The journey from there to here

http://sports.yahoo.com/sc/news;_ylt=Aj87iM0lzwNX2ItWKld3Oko5nYcB?slug=ap-landishearing&prov=ap&type=lgns

The hearing on reigning Tour de France champ Floyd Landis was not supposed to be a big story. It was supposed to be yet another steroid scandal, of course, but one exposing the seamy side of a sport that few people outside of aspiring participants really care a whole lot about. I mean, except for one race out of the year, bicycling is pretty much eclipsed by world class miming competitions as far as public interest goes. CURLING draws more spectators. But I digress.

Now, suddenly, it's become a world of blackmail and underhanded tactics, as former Tour de France champion Greg LeMond (the first American to win the race) took the witness stand and detailed how Landis' manager had threatened to reveal information that LeMond had been sexually abused as a child if LeMond showed up in court. Landis' manager admitted to the fact and was summarily dismissed.

It is highly unlikely that the circumstances of this trial will go unnoticed. Rather than making his client appear guilty, Landis' manager just made it pretty sure that by this time Floyd Landis will be known as the disgraced cheater of his sport, rather than the harangued champion. The Tour de France winner will no longer adorn the mantle of the recently heralded champ.

Do sports stars deserve the "death penalty" for steroid use? Honestly, I'm pretty mixed about this. But I DO think that sports stars whose managers use Mafia techniques probably shouldn't be near the sports.


Comments
on May 17, 2007
Human nature invades all competitions. People cheat. Lots of money at stake. I personally think they're scum, but that's people.
on May 17, 2007
Yeah, I just think the whole strongarming against LeMond is wrong
on May 18, 2007

Yeah, I just think the whole strongarming against LeMond is wrong

According to Landis (and this is in no way a justificiation, just a different chapter in this peyton place), the USADA tried to coerce him into providing false testimony about Lance Armstrong.

I think the whole thing should be tossed and they should have a do over with a new Board.  That is not to say Landis should walk, just that this needs to be done in a more open and objective manner.  The deal should never have been proposed to Landis in the first place, but according to the reports I have read, that is the standard MO of the ruling body.