The journey from there to here
Published on August 25, 2006 By Gideon MacLeish In Misc

I mentioned elsewhere that we do not usually have a TV. Someone challenged me when I mentioned a daughter's reference to a recent movie. While I realize no elaboration is probably necessary, I did think it would make a moderately interesting article topic.

First of all, I'm not one of those "TV is bad" folks. While I do not approve of much of the popular culture, it is a perfectly acceptable medium for those who do approve of that culture, and who want to indulge in it. And TV has as much capacity for good as it does for bad, frankly. And, while we can point to shows like "the Flava of Love" and "the Surreal Life" as poignant examples of producers with too much money to spend and too many stupid advisers willing to take it, we can point to a long list of History Channel, Animal Planet, PBS, and yes, even occasionally, network, programs that have made a positive impact for the betterment of society. So my basic philosophy is not that TV is bad, simply that it is superfluous.

Second, there's a difference between having a TV in the broadcast sense versus having a video player. Sure, you technically have the TV, but unless there are actually channels on it, you're pretty much as out of touch with network programming as someone who does not physically have a TV in their home. What you see is often combined with what you view at friends' or neighbours' houses.

The truth is, the primary reason I don't have a TV is not that I HATE TV. It's that I like it a little too much. If I have only videos to play, well then I play the video and it's over. Sure, i may futz with special features every now and again, but you can only watch the Anchorman version of the "Afternoon Delight" video so many times before it, too, gets stale, and you move on to other things. Limiting TV to one's video collection is a good way of limiting the time.

I also find it an unnecessary expense, and one that takes money away from other needed projects. In the last month, we've had over $1000 in off budget expenses, and, frankly, to spend $50 for satellite programming seems to be a waste of money in light of the numerous personal and community projects I need to get done.

So when I mention I don't have a TV, don't take it as a sanctimonious declaration of my pious nature. Take it simply as a statement of fact.


Comments
on Aug 25, 2006
Very well said. I couldn't agree more.
on Aug 25, 2006
Someone challenged me when I mentioned a daughter's reference to a recent movie


It wasn't a challenge, Gid. I was simply curious.
on Aug 25, 2006
We have lots of tv's and they all have cable, and dvd's hooked up to them.

How much do we watch?

Actually, not much at all in the summer. I keep Nick tuned in when doing things around the house in the family room. My youngest plays all round the house and stops to watch it for a bit, then moves on.

In the winter tv is a little more intentional. My husband and I sit down and watch Deadwood, or Sopranos, or Big Love together. But that's only about 3 hours a week..heh.
on Aug 25, 2006
They just cancelled Stargate SG1, so except for the discovery channel, the pickings be bare!
on Aug 25, 2006
They just cancelled Stargate SG1


It was never quite the same without the McGuyver guy (sorry not good with names)with him gone it was barely passable watching.
on Aug 25, 2006
I probably watch too much TV. I do try to be a little bit discerning and not just watch whatever garbage is on. My boys have TV's in their rooms (gift from grandparents) but they do not have cable just a dvd player. I feel like that does limit their in room viewing. I do get tired of hearing cartoons and that was one of the good things about school starting.
on Aug 25, 2006
It was never quite the same without the McGuyver guy (sorry not good with names)


Richard Dean Anderson, and you are right. I loved his irreverance!
on Aug 26, 2006
I recently cut off my satellite programming because the company was trying to screw me. A friend of mine loaned me the first few seasons of Friends on DVD, and that's about all I watch these days. When I was young, a family in Lefors did not have teleivision because of religious reasons. I found this to be extreme, but hey, I guess it worked for them! To each his own . . .
on Aug 26, 2006

It wasn't a challenge, Gid. I was simply curious.

OK, so "challenged" was a bad choice of words. But I did think it would be an interesting topic, as so many people I know who don't have TV's tend to act snobbish about it, when that isn't our reason at all.

on Aug 26, 2006
---So when I mention I don't have a TV, don't take it as a sanctimonious declaration of my pious nature. Take it simply as a statement of fact.---

---But I did think it would be an interesting topic, as so many people I know who don't have TV's tend to act snobbish about it, when that isn't our reason at all.---

I'll be honest when I read the title of your article my first thought was, "Oh boy, here we go again". Not because of you, but because of everyone I know who doesn't watch TV thinks they're so superior. So to get on their nerves I usually exaggerate my TV watching stories. When they bring up a political point I tell them, "That's not what they said on TV." or when I talk to them about the weather I always say, Well the Weather Channel said...."

I do watch alot of TV , and I find nothing wrong with it. I don't think I'm a better person 'cause I do, nor do I think I'm a bad person for doing so. Just like I don't think you're any better or worse for choosing not to watch TV. I'm just glad you're not snobby about it.

I guess most people who give up TV are like any other people who give up a vice. Ever notice when someone gives up smoking they try to get everybody else to quit smoking too, and then they look down on people who choose to continue to light up. Same way when people lose weight.
on Aug 26, 2006
guess most people who give up TV are like any other people who give up a vice. Ever notice when someone gives up smoking they try to get everybody else to quit smoking too, and then they look down on people who choose to continue to light up. Same way when people lose weight.


Not me, no way Jose! I don't look down on people that choose to continue to smoke. I just hope that someday they'll be able to quit if they want to, it's really hard to do. I know cause I put a fist through a wall cause I wanted one so bad...

I dropped cable cause I couldn't afford it! give up tv? well I suppose I could read newspapers intstead. I just got tired of that bill too. I gots me rabbit ears for my tv and while I miss the Discovery channel, Turner Classic Movies, and a few that are similar to Discovery, I can go a little bit longer....

About that losing weight bit...ahhhhh, still have more to lose I enjoy burgers and a carmel malt too much to be a hypocrite
on Aug 26, 2006

do watch alot of TV ,

that is why I loves ya!  I use to.  2 things cured me of it.  Germany, and children!  So I just abide it.  That it is why my favorite shows are cancelled? 

on Aug 27, 2006
I guess most people who give up TV are like any other people who give up a vice. Ever notice when someone gives up smoking they try to get everybody else to quit smoking too, and then they look down on people who choose to continue to light up. Same way when people lose weight.


Exactly. If I had all the time in the world I'd plop down on the couch with a big plastic barrel of cheese puffs (the kind you get at Sam's club), and a 3 liter bottle of Dr. Pepper and wear the remote buttons down to the nubs. I enjoy TV, I just find myself more productive without it. I've seen "TV meters" on some (yeah, yeah, you guessed it) TV show, and, one day, should we have the funds to get the ultrasize plasma TV with the blow your ears sound system, I'm a-gonna hafta get me one of them things. But it will only work for me if I can "bank" my time so that I can flip it on for a cheesy movie marathon once a month or so.