The journey from there to here

On another forum I frequent, the question was asked about fingerprinting children as a form of ID to speed up the lunch line.

 

I’m going to leave you with your thoughts on that, while I take a few steps back.

 

When I was in high school, we read the standard dystopian novels. Orwell’s “1984” and Huxleys “Brave New World” were required reading, especially among the G/T set, which is where I spent much of my academic career. It was years ago when Ritalin and Prozac became almost mandatory for anyone deviating from the norm, that the soma of Huxley’s world came to mind. Take away their emotions and you stand a good chance of controlling the masses.

 

But now, we live in a world where if you DON’T agree to fingerprinting, warrantless searches (in the form of home visits from social workers and schoolteachers), RFID, and mandatory doctor visits, you are automatically suspect. You are accused of having something to hide by a public that is somehow unable to comprehend the concept of having something to PROTECT.

 

Our government was established under the precept that we NOT live under strict government control. Now we live in a nation where many are quick to insist that we DO. Somehow, if the government controls things, we think that everything will be allright.

 

I have never understood the irrational logic of those who trust a government that is unable to maintain its roads and bridges to manage their personal life. When the government fails to maintain a bridge in Minnesota, the bridge collapses. The casualties are tragic, to be sure, but not as tragic as when the government fails a whole generation of people entrusted to its care.

 

I have long contended that we are about to suffer a consequences of a nation that has “lived under the levee” for too long. The consequences may come later rather than sooner, but is that a legacy we want to give future generations.

 

We’ve lived too long under the government we deserve. It’s time to insist on the government our GRANDCHILDREN deserve.


Comments (Page 3)
6 Pages1 2 3 4 5  Last
on Oct 01, 2007
and of course it isn't a bad thing now but it will be so why take a chance.


After showing you don't know much about what you are talking about, what information do you have to suggest we should heed your 'warning?'
on Oct 01, 2007
"Oh well, I wasn't using my civil liberties anyway."


lmfao.   
on Oct 01, 2007
Why fingerprints? I don't get it. I don't even get why they want to take fingerprints 'in case your child goes missing.'


Because its not about fingerprinting for food. Its about conditioning entire generations into accepting the process of being biometrically audited. The same people who say its harmless are the same people who think they are winning a game of chess right up to the very moment their opponent says "Check Mate".

Couple these kinds of programs with things like the Total Information Awareness Act and Orwell looks more like a prophet than a writer of fiction.
on Oct 01, 2007
little chips that they put in your skin


Oh, to hell with those things...no way am I getting tagged and released.

~Zoo
on Oct 01, 2007

Because its not about fingerprinting for food. Its about conditioning entire generations into accepting the process of being biometrically audited. The same people who say its harmless are the same people who think they are winning a game of chess right up to the very moment their opponent says "Check Mate".


Tiddler, the logic of WHY fingerprints in the name of efficiency raises too much of a flag. Like I mentioned last I knew it wasn't the lunch line attendant that showed to be the bottleneck.

on Oct 01, 2007
Oh, to hell with those things...no way am I getting tagged and released.

~Zoo


Oh Zoo, they'll keep fishing till you take the bait.

Muhahahahaha!
on Oct 01, 2007
After showing you don't know much about what you are talking about, what information do you have to suggest we should heed your 'warning?'


Because its not about fingerprinting for food. Its about conditioning entire generations into accepting the process of being biometrically audited.


on Oct 01, 2007
After showing you don't know much about what you are talking about, what information do you have to suggest we should heed your 'warning?'


Because its not about fingerprinting for food. Its about conditioning entire generations into accepting the process of being biometrically audited.



Now you quote biometrics???

What does biometrics have to do with RFID computer chips being implanted in children and the Mark of the Beast?
on Oct 01, 2007
it is called conditioning as the USA did with social security numbers
on Oct 01, 2007
computer chips




add a gps unit to it and big brother can track you no matter where you are. say goodbye to the only real god given right. free will.
on Oct 01, 2007
Oh, to hell with those things...no way am I getting tagged and released.


YOu already are. You forgot to wear your tinfoil hat, so we transported it into your head. here the beeping?
on Oct 01, 2007
it is called conditioning as the USA did with social security numbers


So now SS numbers are the Mark of the Beast?




add a gps unit to it and big brother can track you no matter where you are. say goodbye to the only real god given right. free will.


Already in cell phones. Are cell phones the mark of the Beast too?

Oh man so many markings of the Beast I'm losing track!
on Oct 01, 2007
So now SS numbers are the Mark of the Beast?


no but when it first started it was voluntary. now it is mandatory
on Oct 01, 2007
Already in cell phones. Are cell phones the mark of the Beast too?


no these also are not mandatory and you don't have to have a cell phone.
on Oct 01, 2007
once the chip is in it stays in.

6 Pages1 2 3 4 5  Last