The journey from there to here
Published on September 11, 2007 By Gideon MacLeish In Personal Computing

As a second year IT student at a two year college, I get a lot of questions thrown at me. And since I'm actually GRADUATING at a school where graduation is, sadly, the exception rather than the rule (there are students who've been here over 5 years...as FULL TIME students...who still have not gotten a degree), my opinion among the IT students is given more weight than it should.

The most frequent question I am asked is about my opinion on Windows Vista. One of the students asked me what operating systems I have at home. I told him that I have one Windows 2000/XP dual boot and 3 Ubuntu boxes: one with 6.06, the other two with 7.10. I leave off the varying number of older computers I use to play with Windows 95/98, NT, and Novell. But my preference for Linux becomes apparent pretty quickly.

But when I purchase my new laptop, it will have Vista on it (actually, I'm getting an XP Pro build and will run Vista on a virtual machine). That leads to the inevitable question, "why?"

My answer is simple: Because in this field, it's not about what I want. It's about what the market wants. I could play with Linux all day long, but at the end of the day I'll find my employment options limited. In the end, I need to be competent with whatever operating system the end user has, or I'll quickly find myself unemployed and tinkering with my machines while living out of someone's basement. Don't believe me? Check the number of postings for someone competent in Novell. While they're there, they are filled as quickly as they post, because the market is extremely limited.

So I am, as the title states, a Linux fan in a Windows world. And why wouldn't I be? A mechanic who has a love for Chevy has to work on a lot of Fords. An appliance repairman who is partial to Maytags spends a lot of time on Kenmores. You do what the client demands.


Comments
on Sep 11, 2007
Some very true words spoken.............
on Sep 11, 2007
I'm pretty agnostic when it comes to OSs.  I look at it in layers.

The OS runs apps
The apps assist with tasks.
I have tasks.

As long as I can get my tasks done, I don't care too much how it happens.  If all things else are equal in regards to getting the tasks done I start looking at things like cost, UI, speed, interoperability.

I currently am running Vista Business, XP, Ubuntu, and OSX.  For the most part I can do all my tasks in any of them but stick with Vista because I want to be the ahead of the curve in what the masses are using and Vista is it.
on Sep 11, 2007
As long as I can get my tasks done, I don't care too much how it happens.


Very good point.

I currently am running Vista Business, XP, Ubuntu, and OSX. For the most part I can do all my tasks in any of them but stick with Vista because I want to be the ahead of the curve in what the masses are using and Vista is it.


And that's why I don't go to an all Linux environment. Because as I told someone on a related score, your computer should be a tool to HELP you do your job, not an obstacle to KEEP you from doing your job.
on Sep 11, 2007
Sad commentary on Novell - but all too true.  I cut my teeth on them 25 years ago, and still consider them the best NOS around.  But they could not beat the MS marketing machine.
on Sep 11, 2007
Sad commentary on Novell - but all too true. I cut my teeth on them 25 years ago, and still consider them the best NOS around.
I wonder if I could even find my CNE cert.  It had to be back in '96 or '97.  What a waste of time and money.
on Sep 11, 2007
I wonder if I could even find my CNE cert. It had to be back in '96 or '97. What a waste of time and money.


I kept mine current through 5.11. I still know where it is, but who needs it now?
on Sep 11, 2007

heh, Novell (in comments mentioned above).  Pretty darned good network system that was just too expensive and too unfriendly for average idiots to configure and control.  Great for people that learned to do that work, and great for users (for the most part), but Microsoft beat 'em by putting the basics of the network functionality into their operating system and never looked back.

Personally, I count that whole 'event' as one of the ones that should have been more than enough justification to find that Microsoft had illegally acted as a monopoly, but the consuming public and government were asleep at the switch while it happened and just never seemed to care.

 

I've long been someone that doesn't care much for Microsoft and their tactics, but I use their products and in fact make my bread-and-butter off supporting their products such that it were.  Given a choice, I'd advocate for Linux, and be a Linux admin.  The possibility still exists I could wind up being primarily a Linux admin rather than a Windows admin as I keep my options open.

But, the market fell for Microsoft hook, line, and sinker and as such I keep earning my keep by providing support for their products until the world wakes up and moves on to Linux for the bulk of our computing needs.

on Sep 11, 2007

but Microsoft beat 'em by putting the basics of the network functionality into their operating system and never looked back.

They put File Sharing in it.  It is not the same as a true NOS.  To this day, Novell still beats Microsoft on funtionality all to hell.  But yes, it is more obtuse than Microsoft, and Novell is not Microsoft when it comes to marketing.