The journey from there to here

As 2008 grows nearer and with it the insanity of the Presidential election and all of the accompanying House and Senate races to complete the three ring circus, it's becoming apparent there are issues that they cannot ignore if they have any hope of winning. While the establishment would argue that we have no chance of winning anyway, the growing disenchantment with the political status quo cause me to beg to differ. All we lack is a candidate that can run the distance, something that may be nearer than most people realize (more on that later).

From what I have read in national and state news, as well as what I have heard from the "man on the street", I am inclined to believe there are five issues that the Libertarian candidate cannot ignore, and they would do well to begin preparing to debate now. I'm not presenting my personal stance on these issues in this article (although I will be shortly), just addressing five areas I feel need to be addressed:

1. Health Care  No matter one's political persuasion, most Americans agree we have problems with our current system. It needs to be addressed, and if it is not addressed by the conservatives of this country, a socialist backlash is inevitable, one that will do more harm to our system than good. A strong Libertarian candidate should have a well thought out, well designed plan on health care that helps to address the issues rather than operating on the principle of confiscating personal wealth to provide for the care of the "have nots" or the "have plenty, just not enough" (such as those proposed at the top end of SCHIP coverage).

2. Environment  The Cold War of the 21st century is being fought over the environment. No matter the incredible strides we have made in cleaning up the environment over the last 30 years, the majority of Americans believe that we are all going to die within the next 50 if we don't purchase carbon credits or live luddite lifestyles immediately. The environmental war is a very cleverly engineered propaganda war, built on lies, half truths, and hypothesis, but one that has won widespread populist appeal. Any candidate not addressing the environment in the upcoming race can expect to alienate a good portion of the voting public, and a third party candidate cannot afford to lose any supporters.

3. War in Iraq  Many years ago, I had someone suggest that we have about a four year tolerance for war. Beyond that and we grow antsy, beginning to question the purpose. We are coming out of an administration that has spent all but the first eight months of its tenure actively engaged in war, and many Americans are sick of it. They want answers, they want a plan, and they don't want vague generalities from leaders who feel that the American public has no right to know what their government is doing. A strong candidate would preferably have some military or diplomatic background to give some credence to their proposals, but that can be overcome if their proposals are based on suggestions from respected sources. Nonetheless, the American public will want a solution and will reject soundly a candidate who fails to provide it.

4. Border Security  Like most of our foreign policy, many Americans believe this area is broke. We can't ignore the problem of 20 million illegals, but any program that includes any sort of amnesty is likely to only increase the number of illegal immigrants crossing our border. A good Libertarian candidate should have a proposal that allows for immigration by those who want to build and be a part of this nation, but keeps out those with less than honorable intentions.

5. US Patriot Act  Regardless of what Bush or his spinsters say about it, much of the "US Patriot Act" is unConstitutional, as it revolves around the suspension of certain rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights. The problem is, a right is not something that can be revoked, and the Bill of Rights especially, were not meant to "give you" rights (as, unfortunately, too many children are taught in our government schools!), but to specifically restrict the powers of the government. In the United States, power is meant to emanate from the people upward, NOT from the government downward. A qualified candidate will know and respect the Constitution and the form of government under which we operate, and will work to address the severe trashing this hallowed document has received, most notably over the past 60-80 years.

These are the issues that a Libertarian candidate MUST address in th upcoming election, in my opinion. How they handle these issues may greatly impact the success or failure of the party.


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Oct 27, 2007
You make some valid points here, Gid: sometimes I really wish the Libertarians had a better showing in our twisted two-party system.

(Just as long as the Constitution party doesn't get a foothold, the crazy misogynistic bastards.)
on Oct 27, 2007
all of these third parties are trying to hard for the bulls eye first. they need to build from the bottom up. forget the presidency start with the school board.
on Oct 27, 2007
all of these third parties are trying to hard for the bulls eye first. they need to build from the bottom up. forget the presidency start with the school board.


Daniel,

Please, tell me about the Libertarian Party. How active are you in your state party, how many Libertarian Party campaigns have you been a part of?

It's funny, I could have sworn I was on the ballot for State Representative as a Libertarian in my district in 2006. Oh yeah, I was.

All you SEE is the Presidential race, daniel, because that's all you CHOOSE to see. What you don't comprehend is that the larger races are ESSENTIAL for ballot access. If we don't run candidates for bigger races, we can't even get a PLACE ON THE BALLOT for lower political offices. What you also do not see is the fact that there ARE Libertarians on school boards, city councils, county commissions...we're quite active actually. So, next time you speak out your ass, get elocution lessons!

You make some valid points here, Gid: sometimes I really wish the Libertarians had a better showing in our twisted two-party system.


Thanks, SC. Sorry my reply to you came AFTER Daniel's, but his was infuriating. I love armchair politicians!
on Oct 27, 2007

A sixth issue Must be added Gid. Immigration seems to be a hot button topic to, all the rest of your suggestions are right on the money BTW>

 

MM

on Oct 27, 2007
A sixth issue Must be added Gid. Immigration seems to be a hot button topic to, all the rest of your suggestions are right on the money BTW>


Immigration is in many ways part of border security, but I do see your point.
on Oct 27, 2007
Please, tell me about the Libertarian Party. How active are you in your state party, how many Libertarian Party campaigns have you been a part of?


none also so far i have not seen anyone except reagon that i would joined if i could have. i am in the catagory of voting for the lesser of two evils. i take it back if ms rice had run.


All you SEE is the Presidential race, daniel,


all i see is you crying that there isn't a third party runner for the white house.
on Oct 27, 2007
all i see is you crying that there isn't a third party runner for the white house.


Then you have serious reading comprehension issues, Danielost. I'm sorry you were dropped on your head as a child.

I never said there was not a third party candidate (it's "candidate", not "runner", just for the record!) for President. The fact is, there has never NOT been a third party candidate, danielost. I am a dues paying Libertarian (something you have to be REALLY dense to have missed!) and I am supporting my party. I am offering suggestions for Libertarian candidates for the upcoming race, even as I'm preparing to run again myself.

It's all part of the campaign process, danielost. Positing that there is a problem is not "crying", it is simply presenting solutions.

The Libertarian candidate for president has not been chosen yet, true enough, but then, neither have the Democrat or Republican candidates, in case you're interested. We will choose our candidate towards the end of May.

i am in the catagory of voting for the lesser of two evils.


So you don't vote your principles, you simply sell out to the popular choices without examining your options? Somehow that doesn't surprise me.

I've been beyond civil to you of late, danielost, but if you want to delve back into it, bring it on!
on Oct 27, 2007
-sorry gid i am an independent. i feel the party should stop at the door to the white house, the house of reps and the senate chambers. i also know it wont. there are two things about me i cant be bribed/bought. and i can't be black mailed. or i should say i won't let it happen.


also if i was president little pork would get by me.


an example

the bill to help when the hurricane Edwards(i may have the name wrong) hit Florida was 100,000,000 of that 10,000,000 was earmarked to help the victims. Reagan brought this up before he signed it. i would have vetoed it.
on Oct 27, 2007
So you don't vote your principles, you simply sell out to the popular choices without examining your options?


the only one else i know to vote for is donald duck.


third party names don't get out there so i don't know them.
on Oct 27, 2007
sorry gid i am an independent. i feel the party should stop at the door to the white house, the house of reps and the senate chambers. i also know it wont. there are two things about me i cant be bribed/bought. and i can't be black mailed. or i should say i won't let it happen.


As an "independent" who refuses to have anything to do with parties, you have even less chance of seeing the White House unless you're there on a special tour. Because of ballot access rules, you would need to produce petitions in just about every state. As a Libertarian, that work's already been done for me in many states.
on Oct 27, 2007
Just for the record, you can also be part of a party without being bribed or bought. If you would have bothered to do any research on the Libertarian Party at all before playing Fur Elise on your ass trumpet, you'd realize that the Libertarian Party offers quite a bit of room for individual thought and autonomy.
on Oct 27, 2007
Just for the record, you can also be part of a party without being bribed or bought. If you would have bothered to do any research on the Libertarian Party at all before playing Fur Elise on your ass trumpet, you'd realize that the Libertarian Party offers quite a bit of room for individual thought and autonomy.




i am sure you can in all parties as long as you toe the party line as in the case guillina{however you spell it}
on Oct 27, 2007
i am sure you can in all parties as long as you toe the party line


That's the point. In the LP, there is not a "party line" to toe in the same manner as there is for Dems and Republicans.
on Oct 28, 2007
#1 is a real shame.  It is a solution looking for a problem.  NO system is perfect, but one thing is certain.  There are none out there that are better, just different.
on Oct 28, 2007
#1 is a real shame. It is a solution looking for a problem.


I disagree, Dr. Guy, and in the coming months you're going to find out why.

When a young couple has to bury their one month old child because the hospital turned them away repeatedly and refused to run tests because they were on Medicare and not private insurance, there is a problem.

And one more of America needs to be aware of.

The problem is, politicians on both sides of the aisle have misidentified the problems endemic to our health care system, and their "solutions" will only make it worse.
2 Pages1 2