The journey from there to here

This is for all you CPS apologists out there:

Link

For those without the time, or inclination to follow the link, I will rehash the story. A North Carolina family has spent the last year fighting authorities over a picture the wife took of her husband holding up their year old son and kissing him on the belly button. The photo developer took the picture, saw the worst, and notified police, who also saw the worst. The children (the baby and his half sister) were taken away and the family spent months trying to regain custody.

There are those who would be inclined to think this was an isolated incident. I once was one of those. But after extensive study on the subject, I have email bins and file folders full of case history after case history of examples such as this. In all of these cases, families have been irreperably harmed, with an intense distrust of the "system" because of what has been done. And, worst of all, the time and money spent by authorities on spurious claims such as this could have been better spent on identifying and prosecuting REAL abusers.

Make no mistake about it; real abusers are out there. And yes, they deserve to be rooted out and prosecuted. But CPS overreach is not identifying more of these abusers; rather, the increasing oversight of mostly innocent families has left state agencies without the time or resources necessary to find these abusers. One need look no further than the state of Illinois, who saw an INCREASE in child abuse deaths following an increase in state funding for CPS (source: the National Center for Child Protection reform, www.nccpr.org ).

I have mentioned this statistic before, but it bears repeating: Of all of the CPS child removal cases, only 3 percent will ever result in criminal charges being levelled against the parents/guardians. Even when you consider the CPS cases involving emergencies (sudden incarceration/death of the parent/guardian, etc), that still leaves a staggering number of parents wrongfully accused, and their constitutional rights violated, when you consider over 500,000 children in the foster care system nationwide.

In a nation built upon the precepts of liberty, we must seriously begin taking a hard look at those entrusted to protect our liberties. When those charged with the enforcement of law themselves fail to respect the rule of law, only anarchy can result.


Comments
on Aug 12, 2005
I'm speechless...I just can't get over that link!
on Aug 12, 2005
I wouldn't have any pictures these days if it wasn't for having a digital camera!
Totally insane!
on Aug 12, 2005

In a nation built upon the precepts of liberty, we must seriously begin taking a hard look at those entrusted to protect our liberties. When those charged with the enforcement of law themselves fail to respect the rule of law, only anarchy can result.

No Gid, more than that precept is the precept of Innocence until proven guilty.  We have lost that here, and anarchy is the best we can hope for from that outcome.

on Aug 12, 2005

dr guy,

Innocent until proven guilty, while the standard of our courts, is not expressly defined in the same way as are due process, the right to a jury trial, and other concepts of our court system. Sadly, the idea of innocent until proven guilty was lost early on in our nation's history, and has never been reclaimed. The "rule of law" of which I was speaking were those same amendments, which would have forbid the gestapo-like removal of the children from the home without credible evidence, and would have required a jury trial of one's peers to accomplish same.

But we agree on the end result of such behaviour, at least.

on Aug 12, 2005

Innocent until proven guilty, while the standard of our courts, is not expressly defined in the same way as are due process, the right to a jury trial, and other concepts of our court system. Sadly, the idea of innocent until proven guilty was lost early on in our nation's history, and has never been reclaimed. The "rule of law" of which I was speaking were those same amendments, which would have forbid the gestapo-like removal of the children from the home without credible evidence, and would have required a jury trial of one's peers to accomplish same.

Actually, and this is just a nit to pick, they are still violating the right to a speedy trial!  And I wonder why lawyers are not jumping all over that as well!

Juicify a baby and call it abortion and you have thousands of lawyers on your side.  Steal a child (by the state, but is it not the same as the ghouls we hear of in the press?), and not a lawyer to be seen!

Another reason I have no respect for the profession.

on Aug 12, 2005
In a nation where terrorist apologists claim we ask for attacks by economically and philosophically attacking people, I have to wonder why they do this? Eventually, what should you expect when you start off-handedly taking people's kids away?

I believe that many of these systems are brokering babies under the table. I know it sounds paranoid, but look at that case in Maine when the little girl ended up dead. Her adoptive mother ended up being the case worker who had worked in the office. I believe devoutly that some of these "baby" cases are investigated with the new parents in mind.


Regardless, this is a law enforcement matter and should be handled by law enforcement, not some bullshit wing of local government with little oversight and a chip on their shoulder. Anyone who has their kids taken permanently had better be going to jail for a long time, if not, the people who KIDNAP them should.
on Aug 12, 2005

Baker,

Precisely. These agencies act without constitutional authority, and without following the rules of the constitution. They often dupe parents into signing away some of their rights without knowing it, a fact that hinders their later defense. As for the "baby-brokering", while they deny it, I and others have seen far too much evidence in support of its occurence to believe that it isn't happening.

If there was one piece of advice I could give anyone who might eventually have problems with CPS, it would be this: if a case worker shows up at your door, do not say ONE THING to them until you have a lawyer present. It is, after all, your right.

 

on Aug 12, 2005

If there was one piece of advice I could give anyone who might eventually have problems with CPS, it would be this: if a case worker shows up at your door, do not say ONE THING to them until you have a lawyer present. It is, after all, your right.

Excellent advice.  And as for the brokering, that is for another blog.  But thanks for the idea.