My position on poverty in the US is well known to frequent readers, but to those who aren't, I will rehash. I don't believe the solution to poverty lies in governments, but in individuals who can more efficiently assist others with their contributions.
One of the problems with poverty lies in the fact that "fighting poverty" can be a lucrative business venture. Simply get a building donated in kind, and start collecting charitable donations (and hey, if you take a few of those clothes for your OWN family, who would care, right? Take a look around your community. Find the food banks, the clothing banks, the agencies to help with utility assistance; if you work your way around these on a regular basis (as most of the needy do), there's hardly any need for ANY government aid, save for cash assistance.
And yet most of these organizations are run by churches. While they are good organizations to be sure, they refuse to streamline their services by combining with other, similar charities. Why? well, that would dilute their take, now, wouldn't it? Running a food bank gives a minister a little extra incentive to add that extra plea for money; after all, it's not for HIM, it's for the POOR. And setting up a homeless shelter pretty much amounts to job security in the world of the compassionate. I remember in the community we left where a $10 million homeless shelter was being built to serve a community of 60,000.
Don't get me wrong; the services these organizations provide do a world of good. They provide inestimable value to the community and individual when they are run properly. But I have seen far too many "ministers" with dollar signs in their eyes when they realize that they can make a whole lot more by running service organizations than they ever could by just having Sunday and Wednesday services.
And here, I find one of my biggest ethical dilemnas; that is, that the services are being provided even though the ministers are making money hand over fist. I just wish the church would spend a little less time concentrating on its income and more concentrating on its outreach.