The journey from there to here
Published on September 3, 2004 By Gideon MacLeish In Politics
OK, I'm going to clearly outline this as an opinion piece, as there are some that have the trouble making the distinction between opinion and hard news. Feel free to disagree, but let's try to stay on topic, shall we?

We are a country that has lost our vision. With no clearly defined purpose, we have splintered off in separate directions and begun milling around, in desperate hope that a leader with a vision will be clearly defined and "rescue" us from ourselves. To that end, we have clung to pithy Hollywood presentations of pop philosophy, and embraced every half baked psychologist that cable TV can fit in their time slots. As a result, we have allowed ourselves to become divided, petty causeheads, embracing causes for the purpose of embracing causes and not because they hit home. This is not true of all Americans, but it is true of the majority, and the result is that those who DO have a clearly defined sense of purpose often find themselves islands in a raging torrent of confusion.

I submit that it is time for us to recapture our vision. The way we can go about this is by organizing and attending events that work to bring together our communities. By giving, an in doing so, giving hope to those we serve. By finding candidates with true ideals and not dirty politics to represent us in our city councils, our county commissions, our state assemblies, our governor's mansions, and ultimately, in Congress and the White House. By telling the status quo "no more", and by speaking out in every forum where we have a voice. We may not agree on our politics, but we SHOULD share a common vision: that of improving our lives and our communities.

This is not simply a call to volunteer; a mindless drone can stuff envelopes at the United Way office. This is a call to actively involve yourselves, take time to get to know your neighbor, reach out and heal old wounds and show others how to do the same. If we truly wish to see a better world, it starts at home.

respectfully submitted,

Gideon MacLeish

Comments
on Sep 03, 2004
I think that the first thing to get this started will be to get bush out of office.
on Sep 04, 2004
Getting Bush out of office does no good unless we replace him with someone with a vision. Kerry ain't it.
on Sep 04, 2004
Thanks for the great thoughts, Gideon
On this topic I highly recommend reading Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, by Robert D. Putnam. To quote the book jacket: "Putnam shows how we have become increasingly disconnected from one another and how social structures -- whether they be PTA, church, or political parties -- have disintegrated."

What are your thoughts on mandatory community service as a requirement for high school graduation? Or mandatory civil service (not necessarily military)?
on Sep 04, 2004
Getting Bush out of office does no good unless we replace him with someone with a vision. Kerry ain't it.


Hes much better than Bush, and despite your libertarian leanings a vote for a third party is a wasted vote.
on Sep 04, 2004
Hes much better than Bush, and despite your libertarian leanings a vote for a third party is a wasted vote.


Sandy,

This is the most fallacious and misinformed argument. I am incensed that you would play into the political browbeating that tells people who don't believe in Bush or Kerry to stay home (which is EXACTLY the implications of that statement). The fact that you would try to twist my arm by ridiculing my position into voting for Kerry would be more likely, actually, to produce the opposite (FACT: in this election, virtually EVERY Democrat I have met has used the "wasting your vote" argument to get me to vote for Kerry; virtually NO Republicans have used this argument; to me, this underscores the intellectual dishonesty of the Democratic Party).

You and the other Kerry-ites are actually turning me off to Kerry more and more each day. Nice way to campaign for your candidate, guys.
on Sep 04, 2004
And, for the record, I don't have "libertarian leanings"; I AM a Libertarian, and am proud of that fact.
on Sep 04, 2004
I am a Democrat who plans to "waste" my vote on Cobb (Green party). I don't vote against people, I vote for people.
Back to the topic, I am still curious to learn others' ideas about Gideon's "call to actively involve yourselves."
on Sep 04, 2004
Sandy,

This is the most fallacious and misinformed argument. I am incensed that you would play into the political browbeating that tells people who don't believe in Bush or Kerry to stay home (which is EXACTLY the implications of that statement). The fact that you would try to twist my arm by ridiculing my position into voting for Kerry would be more likely, actually, to produce the opposite (FACT: in this election, virtually EVERY Democrat I have met has used the "wasting your vote" argument to get me to vote for Kerry; virtually NO Republicans have used this argument; to me, this underscores the intellectual dishonesty of the Democratic Party).

You and the other Kerry-ites are actually turning me off to Kerry more and more each day. Nice way to campaign for your candidate, guys.


You can vote for whoever you want to vote for. The thing is, that why don't you use your vote to determine which of the two (Bush or Kerry) will win? I think you would agree with me that one of the two would win. So which one of them do your perfer? Isn't that the one you should vote for? Or is making a political statment more important than having the better person in office? Just wondering.
on Sep 04, 2004
The thing is, that why don't you use your vote to determine which of the two (Bush or Kerry) will win?


Because I abhor both candidates equally

So which one of them do your perfer?


This is akin to asking me whether I'd rather eat moose shit or elk shit....I don't want either.

Or is making a political statment more important than having the better person in office?


There is no better person. That IS my point.

on Sep 04, 2004
In the end for me, as long as somebody votes for even the freakin' tooth fairy, that is fine by me as long as they vote and only vote once, tired of some voter fraud, that has not even been brought up by either side, nor have they looked into the issue. Plus they need to make it easier for United States Military Personnel to vote in elections, even if they are abroad and deployed, should they not have at least a right to vote and have their ballot cast, argh.

Anyways, onto the subject of the post, I agree with your message Gideon, but how long or what measures will need to be taken to enact this?
on Sep 04, 2004
shozan,

Although I am not politically aligned with them, a good lesson in political strategy can be learned from the socialist party of the 1920's and 1930's. They began by pursuing local offices, then as they gained political clout and exposure, sought offices in state politics and eventually in the federal government. There is little doubt that Eugene Debs' strong showing in 1932 helped to refine the Democratic party's platform, as socialism was taking hold on the international scene (the entire world was mired in the depression), and if FDR didn't come up with some real solutions and soon, it was conceivable that the US could be next to follow.

The thing is, in 1932 they didn't have the tools we have at our disposal. The internet is a viable medium to getting the message to the masses affordably. One only needs volunteers to put it all together.