The journey from there to here
Published on January 24, 2005 By Gideon MacLeish In Politics

I think our aid to the countries hit by the tsunami should have some strings attached.

I have said from the get go that I think it should be raised through voluntary sources, and I still do. But One of my pet peeves with foreign aid is the irresponsibility of the recipient.

In disasters such as this, those of higher income are less likely to be devastated, if for no other reason than that they are MORE likely to be ensured. And thus, aid should begin with ensuring that those who have the most need have their creature comforts met and are not likely to perish due to starvation or exposure because of a disaster that left them homeless or without food.

And yet, in India, at least, reports have come back of lower caste members being turned away from shelters by higher caste members who will not share lodging. Defense after defense has been given of India's caste system being "cultural" and how we have no right to change it (funny...we seemed to have a moral right to change the "culture" of slavery in the American South...but I digress). That's fine. But in America, we do, on paper, at least, believe in equality. If you choose not to believe, and to run your country accordingly, fine. But when OUR money is sent, and OUR labor, it can and SHOULD be distributed equitably, according to OUR values.

If you don't agree, you must not need the money TOO badly.


Comments
on Jan 24, 2005
When I saw the title of this article I thought "Now you're talking" and I am in favour of linking aid with basic human rights. The Indian caste system particularly makes me sick, and having recently travelled to Thailand I can tell you they too have a long way to go toward human rights.

The search term 'india refuse aid tsunami' returns 71 hits on google news, you should read some of them. It's been well publicized in many media outlets and here on JoeU that India has refused aid and I can't see how you missed it. What you've argued certainly applies to other countries, though, and I hope you don't take my clarification personally.

David St. Hubbins
on Jan 25, 2005
No, I don't take it personally, david...I've missed a lot, being limited in my time online and not having access to television (and spotty at best radio reception on stations that carry news).