The journey from there to here

I am not a Mitt Romney fan. I personally am not supporting him in the primaries, and I wouldn't consider him on my top two or three ideal candidates out of the field.

Yet if he wins the GOP nomination, he stands a better than even chance at winning my "lesser of two evils" prize, and I find it curious that most of the religious right has not endorsed him as their candidate.

As many of you know, I have a love/hate relationship with Mormonism as the faith of my upbringing, a faith I personally rejected long ago. Yet for all of my feelings towards the church, there are certain truths, certain inescapable facts that I can't avoid. While I do not hold to the teachings of the church, I still have a great love for the PEOPLE in the church, as personal experience has taught me you will not find a more dedicated, loving group of people than most Mormons. They have the kind of true compassion that we are called to have, and most Mormons are at least outwardly tolerant of differences in faith and don't engage in the finger waving, tract shoving tactics of oh, so many "evangelical" Christians. Mormons are, to be pithy, a group of people who are generally sincere in their faith. And Romney, in my view, seems to be no exception.

While I'm of the conviction that we could do better than Mitt Romney, I'm also ready to concede that we could do much, much worse. I for one am impressed with Romney's unapologetic defense of his faith without engaging in the political grandstanding of so many who use the pulpit to rally an implied endorsement from God. While Romney stands firm in his faith, he does not use Temple Square as a backdrop, but simply is who he is without apology.

There are certain errors in Romney's past that I consider inexcusably poor judgment. The dog road trip incident would be one of those. But for all of that poor personal judgment, Romney HAS proven himself to be a capable governor, and historically, governors make better presidents than Senators and House members.

Romney's values, ironically, are as consistent with the values of many mainstream Christian as are Huckabee's or any other candidate the right would wish to throw out. He deserves to be considered for his politics, not his faith, and if the truth be told, the James Dobsons and the Pat Robertsons of the world could find few closer friends, even if he doesn't allow their platform to rule his politics. One of the areas where the LDS faith is unimpeachable is the areas of family values--a critical voting issue for many self labelled conservatives.

So, if you are personally a conservative Christian, I would urge you to set aside the ramblings of a bunch of Romney opponents or the fears of end times Christians of a "cult leader" controlling the country (the LDS faith, for all its faults, is no more a cult than the SBC, the Catholic church, or the Methodist church). Find out what Romney's about. If you wish, find out what his faith is about -- not from me, not from your local Baptist preacher, but from your local Mormon missionaries. Invite them over for dinner. They're usually young kids without a whole lot of extra money and I've never seen one of them turn down a home cooked meal...lol! But by all means, vote for Romney for who he is...NOT for who you THINK he is!


Comments
on Dec 02, 2007
I'm always impressed to see your defenses of Romney, Gid. I know you and I don't see eye to eye doctrinally (or politically very often), but at least we can agree on the way that Christ wants us to live, right?

But then, we're both godless heathens who've missed our predestination.
on Dec 03, 2007
predestination.


do what?


the only predestination that any of us have is to be born after that it is up to you.
on Dec 03, 2007
I'm always impressed to see your defenses of Romney, Gid. I know you and I don't see eye to eye doctrinally (or politically very often), but at least we can agree on the way that Christ wants us to live, right?


Very much so.

One of my pet peeves is ex-Mormons who go on a mission to "rescue" Mormons. I've found their propaganda to be nothing more than lies, half truths, and ridiculous exaggerations. I've also lived long enough to learn that doctrinal and political differences shouldn't distract us from who we are and the areas we have in common.

When I was a new Christian, the folks at "Saints Alive" (an anti LDS hate group! practically frothed at the mouth to get me to join their organization. I had no desire then, and I have no desire now, to attack a church that, for all its faults, DID teach me to think critically. One of the interesting ironies of my faith is that it was the testimony of Joseph Smith that led me to where I am. When I heard about praying, using the verse in James, the first thought that came to my mind was, "why can't I do that?" I prayed sincerely, and over the course of the next few years, my footsteps led along a rather dramatic path that led me to Christ. How can I condemn the very faith that led me to my faith?

In the case of Romney, I find it compelling that he's a candidate the Christian Coalition OUGHT to be slobbering over. But because of the works of Walter Martin and company, they've been duped into believing that the LDS church is an insidious organization doing all kinds of weird things behind closed doors.

Heck, if we'd have done all kinds of weird things behind closed doors, maybe I never would have left...lol!
on Dec 03, 2007
One of my pet peeves is ex-Mormons who go on a mission to "rescue" Mormons. I've found their propaganda to be nothing more than lies, half truths, and ridiculous exaggerations. I've also lived long enough to learn that doctrinal and political differences shouldn't distract us from who we are and the areas we have in common.


I've got the same attitude toward any kind of organised religion. I find it quite sane.
on Dec 03, 2007

One of my pet peeves is ex-Mormons who go on a mission to "rescue" Mormons.

I find that to be the case with just about any "Ex".  And their jihad of salvation.  Those who accept their new faith, and can accept those who stay with their old faith are good people.  Those who feel that since they converted they must save all the rest of the sinners are just gad flys that do nothing for their new found faith except to alienate people from it.

on Dec 03, 2007

It's kind of entertaining to watch the Christian Conservative block twisting and churning trying to find a candidate to back.   They say they want the true conservative, but then they ignore the candidates who are the closest to what they define and "true conservatism".

Romney is said to have "flip flopped" on the abortion issue, yet the only changes he has made is gone from, "I'm against abortion myself, but I don't think it's an issue meant for the government to decide" to "I'm against abortion".   Either way, If abortion is their single issue, he is still closer to them than Rudy.  Also, they have to change the meaning of the term "flip flop" to even make it fit him, since it has been years since he has changed his stance on abortion.  (for a good example of the real meaning of "flip flop" follow Hillary from one speech to another).

He also should be more attractive to the Christian Conservative voting block because he stands for the very family values that they claim to espouse... probably even more than my own pick, Fred Thompson.

We'll see who they back, and it will probably continue to be entertaining once they've made up their mind.