The journey from there to here

I have often marvelled at the "news" media's tendency to "break" stories that most people "in the know" have known for years. A wonderful example of this is the trans fat acid "scoop" of a few years back, a "scoop" that any of us who have read Andrew Weil's works were aware of years earlier.

The newest example of this is the "news" that smoking (and secondhand smoking) can affect fertility. The fact that smoking affects fertility has been bantered about for most of my lifetime (though years ago with the "proof" that none of the Marlboro men ever had children); the fact that secondhand smoke is the same thing, unfiltered, should lead us to be completely UNsurprised at this revelation. And yet the media foists it upon us as if it was a new breakthrough (something like "most women love chocolate" or something). It sorta reminds me of the scene from "Dumb and Dumber" when Lloyd leanr that we landed on the moon....


Comments
on May 26, 2005
I worked at a local newspaper in college. When you have an empty spot on the board, there's rarely any idealism involved with filling it. If they couldn't find anything better they'd run the Lindberg baby kidnapping.

"Public Interest" stories like you cite above are the worst. I think they just assume we all forget about them a month later.
on May 26, 2005
News should be weather, traffic, and any extreme major events and that's all. Unfortunately the news programs we have now are variety shows....

~Zoo
on May 26, 2005
Sorry, News comes from North, East, West and South.  And as you noted, not a lot of NEW in news!