The journey from there to here
Published on September 6, 2004 By Gideon MacLeish In Politics
Before I start this, I want to correct a piece of errata in my earlier post. I mixed up an important fact without the stats in front of me. It was Norman Thomas, not Debs who ran against FDR in 1932, but I still feel his showing influenced the Democratic party's platform.

Anyway, in defense of third party support, I decided to dig back through presidential elections and come up with some 3rd party numbers to show that third parties can and do make a difference. The missing election years are years when the 3rd party was either a nonfactor, or there isn't enough data available to make a fair historical analysis:

*In 2002, George W. Bush defeated AL Gore, with Ralph Nader posting 2.2% of the popular vote.

*In 1996, Bill Clinton defeated Bob Dole, with Ross Perot posting 8.4% of the vote, and 1.8% of the vote going to "other".

*In 1992, Bill Clinton defeated George H.W. Bush, with Ross Perot posting 18.9% of the vote, and 0.6% of the vote going to "other".

*In 1980, Ronald Reagan defeated Jimmy Carter, with John Anderson posting 6.6% of the vote, Ed Clark posting 1.1% of the vote, and 0.6% of the vote going to "other".

*In 1968, Richard Nixon defeated Hubert Humphrey. George Wallace secured 12.9% of the vote, with 1.3% going to "other".

*in 1960, John F. Kennedy defeated Richard Nixon in one of the closest elections ever. This makes Henry Bird's .2% and the .6% that went to other quite potentially the deciding votes that gave Kennedy the election.

*In 1948, Truman defeated Dewey. Strom Thurmond won 2.4% of the vote, Henry Wallace won 2.4% of the vote, while .6% voted for "other".

*In 1932, Franklin D. Roosevelt defeated Herbert Hoover, Norman Thomas won 2.2% of the vote, while "other" secured .7% of the vote.

*In 1924, Calvin Coolidge defeated John W. Davis. Robert LaFollette won 16.6% of the vote; with .5% going to "other".

*In 1920, Warren Harding defeated James Middleton Cox. Eugene Debs won 3.4% of the vote; 1.8% committed to "other".

*In 1912, Woodrow Wilson defeated William Howard Taft. Theodore Roosevelt won 27.6% of the vote, more than Taft. Eugene Debs won 6.0% of the vote, Eugene Chafin won 1.4% of the vote, while "other" won 0.2% of the vote.

*In 1908, William Howard Taft defeated William Jennings Bryan. Eugene Debs won 2.8% of the vote, Eugene Chaflin won 1.7%, "other" won 0.8%

*In 1904, Theodore Roosevelt defeated Alan Parker. Eugene Debs won 3.0% of the vote, Silas Comfort Swallow won 1.9%, and "other" won 1.1%.

*In 1892, Grover Cleveland defeated Benjamin Harrison. James Baird Weaver garnered 8.6% of the vote, John Bidwell gained 2.2%, "other" gained 0.2%.

*in 1888, Benjamin Harrison defeated Grover Cleveland. Clinton Bowen Fisk won 2.2% of the vote, while Alson Jennes Streeter garnered 1.3%.

*In 1884, Grover Cleveland defeated James Gillespie Blane. Benjamin Franklin Butler won 1.7% of the vote, John Pierce St. John won 1.5%

*In 1880, James Garfield defeated Winfield Scott Hancock (by 0.1%). James Baird Weaver won 3.3% of the vote, while "other" walked away with 0.1%.

*In 1860, third party candidate Abraham Lincoln won the presidency with 39.9% of the vote over John C. Breckenridge (18.1%), John Bell (12.6%), and Stephen Douglas (29.4%).

*In 1856, James Buchanan defeated John C. Fremont, wih Millard Fillmore capturing 21.6% of the vote.

*In 1852, Franklin Pierce defeated Winfield Scott, with John Parker Hale (Free Soil Party) capturing 10.1% of the vote.

*In 1848, Zachary Taylor defeated Lewis Cass, with Martin van Buren (Free Soil) capturing 10.1% of the vote, and Gerrit Smith capturing 7.1% of the vote.

*Analysis: If you support a third party unapologetically, do not consider your vote a wasted vote. Although a third party candidate has only obtained the presidency once in history (Lincoln), history shows a number of times when third parties may have helped influence the election and certainly helped reshape the platforms of the major parties.

respectfully submitted,

Gideon MacLeish


Comments
on Sep 06, 2004
Third parties have always played a significant role in elections, by raising forgotten issues and forcing the bipartisan political establishment to take more of the electorate into account.
on Sep 06, 2004
The game should be updated to allow alternative parties. Perhaps some could have single-issue or narrower partisan appeal. Libertarians could have very high ratings for civil liberties, pro-choice voters and taxes, but poor showing amongst unions and senior citizens. Greens could have high environmental ranks but could be perceived as weak on national defense, they may have particular strength amongst women and minorities. It could be easy for each to get kooks or celebrities, but maybe not consultants. The cost of political capital should be higher, but the cost of endorsements should be varied (i.e. generally higher with low cost for the one or two endorsements that reflect these parties' values).

This would really make the game appealing and keep its playability for a long while.
-D
on Sep 06, 2004
Frankly, the LP platform has been grossly misrepresented by the media, when they do choose to represent it. We are not a bunch of drug sniffing perverts who sit around looking at porn all day. In fact, I don't personally endorse the use of any drug, although I have indulged in certain past drugs of choice, and I do not endorse pornigraphy at all. I simply endorse the right of responsible adults to make choices for themselves, provided they do not harm others in the process.

The LP actually has broader appeal than people realize. The problem is, many people have not taken the time to educate themselves on our party and the issues.