo. They were told that housing was needed for the refugees. After asking around, enough housing was immediately volunteered to house 15 refugees.
On Sunday, when the first batch of 150 refugees were flown into Amarillo, we were told they had to be processed and that we could pick up the families in the next day or so. The second, and subsequent flights to Amarillo were cancelled as the refugees were shuttled elsewhere. Meanwhile, Governor Rick Perry told the national media that Texas was unable to house more refugees...while families in the Texas Panhandle were waiting to give them homes.
Amarillo, meanwhile, saw the financial benefits of their influx of 150, and immediately enrolled them in the local schools, while they remained (and remain to this day) calling cots in the Amarillo Civic Center "home" for possibly a year or longer...all while residents sit and wait to welcome them into homes where they will be able to begin the process of rebuilding their lives.
I fear that many of the communities that are housing refugees are seeing the same dollar signs. They realize that bringing in the refugees means more money for their communities, and they can't wait to grab as many as they can. Sadly, this is far worse than the looters EVER did.
The thing is (and I can only speak for myself here), we don't want ANY money for taking in these refugees. We're not planning on charging rent (the families need the money FAR worse than we do), we have a vehicle they can use to get around, and we could put them up in comfortable, if not necessarily spacious, accomodations (though FAR more spacious than a cot at the Houston Astrodome or Amarillo Civic Center). In short, we have a lot to offer refugees who are working to rebuild their lives.
And the government response is "Thanks, but no thanks".