Boise, Idaho has an ordinance against full nudity in public, making an exception for "artistic purposes".

So, a strip club decided to test the law by promoting an "art night", during which its patrons were supplied with sketch pads and pencils. The city objected.

That's a glib explanation, granted (the article appears in Yahoo's "Oddly Enough" News), but it does bear repeating that one person's art is another person's pornography. What I do not understand, and will repeatedly fail to understand, is how a ban on full nude dancing in any way improves a community or the lives of its citizens. No conclusive link has ever been provided, for instance, to show a correlation between exotic dancing and sex crimes (except prostitution, which is questionable at best in its status as a "sex crime"); and in fact, there are some (myself included) who feel that strip clubs may help REDUCE sex crimes by providing an outlet for individuals who, for one reason or another, would be unable or unlikely to get a woman to remove her clothes in front of them for any matter.

At any rate, the issue is up to the city of Boise to decide. But personally, I can't get over the extreme hypocrisy we present by trying to put up a puritanistic front in so many communities when our personal lives are anything BUT puritannical.