The journey from there to here

First of all, I want to apologize to all the women I offended with my "panty-waist" comment. They don't deserve a stain like Bud Selig on their gender. But when I weighed it against "Pansy-ass", I decided that it would look better in the sidebar.

Bud Selig suspended pitcher Randy Johnson for five games for throwing at a Cleveland batter in a game recently. Not for hitting him, mind you, but for throwing AT him, in obvious retaliation for Cleveland's pitcher hitting Yankees catcher Jorge Posada.

Non baseball fans may not like or understand this, but there is a certain code for pitchers in baseball. If you are the starting pitcher, you do not let the opposing pitchers get away with hitting any of your team. Especially your catchers. There usually is a retaliatory pitch.

Randy Johnson is more than capable of striking his target, a fact he has shown in the times he HAS hit batters with a pitch. The fact that he threw inside was simply part of the game, part of the way it has always been.

Randy Johnson was ejected from the game, and that is as it should be. But that is where his punishment should end. This stupid "no contact" rule that simpering weaklings like Selig seem to have brought to the game is ridiculous. What's next? Calling a shrink out to have the players sit out between innings and talk about their feelings towards each other?

I cannot imagine Bob Feller being suspended for a retaliatory pitch. Or Sandy Koufax. Or, more recently, Nolan Ryan. Johnson should not have been suspended for simply doing what good baseball players have always done.


Comments
on Jun 16, 2006
you are right, if he hit him then the hammer should fall, but to give him a shave {don drysdale was the best at this} when the whole world of baseball knew it was coming, baH!~!!! america has turned into the land of wenies.
on Jun 16, 2006
Even if he hit the guy he was throwing at, it is part of the game, but as Gid points out the idiots that run baseball can't let the players take matters into the own hands or let them settle the score on the field.

Instead they normally let the original transgression pass, then throw the book at the people that are evening the score and sending back a message that throwing at players is not acceptable.


With all of that said, if the umps would call strikes correctly and give pitchers the whole strike zone, rather than letting the batters "armor up" and hang over the plate, then this might all be a moot point. Too many batters park their butts completely over the plate and if the pitcher dares throw inside it's interpreted as a an attempt to kill a guy's career. Pitchers should be able to work the plate, and if necessary they should be able to throw message pitches (toss a strike "at the fleshy part of the thigh" { a reference to a Soprano's episode and issue earlier in this most recent season } ) without fear of getting warned by the umps or getting ejected because it was in retaliation for an earlier plunking by the opposing pitcher.
on Jun 16, 2006
I should add, on the issue of batters hanging over the plate, perhaps the commish should grow a pair and work with umpires and the competition or rules commitee to use a rule or create a rule that would allow umps to penalize the batters that have been doing it. If you aren't "in the batter's box" and instead are hanging well over the plane of the plate, then you deserve to be penalized for it (be it getting a strike called against you or some other penalty that would send a message to the batters that they can't do it).

Maybe just have the umps keep calling such players out for "catchers interference" or some such until they get the idea that they are not going to be able to hang over the plate.
on Jun 16, 2006
The yankees are not having a banner year.