The journey from there to here

I understand a monster better than most.

As a child, I was a victim of sexual abuse. I have explained this in previous blogs here.

As I grew into an adult, I was crippled by very real, pervasive fears based on the facts that accompany victims of sexual abuse. Many turn into abusers themselves, still many others commit suicide as they see the monster emerging, and almost all, even WITH therapy, will bear scars for life. I shied away from relationships out of fear that I would become the very monster I despised. Only through a great deal of introspection and therapy was I able to function to anything resembling "normalcy".

Sexual abuse is not pretty. And yet, it is my opinion that it is growing exponentially.

Why? Because many victims of sexual abuse are frightened. They do not report the crimes of the perpetrator until long after the fact, if at all. The same stigma that accompanies rape victims accompanies child sexual abuse, only greatly magnified. This is ESPECIALLY true of the male population (even many therapists tend to assume homosexual tendencies among adult victims...reporting the abuse casts doubt on one's sexuality, among other things). As a result, a given offender victimizes FAR MORE children than are usually reported; the unreported victims go unnoticed and untreated.

And thus, the monster continues into the next generation.

Bakerstreet wrote a recent article proposing removing sexual offenders from society entirely. I am completely in agreement with him, but for different reasons than his. I believe it must be done as much to protect the offender from himself as to protect future victims against the offender.

Victims of child sexual abuse live in a private hell that nobody who hasn't been there can know. The only way we can prevent this abuse from making victims of another generation is to remove known abusers from mainstream society.

It's not only humane, in fact, it is the ONLY humane response.


Comments
on Apr 29, 2005
'The only way we can prevent this abuse from making victims of another generation is to remove known abusers from mainstream society.'

Can you be specific as to what sort of 'removal' you are referring to. I was thinking about lepers today, and how they were colonized. Where would one confine the monster? obviously, it would be to treat the illness of the mind, so there would needs be some kind of Psychiatric facility.

*icon*
on Apr 29, 2005
"it would be to treat the illness of the mind, so there would needs be some kind of Psychiatric facility.
"


If there were treatments for sex offenders I would agree, but at this time there aren't any therapies that work for sex offenders. If in the future something is found, I'll be the first to applaud, though even if it is 99% effective 1 out of every 100 sex offender will still re-offend. That is still too much.

Gid: I agree with reservations. I think one reason we have so much trouble getting the abused to cooperate and respond is the very stigma you describe.

Yes, most abusers were themselves abused. It doesn't work backwards, though. Most people who are abused don't go on to harm anyone, but for some reason we've made suspects out of the victims, just as we do with rape, etc. For some reason sex crimes always have to be made into a two-way street, and I don't think we should perpetuate that.

I'd like to see treatment for victims, for sure, and I'd like for us to realize the intense damage that such abuse causes. I do wish we'd tone down all the "sex abusers go on to abuse" stuff, because it perpetuates the cycle of fear and silence, as you, yourself describe.

As for "protecting them from themselves", you are always the kinder soul than me. I don't want to protect them, I don't even care if they live or die. I know that I am probably morally wrong, but much of nature is. Little things get eaten, the weak are expunged. It isn't a moral world.

So, the reality of the danger of this outweighs my moral obligations to sex offenders. I have a natural, biophysical duty to purge threats from my environment, and the reality is my society is opposed to burning them alive, hacking them to bits, etc.

So, in that light, I agree with you. I think you are a basically good person with good intentions. I am not. If I show any mercy for these animals it is simply social necessity. If I could, as aeryk accused me, "call down fire from heaven", I'd ask which button to push.
on Apr 30, 2005
I think it is important that you pointed out the "mythology" of abused victim turning into abuser. I have heard this anecdotal statistic and have yet to see any comparative statistics to uphold it. Having also suffered from childhood sexual and physical abuse, I found a great period of my parenting to be inhibited for fear of fulfilling a theoretical prophesy. Glad you made it.
on Apr 30, 2005

I think it is important that you pointed out the "mythology" of abused victim turning into abuser.

How about the fact that, with no exceptions that I know of, virtually EVERY sexual abuser has, in the past, been abused.

It's not mythology; it's a fact. I discovered this truism when I discovered that my family's dysfunctionality goes back as many generations as we can trace; I can say the same of every friend of mine who haes ever bothered to do the research.

The cycle of abuse is a surmountable obstacle, to be sure. But it is no myth. If people like you continue to treat it as if it were, the problem will only continue to escalate.