The journey from there to here
Published on February 1, 2005 By Gideon MacLeish In Politics

Before I begin this blog, let me say this is a statement of my personal ideology and is in no way meant to diminish the hard work American soldiers are doing in a war zone to defend this country.

That being said, allow me to continue.

When the concept of war was first introduced to me, it didn't make sense. It didn't make sense that the Russians could be the faceless evil we were led to believe they were (I was raised during the climax of the Cold War, remember), and it didn't make sense to point a weapon at someone with the intention of taking that person's life, to prove a point.

It didn't make sense then, and it doesn't now. When your opponent is dead, there is no point to be proven, only a dead body to be consigned to a grave or the ravages of decay.

Similarly, imperialism and materialism made little sense. When one has enough, I reasoned, what is the point of wanting more? Simplicity and pacifism were always matters of common sense to me,never matters of debate.

I cannot say I felt or feel the same about defense. We do have a right and a responsibility to protect ourselves from those less than benificent entities that would do us harm. And to that end, I've never criticized having a standing military (not to mention the practical peacetime applications of a standing military,such as mobilizing equipment and personnel to disasters, such as the tsunami tragedy). But I've always felt the military should be judiciously utilized;after all, the cost of our resources, and even personnel, are significant enough that we should be cautious in their use.

I have very mixed emotions on the Iraqi conflict. It is my hope that somehow this nation and these people, can know the peace that I, as an American, have known in practice if not in theory my entire life, and I KNOW there is no way this peace could be known under Hussein's leadership. I hope the new leadership is different in that aspect,at least.

I cannot help but reflect on the utter stupidity and waste of resources that is war. And I truly hope I will be able to see a day when it no longer exists.


Comments
on Feb 01, 2005
Man has come a long way in the past 6000 years.  ANd he has far to go.  As long as there are power hungry men, war is going to be inevitable.  We can ignore it,but it will not go away.
on Feb 01, 2005
The Stupidity of War

By: Gideon MacLeish
Posted: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 on gideon's trumpet
Message Board: Politics I cannot say I felt or feel the same about defense. We do have a right and a responsibility to protect ourselves from those less than benificent entities that would do us harm. And to that end, I've never criticized having a standing military (not to mention the practical peacetime applications of a standing military,such as mobilizing equipment and personnel to disasters, such as the tsunami tragedy). But I've always felt the military should be judiciously utilized;after all, the cost of our resources, and even personnel, are significant enough that we should be cautious in their use.


Sorry Gideon, but defense is *still* war.
Just to clarify a bit. Country A declares *war* on country B. Coutry B is *defending* itself from A. But they are "at war" with A.
on Feb 01, 2005
i HATE war, it is immoral and stupid...... but {yes the dreaded but word} man is warlike {sad but true} and since the human race is not developed enough to talk things out and settle for some kind of middle ground, we have war... the useless expendature of human youth..
on Feb 01, 2005
Your right war IS stupid!
on Feb 01, 2005
I cannot help but reflect on the utter stupidity and waste of resources that is war. And I truly hope I will be able to see a day when it no longer exists.


Freedom, Liberty, and Democracy.

Ideals, if practiced, can go along way.

Not too many times in history have two countries who shared these ideals have warred each other.

Or maybe people just need more empathy.

Hey, I'm just a simple caveman.
on Feb 02, 2005

Sorry Gideon, but defense is *still* war. Just to clarify a bit. Country A declares *war* on country B. Coutry B is *defending* itself from A. But they are "at war" with A.

I am well aware that defense is still war. But defense has a different purpose; that of protecting one's livelihood. Doesn't make war any less stupid, though

on Feb 02, 2005

Reply #6 By: Gideon MacLeish - 2/2/2005 12:43:53 PM
Sorry Gideon, but defense is *still* war. Just to clarify a bit. Country A declares *war* on country B. Coutry B is *defending* itself from A. But they are "at war" with A.

I am well aware that defense is still war. But defense has a different purpose; that of protecting one's livelihood. Doesn't make war any less stupid, though


Read reply #4