The journey from there to here

On a recent blog, the following comment was made:

Feeding your own children is good, but not as good as feeding the same number of children who aren't related to you.

While this may, on the surface, sound like a truism, I'd like to address this from the point of view of one whose father lived out that philosophy.

At 16 years old, my childhood journey of being shuttled about between divorced parents and foster homes was through. I would spend the remainder of my childhood years in a foster home, because I refused to return to the home where physical abuse and constant belittling were a virtual certainty.

My father was finishing off as a seminary student, and, within the next year would begin his career as professional clergy. A champion of peace and justice, his eyes were constantly focused on the suffering of children in third world countries rather than his own children's needs at home. As a result, his wife, my stepmother, a woman who was a mere 10 years older than her oldest stepson, was left to handle the burden of three adolescent children whose lives had been ravaged by abuse and instability, as well as attempt to raise three of her own.

While I left my parents' home, I would spend the next 17 years in a futile attempt to salvage a relationship with the man I both adored and loathed. And every time I had a need, the needs of some anonymous child in a banana republic would come before mine. When I made a mistake at 18 that sent me to jail, my father did not once come to visit or to see how I was doing, and I spent the next three years on probation basically a stranger in a strange land, with no family for support. When I was arrested, he was in Nicaragua, demonstrating his compassion for all of his good Christian friends.

When I spent the weekend in the hospital almost a dozen years ago concerned about chest pains and fatigue (an irregular heartbeat was discovered), my dad, a mere 200 miles away at the time, would not make the trip to check on my welfare.

And the seasons passed by. While my father did, on occasion, come up to see us, birthdays passed, both mine and those of my children, without his bothering to be a part. And through all of it, he kept up appearances, and the children of third world countries were always important.

I've healed from those past hurts. Some years back I realized that for my own emotional health, I needed to break off my relationship with my father once and for all. But I still have that hole, that hole that should have and could have been filled by a man whose compassion for anonymous children in faraway countries was as endless as his contempt for the children he sired.

It is good, and proper to look out for the needs of the less fortunate. But we should never think that doing so while neglecting our own children is a noble or proper cause. Or else we are, in essence, creating children that some other person needs to look out for, and continuing the problem. If one really feels the need to focus so strongly on the needs of the children of the third world, it is probably best, then, if they have none of their own.


Comments
on Nov 25, 2006
I think your case highlights an important point. If we lived in a society where caring for your own children was of the highest importance, how many kids would be left without care?

Sure, there will always be children orphaned, but the destruction of the American family has raised that number exponentially. We've reached the point where the traditional family is somehow unfair to people, and we value more highly social altruism for complete strangers. We can praise stars to treat their families like crap but volunteer for the UN to go around the world creating "awareness". The result is peons who don't care for their families AND don't do anything altruistic.

I saw on TV today a study that claims that more people live in households outside of wedlock than those who live within it for the first time in modern history. The excuse was that people are going to be divorced anyway, so what's the difference. If you believe that divorce is a preferable option to being bored, then that's probably true. Otherwise, we're just creating a society where even VOWING to care for your family is an undue requirement.

on Nov 25, 2006
I see that my responsibilities fall in this order:

1) To my offspring
2) To myself
3) Whomever else I can help.

I remember being taught that you cant help anybody unless you can help yourself, and I'm a believer in that one. The only person that comes before me is my child, whom I brought into this world without her permission. She is my first obligation, and everything beyond that is secondary.
on Nov 25, 2006
I was always taught J-O-Y....you have the truest sense of peace and joy when you put Jesus, Others and then yourself in that order. In other words, walk the walk that Jesus walked. He put himself last and others before himself. But you NEVER put strangers in front of your own first. Even Christ said he came for his own first....

I'm sorry to hear of these hurtful memories but I'm afraid you're probably more normal than you think. Most families are dysfunctional. Mine was as well growing up with my parents divorcing after 30 years of marriage. That's why I tried so hard to have our family be outside the norm, and we were. Mom and Dad are still together, kids are well adjusted, self sufficient and successful . We can learn from the bad examples of others. Too often tho, we tend to follow them because it's all we know. It takes alot of work to go in the opposite direction and turn things right side up.

Scripture is very clear. If you don't take care of the needs of your family you are worse than an infidel. Anyone studying for the ministry should know that.
on Nov 25, 2006
The way I see it if you help your family then you're helping the world. It's a trickle down effect that seems to actually work.
on Nov 25, 2006
Well said.

No good, no matter how great can compensate for failure in the home. A parent has a resposibility like no other when it comes to their children.....nothing else can take away a failure there.
on Nov 25, 2006
The way I see it if you help your family then you're helping the world.


That's right. Charity starts at home.
on Nov 25, 2006

Such a sad tale Gideon.  I would think that perhaps your father was working on earning forgiveness for his own actions through later actions, but it's hard to know for sure what his motivation truly was.  Either way, ignoring the needs of his own family is unforgivable in my book.

Nobleness begins at home.  Take care of your own family first and teach them to treat others with respect and they should carry that out into the world.

on Nov 25, 2006

Feeding your own children is good, but not as good as feeding the same number of children who aren't related to you.

Unless I am just reading this completely wrong, I couldn't disagree more.  It would seem to be that this attitude just continues to propogate the nothing of standing around, waiting for someone else to come help.  My responsibility is to my family first, then to others.  And the last thing I should do is expect someone else to take care of mine if I am unwilling to do so myself.

on Nov 27, 2006
This whole idea of who comes first is very very strange. Didnt anyone ever hear the saying "Charity Begins at Home"? Enough said.
on Nov 27, 2006
Good article, Gid. And in closing, let me say this about your feelings towards dear old dad...forgiveness is a gift you give yourself.


I forgave him long ago, LW. In fact, you might say he's been my inspiration...for everything I never want to be.

Don't know if you remember my father's day article from this year, but it summed it up nicely
on Nov 27, 2006
WWW Link

there 'tis. Enjoy.
on Nov 27, 2006
I remember your father's day article very well.  We did not have the same father, but in some respects, they were the same.
on Nov 27, 2006
It used to be that we understood that you can't do one without the other. Being there for your family WAS saving the world. Now we seem to look up to the person who abandoned their family AND the world.

A very wise man once said, "No succuess outside the home can compensate for failure in the home." If we all remembered that, just think how much better position we would be in to "save the world".
on Nov 29, 2006
As I have told an exhausted Tex on several occasions, you have to take care of yourself first and foremost, even before your offspring. Why? Because if you are indeed the main (or sole, in some cases) source of sustenance and support for your children, you MUST see to your own needs first or risk not being around for them at all.


I would agree with you here LW if it were not for the guilt I often feel. Like I said, my daughter did not ask to come into this retched world, but rather my ex-wife and I dragged her into it without her approval. I feel responsible to her even over my own life.

And yes, I see your point. How can I take care of my child if I cannot care for myself first. If I jeopardize my life for my daughter, and lose it, then I fail.