The journey from there to here
Published on June 22, 2006 By Gideon MacLeish In Politics

Picture this scenario: Little Katie comes home with a piece of paper from school. According to the note, on last month's mandatory mental health evaluations, Katie was found to be bipolar, and she is to see a psychiatrist immediately. The note contains the name and numbers of several school appointed psychiatrists.

You snicker. Katie's been moping around the house, sure, but there's nothing about her that's atypical for that age. You ignore the letter and put it in the round file, thinking nothing more of it.

A month later, someone shows up at your house in professional business clothes. The individual identifies themself as a social worker from CPS, and announces that you are under investigation for medical neglect. You tell them that you didn't see anything particularly wrong with your children, and the social worker excuses herself for a second. She returns, and shortly after, there is a knock on the door. This time, it's the police. They announce that your children are being taken from the home because young Katie is in imminent danger from an untreated psychiatric disorder.

Think this kind of scenario is set in some third world regime or in an apocalyptic novel? Think again. These events could be playing themselves out in American homes within the next three to five years, if the government has its way. And, in the interest of fairness, it must be noted that it is NOT just the Democrats who are pulling these strings, but the Republicans have their hands in it every bit as much. Indeed, part of the proposals for No Child Left Behind are mental health screening for every American schoolchild.

The brochure I received yesterday from the Texas Health Institute addresses the Institute's concerns that mental health issues are not being met. It offers numbers to support its claims that many people in the state of Texas "need" help and are not receiving it in such a way as to make the organization's argument clear: that somehow there is a need not only to get help to these people, but to identify them, with or without their cooperation.

In my past assessments on mental health issues, I will admit to being a little glib. There are certainly people out there who can benefit greatly from mental health treatment. But the truth is, if you leave it up to a psychiatrist/psychologist to determine whether or not you need mental health treatment, they will amost always determine that you do. After all, it is not in their best interests to lose a potential patient.

The truth is, what is on the verge of happening in America's schools is the inevitable end result of allowing the government to grow too big; to take its authority into every facet of our lives. We are so infatuated with the idea of absolute security that we envision a world without crime, poverty, or hunger, and we're willing to take Orwellian leaps to get there, giving the government control of virtually everything. But that is not the path of the free man, it is the path of the slave, and it is antithetical to everything we ought to believe as Americans.

Unless we wake up and begin dismantling the monster we've created, big government will continue to grow until there is nothing left of the freedoms the founding fathers envisioned. And it won't come squarely from the left; the attack will hit just as hard from the right.


Comments
on Jun 22, 2006

nice 1984 at its best huh?

 

"you will do as I say or else!"

on Jun 22, 2006
The scary part is that we've been creating more and more zombies thanks to quick and easy diagnoses that say that what would otherwise have been identified as a normal child is a child that has ADHD or other problems that require treatment with the very best (and most profitable) drugs that the pharmaceutical industries can provide.

It apparently doesn't occur to many of the idiots that are involved in making the decisions and recommendations to drug up our children that:
#1, they ask too much from our children and have set hours for schools that are killing them, or at least killing their creative energy and desire and ability to learn -- as in, we make kids get up in the wee early hours of the day, so they can sit on a bus that will take them to school and have them in their seats having gotten just a few hours of sleep the previous night, partly because the kids had outside activities, and partly because they get loaded up with home work that keeps them up all hours of the nite. Sadly every time theres even a hint of considering pushing back start times for schools in my area, there's so much push back from stupid parents that can't consider for a second what might be best for their children's education and instead consider what is best for their overloaded work and social schedules. Instead of helping their children get an extra hour or so of sleep, it's too important to get little Johnny or Sally on the bus so they can go join the rat race and run through the rush hour to get to work on time for a job that could have very flexible hours if they just asked or wanted to exercise them.
#2, partly because of that work and social schedule issue, the same idiots are killing themselves and their family time by driving through both early and late rush hours -- rush hours they contribute to by trying to out race everyone else to get to their social appointments in the evening. Normally this just results in children being left to be latchkey kids because Daddy or Mommy is stuck in traffic, or had to go out for dinner, or some other item. Maybe, just maybe, if the children or lucky that day, Mommy or Daddy may be busy taking them to some after school event like Soccer or something else that is using up available quality time for both sides.
#3, Children in schools get little time for exercise and physical activities, especially with schedules that change from one day to the next and then back again the next. Instead of making sure children are doing at least an hour of physical activities in a gym class, they may have gym classes one day and a mentally challenging schedule the next. Their bodies don't get into a rhythm at all, and their learning suffers for it. Perhaps those children wind up with too much energy or with lack of attention in class which gets them diagnosed with learning disabilities and psychiatric issues, and we get back to the drugs again.


I'm definitely tired of seeing normal and healthy children getting pumped full of drugs. There's nothing wrong with our children that a balanced scheduled wouldn't help fix in most cases. Perhaps a little extra attention to them to make sure they are being challenged both physically and mentally in their work loads in schools while not overloading them so badly as to frustrate them into lashing out against socieity and others.
on Jun 22, 2006

Unless we wake up and begin dismantling the monster we've created, big government will continue to grow until there is nothing left of the freedoms the founding fathers envisioned

That is it in a nut shell and why I have been voting republican (and been getting shafted).  A small government cannot do that.  A big government cannot help but do it - to justify their existance.

on Jun 22, 2006
Picture this scenario: Little Katie comes home with a piece of paper from school. According to the note, on last month's mandatory mental health evaluations, Katie was found to be bipolar, and she is to see a psychiatrist immediately. The note contains the name and numbers of several school appointed psychiatrists.

You snicker. Katie's been moping around the house, sure, but there's nothing about her that's atypical for that age. You ignore the letter and put it in the round file, thinking nothing more of it.


It's difficult to put myself in this scenario, because I would have never ignored the letter and thought nothing more of it. I would have been going in to the school and discussing the reasons that brought them to this conclusion. If I'd done that, I highly doubt the rest of the scenario would play out as you outlined with the police, etc.
on Jun 22, 2006
It's difficult to put myself in this scenario, because I would have never ignored the letter and thought nothing more of it. I would have been going in to the school and discussing the reasons that brought them to this conclusion. If I'd done that, I highly doubt the rest of the scenario would play out as you outlined with the police, etc.

Well, aren't you clever and insightful. Boy, you sure saw that government intervention coming. Gid's point (if I may here) is to alert the people who are in danger of losing their kids from a seemingly innocent note from the school. And try to mobilize those people to stop the school's dangerous activity now, so it doesn't happen to you. Oh, but wait, it wouldn't happen to YOU...
on Jun 22, 2006
It's difficult to put myself in this scenario, because I would have never ignored the letter and thought nothing more of it.


Maybe when you become a responsible parent and learn what being a parent is you will change your tune.
on Jun 23, 2006
It's difficult to put myself in this scenario, because I would have never ignored the letter and thought nothing more of it. I would have been going in to the school and discussing the reasons that brought them to this conclusion. If I'd done that, I highly doubt the rest of the scenario would play out as you outlined with the police, etc.


Right. You would have doped your child up at the school's request because you have no trouble succumbing to the whims of a Nazi state...and you would have cared nothing for what it did for your kid.

Well, that's fine for you. If you want to live in a world where the state dictates the terms by which you live and raise your family, you can easily move to such a state. BUT DON'T IMPOSE YOUR WILL ON THE REST OF US, K?
on Jul 08, 2006
I will not be surprised if this comes to pass. Why? 3 reasons: 1.A powerful interventionist state is already in palce in the USA 2. Large scale data bases culled from Social Security Agencies, Credit Card Use, Banking Transactions and ther like already exists 3: The war on Terror has already edoded certain civil liberties in the USA.
on Jul 08, 2006
Is is now possible to track a person anywhere in the world using just his/her cell phone. A profile can be built up of an individual using his/her plastic card transactions in order to predict spending behavior. Long back a man called Robert Jnuk wrote a book called Tomorrow is Already Here. a dystopia of sorts. So I will not be surprised at what you write really becomes true.