The journey from there to here
Published on April 21, 2006 By Gideon MacLeish In Current Events

We are a nation that has lost our way.

In our quest for a utopian ideal that we can never realize, we have bulldozed over the Constitution repeatedly. We have sacrificed the first amendment on the grounds that my free speech might hurt your feelings; we have sacrificed the second on the spurious notion that somehow by removing legally owned weapons we are making our society safer. The fourth, fifth, and sixth amendments have suffered similar defeats, as we've begun to consider warrants all but superfluous in our apprehension of suspected criminals, and allowed anonymous reports to carry weight, something that has NEVER been an acceptable practice in the justice systems of ANY civilized society, with the exception of certain totalitarian regimes (raising the question of how far we are from becoming one ourselves.

Nowhere have these intrusions been more evident than in our "family courts" and with government agencies carrying such noble and seemingly well intentioned names as "Child Protective Services", "Family Support Services", and the like. These agencies terrorize families and remove children based on spurious, often anonymous, complaints, trumped up charges, or other equally dubious reasons. Babies have been stripped from mothers' arms in maternity wards because of past involvement with these agencies, and older children often find themselves shuttled from home to home until society says they are old enough to fend for themselves, despite the fact they haven't been equipped with the tools to do so. All too often the less than perfect homes where some of these children lived are far better than the hellholes that they find themselves in as so many foster parents take in as many children as the government will allow to make extra income.

I have given the numbers before, but will repeat them here: over 580,000 children in US foster care; only 44% of those children will ever be returned home, despite the fact that only 3% of their parents will ever be charged with abuse or neglect, let alone convicted. By these agencies' own estimates, over 60% of the cases referred to them are retired completely unfounded, and a strong number of the cases are "founded" on such shaky grounds as dirty dishes in the sink, unmade beds, etc. The majority of these households are lower income families unable to afford legal representation. We have, in effect, criminalized poverty.

Many of these children will grow up with an extremely poor sense of self worth. They will hear lies told by their foster parents about their biological parents; most notably that their biological parents don't care enough to visit with them or send them birthday presents, when the simple truth is, in many cases, the biological parents are EXTREMELY limited in their access to the children, and letters and gifts are all too often intercepted so that a case worker can screen them for hidden messages. When the gifts are forwarded to the children, the children are often not told that their parents sent them.

These children will hit the magical age of adulthood without a support system. Their foster families are no longer receiving a paycheck, and therefore, do not provide a community support for these young adults, and years of estrangement from their biological parents makes it unlikely these young adults will receive the family support that is so essential to development in those years. The determined will make it; they always do, but too many will be lost to drug addiction and other chemical dependency, and, too often, to a life of crime.

This problem is especially appalling because the "big two" parties won't address it. To the Democrats, it is everything they ever wanted: the children are being raised by a nanny state, and will become dependent on that state for entitlements rather than achieving self sufficiency. After all, as one high ranking Democrat once famously demanded, "it takes a village". To the Republicans, it is a poitical nonissue. The affected families are predominantly poor and unlikely to vote for their candidates, and the Democrats have so successfully spun the issue that the few principled Republicans that remain are afraid of speking honestly out of fear of being castigated for defending child abusers. After all, their own pundits successfully destroyed Michael Dukakis on the strength of Willie Horton, who knows what cases Democratic pundits could use to destroy a Republican who stood up to the system?

It is time we begin to think of the children. They should be our foremost concern. Unless a parent is provably incapable or unwilling of raising a child in a reasonably safe environment, they should ALWAYS be, not only the first, but the ONLY choice for placement. We have made a horrible mistake in empowering Child Protective Services as we have, and now we need to remedy that mistake.

Too many children will cry themselves to sleep tonight, tomorrow night, and onward until the situation is resolved. It is our DUTY to ensure that their tears are not shed in vain.

 


Comments
on Apr 21, 2006
As a generalization, I cannot help but agree with you.  But as recent history with me, and now a friend attests, not all judges are idiots, and not all CPS are evil.  I have no doubt that abuses exist here in the old dominion.  Thankfully, I am privy to many cases, some publicized, that seem to indicate at least here, the system is working.  not perfectly, but at least not abusively either.
on Apr 21, 2006
I understand where you're coming from. I really for truly do.

I've dealt with CPS in the past. I have no children of my own, so my experience has not been in that capacity. I am a mandated reporter, however, and have dealt with CPS in that manner. Very few times as a matter of fact.

In my limited experience with CPS, the social workers have been diligent and have cared about the children and families in question very much, and have wanted what was best for those children, whether that be removing the child from the home, checking out the home and deeming it fit or not, or just filing away a report.

I think you feel very victimized by CPS, and I can understand that. You've been through alot with them, and unrightly so.

But what about the GOOD that CPS does? What about the children that cry because mom and dad are beating the crap out of each other again? What about the kids who cry because their uncles touch them in inappropriate ways? What about the kids who cry because dad verbally abuses them? What about THOSE kids? What about THOSE kids who are HELPED by CPS?

Judas Priest Barbers. If CPS helps just ONE child ever, I think its worth it. Because there are so many people who can anonymously report suspicious neglect and such, the system will NEVER be perfect. It's about humanity, Gid. It's about creating a kinder humanity for the kids who have it tough at home. Lots of people don't care when the children cry. Sometimes they even work at CPS. But lots of people do care, and lots of those people work for CPS, too. It's about giving a voice to those who are helpless to speak for themselves.
on Apr 21, 2006

If CPS helps just ONE child ever, I think its worth it.

So the trampling of your rights to save one child is worth it?  You write a very good comment, but I cannot beleive that you truly believe that the ends justify the means.  Have not we seen that lead to erradication of all rights too many times in the past?

The simple truth is that CPS causes as many tragedies as it saves.  And the worst part about it is that so many are destroyed by the "road to hell is paved with the best intentions" mentality.  They do miss many, they get some, and they destroy a lot.  The price is not worth it.

on Apr 22, 2006

But what about the GOOD that CPS does? What about the children that cry because mom and dad are beating the crap out of each other again? What about the kids who cry because their uncles touch them in inappropriate ways? What about the kids who cry because dad verbally abuses them? What about THOSE kids? What about THOSE kids who are HELPED by CPS?

Abuse is against the law, as it should be. When a parent abuses a child, USE the law to see to it that parent gets help, punishment, or a combination of both. CPS does not use the law, it circumvents it. Most provable cases of abuse are tainted by CPS investigations, as they do not obtain evidence properly. As a result, too often families that DO abuse their children are almost never prosecuted, unless it is an extremely sensational case.

The only "legitimate" role an agency like CPS should have is to place children who are removed because the household is a place where the child is in danger. Period. CPS should not investigate these cases, and should not have the power to "try" them in what amounts to a kangaroo court. The work of placement, however, would be better facilitated by private, nonprofit agencies such as the Bair foundation, who can do it at less expense and with better oversight.

I do not agree that it is "worth it" if you can save one child. How many foster children have committed suicide because they felt they were unwanted after suffering in an uncaring system. Was it truly "worth it" to see their lives snuffed out because you removed another child from a home where they needed to be removed? Is it "worth it" when parents suffer the stigma, the loss of jobs, and the pain of separation from their children because a neighbor decided to avail themselves of the anonymous tip line based simply on the fact they didn't LIKE the parents? We have to stop ignoring flagrant violations of our rights simply on the spurious notion that it might be "worth it" to catch a few criminals.

on Apr 22, 2006

The simple truth is that CPS causes as many tragedies as it saves.

Actually, statistically, Dr, CPS causes MORE tragedies than lives they save. It would be like saying that the police should arrest and incarcerate everyone in the inner city, because it's worth it to get the criminals you DO catch through such action.

on Apr 26, 2006
Again, I completely see where you're coming from, and I respect what you have to say.

Like I said, I'm not a parent and other than the few conversations I've had with a case worker, I haven't had any involvement with the CPS, so I can only imagine what it must be like to be unjustly accused of mistreatment of your children when in fact no such thing has happened, or to have your children taken away when you're trying your hardest.

Maybe what CPS should do is really push for some widespread parenting education? I like your idea about nonprofits overseeing child welfare, too. Very interesting thought.
on Apr 26, 2006

Actually, statistically, Dr, CPS causes MORE tragedies than lives they save. It would be like saying that the police should arrest and incarcerate everyone in the inner city, because it's worth it to get the criminals you DO catch through such action.

Point taken.  I was using a generality.

on May 02, 2006
You are right, we need to make the State make changes in the laws and policies. It is really hard to get action, and it will take many people to make a change. I have contacted the governor, senator, my representative, and the Board of Education on Homeschooling, and it does no good.

Michigan has no monitoring of home schoolers, they are too isolated. there should be regulations and monitoring of the child, for many reasons, and most important to ensure they are not being abused. Ricky Holland was ripped of this opportunity also.

Another interesting thing, is that the State paid Lisa and Tim Holland 26,000 dollars a year to take care of Ricky and 2 other siblings, but they wouldn't help his biological mother. If she could have received that amount of money she could have made a life for him. The system makes no sense. They pay uncaring people, but not the people that love them but are unable to care for them.
on May 03, 2006
Michigan has no monitoring of home schoolers, they are too isolated. there should be regulations and monitoring of the child, for many reasons, and most important to ensure they are not being abused. Ricky Holland was ripped of this opportunity also.


Homeschooling didn't make the Hollands abusers. It is not to blame here. I disagree that homeschooling needs greater regulation; barring a social worker living in their home, there is no way that they can guarantee a parent is not abusive. An authoritarian state is something we're trying to AVOID, not trying to achieve.

We CAN serve the children better by recognizing the Constitutional rights of the parents. This ensures a better investigation, and increases the likelihood the parent will actually face charges for their actions.