The journey from there to here

It was just another hot Texas day. I was in line at the WalMart Supercenter (you know the one that stretches all the way back to layaway because they don't want to open another checkout? We've all been there). After the interminable Bataan death march to the front of the store, I was now second in line, unwittingly being updated on Britney Spears' prenatal bliss and eroding marriage and the updated exploits of Brad Pitt and Angeline Jolie as they attempt to adopt their 437th child from a small village in Madagascar, and the lady in front of me was quite weary, with three children in tow, one of them apparently traumatized because she had forcibly stripped him away from the Superman costume he so desperately wanted. She had the standard groceries on the counter, with the normal sugar laden foods to placate her screaming children (as well, I am sure, as to give herself a chocolate fix to save the day). What happened next was so predictable, as it replicated scenes I have seen over and over again, in my various excursions to the Mecca of materialism.

The cashier rung up her order, and announced the total. The woman had a brief "ah, crap" moment as she realized that she had miscalculated her purchases and had to cut a few items off the list. As she perused the counter, realizing that she would have to pare her purchases down to the more essential ones, her eyes cruised past the sodas and the candy without even pausing. She stopped as she looked at the baby formula. That would have to go, she decided, and removed it from play. Next up was the laundry soap.

If I hadn't seen it so often, I would assume she was overstocked at home and didn't need those items as bad as the others. But experience has taught me that all too many parents are willing to sacrifice the more essential items for survival in favor of "luxury" items such as cigarettes, candy, and sodas that they simply do not need and have no business buying if they can't afford the more essential items.

Some months ago, I had a friend ask me to pick him up a case of soda in town. This friend is a known mooch, and I knew my money would be gone as soon as it was spent. I'm as much a stickler on buying soda for someone when they're down and out as I am of buying beer or cigarettes: You don't need it, and if you really must have it, you'll wait until you have your own money. This same individual was flabbergasted when I answered his desperate plea to rescue him from starvation with a bag of pinto beans and rice. Hey, it's food for a couple of days, and, best of all, it doesn't cost me much so I can dole out a lot of it. If you want the steak and lobster, though, you'll have to earn it yourself.

The lady, of course, was a composite of so many I have encountered in life. Sure, she may have had more money at home and decided the formula and laundry soap could wait for the return trip. And, in fact, she just may have. But too many people don't, and maybe it's time we start dealing with the fact that a caviar lifestyle should only be bought by those who have the money to afford caviar.


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Jun 29, 2006

Oh my gosh, our church has precisely the program you described. It's been flourishing in wisdom since the 1920's, completely independent of the government.Link

Actually, I wouldn't call it "precisely" the program I described, but I agree that, while I am quite definitely not LDS, there is something to be said for the way their welfare program is structured.

on Jun 29, 2006

I'm wondering what your solution to this problem is, in a 'real' world scenario.

I think ditching government welfare IS a 'real world' solution. I just need to get a majority of Americans to agree with me! As long as we have government welfare, we will have these problems, dharma. Government welfare is the source of this mess in my not so humble opinion.

on Jun 29, 2006

Tova, this is why I would hate to see the welfare system abolished. I just hate to see kids starving because of bad choices the parents made.

This is, ironically, why I WANT to see the welfare system abolished. The entire system is structured in such a way as to invite scam artists and abuse.

By contrast, a private system administered by local charities has the option of setting requirements for participation, and, most importantly, kicking scamsters out.

As for the health/welfare of the children, I must point out that child neglect is a CRIME. CPS acts in a civil court, not a criminal one. If a parent is truly and provably neglecting their children, have them CRIMINALLY charged (meaning, investigation by the DA, not a CPS caseworker), and have the parents tried and, once convicted, locked up. There are MANY private child welfare agencies who could help in the placement of the child once the parents have been criminally charged.

on Jun 29, 2006

Gotta plead guilty here Gid. ;~D

Ok, as much as I love my Mt. Dew, I never remember forsaking baby formula or diapers... I do remember not being able to buy a can, because that 50 Cents had to go towards a loaf of bread... however...

There was a time when we were on food stamps.  At one particular grocery store out west, I was greeted by a friendly cashier... she rang up my groceries with a smile, we exchanged jokes and one liners and had a gay ol' time... until...

Until she read me the total and I pulled out my trusty book of food stamps.  Al Gore could never have predicted a more rapid change in the environment.  This friendly, professional cashier turned into Cruella Devil right before my eyes....

So, being the sarcastic joker that I am... as I walked passed the Idaho Lotto Machine on the wall... I couldn't help but stick a couple of dollars in... Her expression was as priceless as it was predictable ;~D

 

Figured you might enjoy that little tale of welfare woe ;~D

 

on Jun 30, 2006
With all the exciting reading material before you - (Britney Spears' prenatal bliss and eroding marriage and the updated exploits of Brad Pitt and Angeline Jolie as they attempt to adopt their 437th child from a small village in Madagascar) - I don't understand why you even noticed what was going on with the lady before you.

Were I a "Progressive" liberal I would say put an extra heavy duty super tax on beer, chocolate, cigarettes, candy, sugar laden foods (you forgot potatoe chips or is that a vegetabel?) and sodas. - Then take the tax money and give it to the poor so they can buy beer, chocolate, cigarettes, candy, sugar laden foods potatoe chips and sodas. Of course they would need and deserve a tax exempt status...

Daily I thank God I'm not a liberal. This country would go broke if they let me carry their signs.

As far as a real solution in the real world I say we dispense with ALL government welfare programs and simply set up a huge pot of porridge in front of every city hall in America. Any one who is hungry can come up and get a bowl.

There will be only one rule. No coming back for seconds and saying, "More please" - We learned our lesson from Dickens' Oliver Twist about how that turns out.

If a person wants more they must check out a book from the library next door and prove to the "Ladler" that they read it and learned something from it. - The Sayings of Mao will be exempted...

Daily I thank God I'm a conservative!

~~~~

For those of you who do not recognise sarcasm I want you to know that I really belive that somewhere in the middle is the real answer. There are real people in real need. - Handicapped for example. - Conservatives would prefer to help them become useful in ways they can enjoy, handle and profit from while "Progressive" liberals just want to throw tax money at them.

Listen to their protests over this statement but watch their actions!!!

Watch who you vote for in the next election. Democrats lie more often than conservatives. (Don't believe that just watch Hillary's lips)

~~~~~
Sorry Gideon - I got a bit off topic there... -()

on Jul 01, 2006
Sorry Gideon - I got a bit off topic there... -()


sok, I don't mind. I hope you recognized that my tongue was pretty firmly planted in cheek as well. But that doesn't change the fact that there's a problem here.
2 Pages1 2