The journey from there to here

One of my most poignant memories from high school came in my sophomore. An aviation enthusiast, I walked into my history classroom after lunch, greeting my classmates with a smile and an enthusiastic rehash of my day's escapades. I was urged to silence, however, by the somber faces that greeted me as we sat together and listened for the entire hour to the events that were happening in the wake of the explosion of the space shuttle Challenger. Our discussions later in the week would revolve around whether we should return to space, and the consensus was not whether, but when. You see, we realized, even then, that the deaths of those seven astronauts, while tragic, would be in vain if their life's work were not continued by other astronauts. And, indeed, while it would be some time before the shuttle resumed flight, the very year that began with the space shuttle tragedy would be bookended by the December triumph of pilots Dick Rutan and Jeanna Yeager as they flew the Voyager in the first ever round the world flight without refueling. They knew then, as saner minds among us know now, that risks must be taken in our quest to move forward; the envelope must be continually pushed if we are to advance.

As I write this, the space shuttle Discovery sits on a launch pad in Florida, enduring delay after delay by an organization that fears the possibility of a mishap that could fast turn public opinion against the space program.

It all causes me to wonder: have we become a nation of sissies? Has life become our God to the point where we fear death, which to this point has been pretty definitively inevitable? Will our future risk taking adventures be limited to the strictly supervised, tethered escapades of reality shows such as Fear Factor, or will we get beyond this, realizing that great gains only come with great risks? I hope for the latter, but I fear the former, in a society which increasingly attempts to suppress even its own emotions in the quest for a safety and security it will never attain.

We have gained so much from the space program that we simply take the accomplishments for granted. As I sit here typing this very article, it will be sent to you via a wireless internet connection that was made possible because of "space age" technology; indeed, many of the people who will read this article will do so through internet connections that are relayed by the very satellites that would not be possible without rockets and spaceships to put them there. Our knowledge, our communication, and our very lives have been made better by a space program that we cannot afford to abandon. Sure, there may be fear in the launch of another mission in the wake of the last, failed mission, but perhaps that very fear is needed for us to appreciate that our astronauts are among the soldiers we must recognize for the risks they take to make a better place in which we live, and our children will live. Those deaths should serve to remind us that there are many whose risks are underappreciated in giving us the gifts we have today, and they are not limited to the astronauts. They include firefighters, policemen, and yes, even teachers in certain schools.

To answer my title question, I don't think we have become a nation of sissies. I DO think, however, that we have become a nation of people who care far too much what the media thinks and who spend far too little of our time being guided by our OWN thoughts; our OWN opinions. We cannot allow the opinions of others who overstate risks to sell their articles to control our policies. We must continue, mindful of the sacrifices of those who perished in the line of duty, but not halted by those sacrifices.


Comments
on Jul 14, 2005
*forum bump*
on Jul 14, 2005
I agree. I think we have our respected fiscal conservatives partially to blame. Every time there is a crash, they use it as ammunition against the money we put in to NASA. They see manned space exploration as a needless expense, when we can put satillites and such up there at a fraction of the cost.

What will kick them in the pants is a Chinese space station in orbit, or, God forbid, on the moon. Our military superiority relies on orbit-based resources like communications and guidence systems. Anyone in a position to destroy those at will is in a position to cripple us.

Also, we have a hard enough time knocking down missiles that are fired from the ground. An opposing nation that has space superiority would have the ability to drop stuff on us without the need for the immense cost of propelling missiles up into the atmosphere and back down.

It's a shame that fear and war spur our need to do things we should do as inquisitive humans, but that's how it works. Were it not for the shame of getting trumped with Sputnik, the space race of the 1960's wouldn't have happened. I think we'll see a new race soon, if the Chinese keep to their word about their future efforts.
on Jul 14, 2005
Speaking as a fiscal conservative, I have to say I differ with many of my colleagues in this area. Why? Because I feel that the contributions to our current technology and quality of life from the space program have been almost incalculable; the benefits we enjoy from it are so integral to our life that we don't even notice them. But we would DEFINITELY notice them if they weren't there.

Some of the benefits I can think of, directly and indirecttly, beyond those mentioned in the article are: personal computers (the need for efficient and reliable systems that could be accessed and repaired remotely pushed the reasearch and development that produced the very computer which you enjoy right now), car guidance and control systems, GPS software, solar technology (development of solar cells to fuel satellites assisted in the development of solar cells for consumers), and, I am sure, many other products I couldn't even BEGIN to consider. The space program has paid off richly, and with an enviably low casualty rate, both in property and personnel.

If we could speak with each and every one of the individuals whose lives have been lost in the US space program, I guarantee that their responses would be a unanimous call to press on. And we owe it to their memories to do so.
on Jul 16, 2005
..