On another thread, I was accused of being "anti-church". And while I am a devout Christian, I can't say I'm wholly opposed to the label. The legacy of all too many churches is one of hurt, pain and destruction, not of hope and happiness.
As I've taken a look at what has me so disappointed, I am finding it is not my faith that is lacking, but my dogma. See, I no longer care about "majoring in the minors" on faith. I no longer care about this group and that group and whether they have all the jots and tittles in the same place. The fact is, if you don't read Hebrew and Greek, you're probably reading a text that varies substantially from the original.
It's not that I don't care whether people are going to heaven or not. I do. It's just that I don't think that salvation is franchised out like a fast food restaurant, and that you have to believe x and y to get to heaven. I firmly believe that salvation wasn't made for people with PhDs, it was made for simple people of the sort that would have a hard time understanding a concept like predestination, let alone building an entire doctrine around it.
When you look throughout history, it's not religion starting wars, it's dogma. It's not religion blowing up people in shopping malls, it's dogma. Religion builds, dogma divides.
I don't consider myself a universalist. I know very well what I believe. But I don't consider it essential that you concur.