The journey from there to here

In the aftermath of the Iraqi elections, the Kurds quite possibly came out the big winners. By obtaining 26% of the seats in Iraq's equivalent of Congress or Parliament, they virtually assured that the two other parties will need to go through them to gain the 2/3 majority necessary to pass Iraqi laws.

There's a lesson in this, and one that I have been harping on for some time. For a third party to gain significant power in the US, they don't need to win a majority, but simply to obtain enough House and Senate seats to cover the Republican/Democrat deficit. This way, the "big two" will need the votes of the third party to pass legislation.

Knowing this, third parties should be studying House districts where they have polled strongly historically, and begin sending campaign money to candidates in those districts. If the typical House member spends $1 million to get elected, this would require an outlay of $40 million, a reasonable fundraising goal for parties such as the Libertarian and Green parties.

The Senate is a little more difficult, partly because of the fewer seats available, partly because of the cost of getting elected. Gaining the Senate seats necessary may not be a reachable goal, but should still be studied carefully. Even an honorable but losing push for the Senate could yield favorable results if the results in the House are obtained. And the results in the midterm elections, which typically draw fewer voters, could well be a springboard to the presidential election of 2008.

To make this a true and lasting victory, however, viable candidates for local, county and state office need to be throwing their hat in the ring in order to produce measurable results that can assist their party's presidential candidate in his run for the White House.

So, to committed third party supporters, I would suggest this:

  • Look in your city, county and state. Find political offices for which you are qualified and which you are interested and run.
  • Represent your party platform and ideals well. Be a harder worker than your colleagues and realize that every move reflects on your party
  • Remove yourself from the mindset of a "wasted vote", and support your candidate 100% from the get go.

By concentrating our efforts and being persistent, we CAN obtain meaningful goals.


Comments
on Feb 16, 2005
I agree completely.  It does work better in a parlimentary type of government, but it has worked here in the past.  and can again in the future.
on Feb 16, 2005
But the Kurds should be considered a 2nd party not 3rd as they did much better the Sunni Party.
on Feb 16, 2005
But the Kurds should be considered a 2nd party not 3rd as they did much better the Sunni Party.


Only because of the boycott. It wont last, but I hope they enjoy their power short term.
on Feb 16, 2005
When will the next election Be? Probley, several years. Anyway the Sunnis will boycott the next one too if the insugents keep their attacks up.
on Feb 16, 2005
When will the next election Be? Probley, several years. Anyway the Sunnis will boycott the next one too if the insugents keep their attacks up.


As did the Tories circa 1789?

Me thinks not.
on Feb 16, 2005
Oh great, another big debate with Dr. Guy!
on Feb 16, 2005
When will the next election Be? Probley, several years.


Several sources I've seen (various articles, including one in USA Today) stated there would be another election next year. I apologize for not providing cites for this, and I'll try to find some now.
on Feb 17, 2005
I would still push for different voting procedures, one much more representational of the voters. There's no reason we have to keep it the way it is. We could vote for Senate seats as a nation and allow people to vote by party, that way if a third party was able to post 1% of the votes in case where there were 100 positions they'd get one seat. But in our current, winner takes all system, we have a very nondemoratic way of electing candidates. I'm not saying that my suggestion is a fool-proof way of "fixing" our voting system. But I'm appalled by how little effort is put towards thinking of new voting practices by the two major parties who are to comfortable with their power to share it with The People.

Suspeckted