The journey from there to here
Published on August 17, 2006 By Gideon MacLeish In Current Events

When news footage told the story of the shocking death of JonBenet Ramsey, we wanted to believe, in our perverted sickness, that the fine trimmed lawn and expensive furnishings of the Ramsey held a deep, dark secret; that the Ramseys were TOO perfect, and that that "perfection" had to cover an underlying sickness that led them to do the unthinkable.

Given the recent turn of events, it appears that we were duped. More to the point, we ALLOWED ourselves to be duped, because the fiction we created justified the Marxist hatred of the upper classes that seems to drive the thinking of America's underclass far too often. We allowed ourselves to be duped, because ultimately, something within us wants to sabotage the successes of the rich and famous, because in our work-a-day world, we somehow don't perceive themselves to have "earned" their money and their status.

And the media fed on that. They fed us every bit of information that pointed to the Ramseys as the cuplrits, and excluded information that would point in any other directions. They scoffed at the Ramseys, even as Patsy Ramsey was, unknownst to many of us, beginning a fight for her life that she would lose before their names would be cleared in the all important court of public opinion. Because stress is an all important factor in healing, it would not be illogical to conclude that our premature, extrajudicial judgment may have indeed ultimately cost Mrs. Ramsey her life.

The capture of the suspect in JonBenet Ramsey's murder may indeed say more about US than it does about him. We tried, convicted, and treated as pariahs a family that did not earn our scorn, but rather, deserved our sympathies. God bless those people that stood by the Ramseys and refused to believe the worst about them. Shame on the rest of us who fell into a trap set by our own minds.

For my own part, I am deeply sorry about my own premature judgment. I, for one, hope to use this as an object lesson against making such a horrible mistake in the future.


Comments (Page 3)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Aug 18, 2006
"I am not twisting this arguement. In actual fact, you are. just because a young woman wants to look sexy does not make her responsible for the rape. Same thing here."

Again, you're taking a totally different situation. We are RESPONSIBLE for our children, doc. A woman going about her normal day wearing a skirt can't be likened to someone who goes to the extremes Patsy Ramsey went to.

One is like tragically falling off the boat and being eaten by a shark. The other is dragging your kid behind the boat with a chum bucket around her neck.

on Aug 18, 2006

Ah, sorry, I thought you lived in the US. In my country, there's a show Dateline NBC. They've had a recurring show where they go to online chatrooms and pose as kids to see if pedophiles will take the bait.

Ah, sorry.  I thought you lived in normal society, not the netherworld. 

Of course some do!  But this SOCIETY does not!  Damn baker, are you high?  You are defining society by the dregs.  Sure we can!  We can define it by the worst of the worst.  That does not make it so.

.5%, or even 5% of a society does not define the other 99% or 95%.

I guess we should just nuke the million for the sins of the one.  That would take care of it.

on Aug 18, 2006
"Of course some do! But this SOCIETY does not! Damn baker, are you high? You are defining society by the dregs. Sure we can! We can define it by the worst of the worst. That does not make it so."


You have to go out of your way to look for dregs, Doc. Being able to hang out a sign and get them dozens at a time is a little more than "dregs". The people dateline gets are schoolteachers, professionals; people from every walk of life.

Look at the way we treat our kids in entertainment. We don't wait until they are legal to sexually focus, doc, we more often DISCARD child stars when they grow up. Do you think that is a coincidence? Do you think it is just the rare few oddballs that keep kids from being able to stray out into the Internet? How can a few people be seemingly everywhere at once?

They obviously aren't all that rare. Frankly, if you can't see the forest for the trees, I feel sorry for you. Blind yourself to it if you want, but it is getting worse, and worse, and the crimes are happening more and more often. Sitting around and pretending we aren't a culture of pedophiles just invites it to fester.

on Aug 18, 2006

Doc. Being able to hang out a sign and get them dozens at a time is a little more than "dregs".

When there are 300m?  How many are "dozens" as a percentage of 300M? I can find a crook fast.  So that makes us crooks?

Sorry Baker, I will not agree here.  I have stated I do not like what they did to Jon Bennet.  But I will be damned before I blame them for a pervert.  I WAS NEVER ATTRACTED TO HER!  And 299.999 million other americans were not either.

That is just a defense lawyers excuse for not being a good lawyer.  And I will not buy it.

I see the forrest, and it is not made of wolves, but of trees.  But there are wolves in the trees.

on Aug 18, 2006
"When there are 300m? How many are "dozens" as a percentage of 300M? "


Please, doc. If you went into a Syrian chat room and in a short weekend found dozens of would-be suicide bombers, I'd bet you wouldn't be so squeamish about pointing out the realities of their society. We call Iran a terrorist nation, and I'd bet you cash money there are far more pedophiles here percentage-wise than there are terrorists there. If I am going to define other nations by the realities of what goes on there, I have to be honest and do it here.

You see trees because you want to see trees. It would disturb and shame you if you had to openly admit you are part of a society that preys on kids. Whatever makes you sleep well, Doc, but don't by a hypocrite and judge other nations that way and refuse to see how your own society defines itself.
on Aug 20, 2006
I remember when I was attacked in "97" and all efforts were exhausted in trying to find this attacker the detectives wanted me to take a lie detector test. I was very upset and angry that it was turned around to me. I had no record, never ever called the cops before in my life even.

This was right around the time the Ramsey's were being implicated, and I remember thinking the same thing was happening to my family and I as it was happening to the Ramsey family. That's when I first thought maybe they were innocent after all and from there on I would make no judgment call against them. I was living it and it wasn't fun. I was very upset, so I can only imagine what that family went through.

I have my reservations here in this case with this guy admitting his guilt. Time will tell but right now it's looking like he's enjoying his 10 minutes of fame.
on Aug 20, 2006
Baker, I think you're fixated with this society preys on kids thing. I don't buy it. The vast majority of people in this society are not sexually attracted to children. Yes, there are perverts in this society just as there are in any other, but the majority of us find it to be sick.

You say there are 200+ sex offenders in your area. That's out of how many people? And how many of them committed offenses against children? You see my point? You can't define a society by a small percentage. If you did wyou could just as easily say we are a society of murderers, rapists, banks robbers, or paraplegics because our society is made up of small percetages of each of them.

Yes, sexing children up and putting them on display is wrong, but it does not create an excuse for a sick pervert to molest and/or murder a child. That is the real point. I understand your position with regard to the child pageant thing, I really do, but I think you're carrying the idea to an extreme that goes beyond reason or reality.
3 Pages1 2 3