I referenced this in another blog, but it was another subject entirely.
When I was 18, I committed a crime, and was taken in by the police. Because they had nothing on me, I was held as a "material witness" as they investigated the crime.
I quickly discovered the consequences of this status. As a "material witness", I did not even have the rights of the other prisoners. I was persona non grata, and, as far as I knew, jailed indefinitely until I confessed to the crime. After two weeks of this confinement, I naturally confessed, and my Miranda rights were never read to me.
Now, there were a million loopholes I could have exercised here, as regards my confession. But I didn't have a good attorney, and reasoned that because I DID do the crime, I should own up to it and do the time. I also was well aware of my Miranda rights, even though they had not been read to me.
But the whole scenario brings up an interesting question: How many individuals have been/are being held as "material witnesses" under the same coersion, and how does this fit in with the constitutional rights of the accused? And while I DID know my rights, I have to wonder how many do NOT.
These are the kinds of questions that keep me from being a true conservative.