The journey from there to here

Duke University, a prestigious institution of higher learning, is going through a very public shame right now. Several members of its lacrosse team are being investigated for the rape of an exotic dancer they hired to perform at a party they were attending. 

Now, before I proceed, let me be VERY clear. The actions of the Duke lacrosse team, if true, are completely and utterly inexcusable. These vermin (I refuse to call them men; they proved themselves unworthy of the title and disgraced their university in the process) have noone to blame for their actions but themselves. But there is a valuable lesson to be learned here, and it is one I intend to teach my daughters as they age into adolescence. 

That lesson is a very simple one, and one passed on to me from generations prior: if you don't play with fire, you won't get burned. If that exotic dancer had chosen another profession, or even confined her activities to a public place where a bouncer could have thrown the riffraff to the pavement, this whole horrible incident could have been avoided, and this young lady would not have to forever bear the scars of such a horrible and despicable incident. 

Now, I could launch into a whole diatribe about the stripping profession, but I have known many strippers, and the vast majority of them are decent, honorable women who are trying to earn a living and quickly discovered that men would pay them better money to take their clothes off than they could make in most other sectors of employment in their communities. While some of these ladies have certainly fallen into drug addiction and prostitution, many more of them are quite more "normal" than you might expect, and their stories are often compelling. The problem isn't in the stripping profession, but in its patrons. 

This incident and the recent murder of the young woman in New York City have a common denominator: both could have been prevented, had these young ladies been more aware of the dangers to which they were exposing themselves. While they certainly had a right to be where they were and do what they were doing, it wasn't necessarily a wise choice. I have a right to hula dance on top of a frozen lake, but if the ice is too thin and cracks, all the rights in the world aren't going to save me from the consequences. 

The sad, and honest truth is that there are dangerous predators out there. Unfortunately, they don't carry warning labels and you can't tell who they are until they actually act on their impulses. They will search for victims wherever they can find them, so the trick is, not to be where they are "hunting". We need to teach our young ladies not to patronize the places these vermin frequent; while they will still continue to search for victims, it would help if we would show our ladies how to ensure THEY aren't the victims.


Comments
on Mar 31, 2006
Assuming that the men are guilty:

If that exotic dancer had chosen another profession, or even confined her activities to a public place where a bouncer could have thrown the riffraff to the pavement, this whole horrible incident could have been avoided, and this young lady would not have to forever bear the scars of such a horrible and despicable incident.


Why on earth would you blame the victim??
on Mar 31, 2006
shades,

I put so many disclaimers in it, I truly can't see how you came to the conclusion. But you simply can't escape the fact that we SHOULD be teaching our young ladies to steer clear of these beasts. It is not, and never will be, the woman's fault (if the men are guilty). But it was an avoidable tragedy. Just as many cases of lung cancer are an avoidable tragedy. Just as many cases of diabetes and heart disease are avoidable tragedies. And we are being irresponsible if we aren't teaching out young people HOW to avoid them.

Now, I'm not even going to go so far and say the woman's profession brought it on. The fact is, many exotic dancers are pretty clear that their act does NOT include sexual favors. If she was employed by someone else, that someone should have provided her with a couple of beefed up bodyguards to keep these things from happening, and if she was working for herself, it might not be a bad idea to split the take with someone big enough to control these imbeciles. There WERE ways to have minimized the odds of this kind of thing happening.
on Mar 31, 2006
I don't think he's really trying to blame the victim as much as get everyone to think about the consequences of their choices. You are more vulnerable to this kind of attack as a stripper than you would be if you were a cashier at the grocery store. It doesn't mean that the victim deserved to be raped. It just means that other women should think about the potential consequences of their career choices.

There is such a thing as putting yourself in harms way.
on Mar 31, 2006

While we cannot eliminate the sex industry, or its inherant dangers, we can try to protect our loved ones from entering into it.  Some occupations in this world carry greater dangers than others.  That is the nature of work.  And usually those occupations are paid in accordance to the danger.  All too often, the young people, seeing the dollars, take those jobs because they have no concept of mortality.  We cannot change that.  We can only hope to modify it with those around us so they avoid them.

Being rich is nice.  Being dead or in this case violated is not worth it.

on Mar 31, 2006
That's actually why I support legalized prostitution, Dr. Guy. While I don't condone the actions, I find it shameful that a murdered prostitute is all too often not treated with the seriousness of anyone else who is the victim of such a horrendous crime.
on Mar 31, 2006
In the end the sex industry is about victimization. Period. Some people are just willing to be treated like discarded kleenex for money.

This lady didn't ask for or deserve this by any means, but the sex industry in general is expanding our utter inability to control ourselves. You can go now, I have no doubt, and rent a movie that would exactly reenact what happened here; at least sufficiently enough that the imagination could do the rest.

It is a matter of expectation. When people get their sexual education from real life, they have real life expectations of what women want and need. When people get their sexual education from pornography, they're taught that they are the crux of all sexual situations, and their will is what is important. Women are shown just doing whatever the man wants.

It's time to admit that we are creating this generation of rapists and child molesters. I've got a blog about half written on it, and I'm angry, frankly.
on Mar 31, 2006
Having answered a help line at a domestic violence shelter--it irritates me to no end when people blame the victim. "Why didn't she just leave?" "What did she expect working at that party?" "Why did she wear such a short skirt?"

I don't care if a woman exoctic dances in the middle of Main St stark naked--it does not give any man the right to violate her. Why aren't we concerned about the "natural consequences of the choices" made by the rapists?
on Mar 31, 2006

I don't care if a woman exoctic dances in the middle of Main St stark naked--it does not give any man the right to violate her. Why aren't we concerned about the "natural consequences of the choices" made by the rapists?

I never said, or even implied, that it EVER gave the man the right, shades. But are you seriously advocating encouraging women to dance nude on Main Street just to assert their right?

I made it pretty clear, I thought. These men are animals, and vermin, and rightly labelled "predators". The best way to avoid a predator is to stay OUT of the jungle, if at all possible.

The young lady in New York had all the right in the world to be out at 3:00 in the morning. But suddenly, those rights don't matter because she's dead. Same with Natalee Holloway. Nothing can EVER bring these women back, and for you to advocate their right to dance naked on Main Street just because they CAN is irresponsible.

Let me repeat this, shades: you are 100% right. These women have the RIGHT to be doing what they're doing. They did not deserve what happened to them IN ANY WAY. I am not arguing, and never have argued, that they deserve it. I am arguing that they could have PREVENTED it. And that we need to teach our young ladies HOW to prevent it. Heck, in the Duke case, it is possible that a simple self defense course or a can of mace could have kept this from happening.

on Mar 31, 2006
I have know a few exotic dancers in my life and they usually have some muscle on the job with them to prevent what "MIGHT" HAVE HAPPENED TO THIS ACCUSER.

In no way shape or form is she responsible for the actions of rapist, but {yep the dreaded but}she put herself in a highly sexually charged atmosphere with a bunch of male "kids" and jocks at that.
on Mar 31, 2006
" don't care if a woman exoctic dances in the middle of Main St stark naked--it does not give any man the right to violate her. Why aren't we concerned about the "natural consequences of the choices" made by the rapists?"


You're right. And people who go to Iraq to help the people there shouldn't be beheaded. People who walk through the projects at night shouldn't have to worry about getting mugged. People who fall into the lion exhibit at the zoo shouldn't have to worry about getting eaten.

But... then life has its little realities as well. I will be the first to say that crime is never the victim's fault. The people who behead others, the people who rape, the people who mug are all totally to blame, and nothing that the victim does should have any bearing on how we judge them.

That said, I'm sick to death of people using this guilt trip on people who simply point out the fact that THIS IS WHAT HUMAN BEINGS DO. It's wrong, it's brutal, and its awful, but humans are brutal, awful creatures. Welcome to the real friggin world.

So, in short, no one is to blame for you getting beheaded in Iraq other than the guy with the knife, but if you don't want to risk being beheaded, don't go to places where people get snatched off the street and beheaded. That's a no-brainer for most people, but when you put the same logic to getting naked with a bunch of testosterone-crazed adolescents you're villified for pointing it out.

No one is saying "That's what you get." What we are saying is "That's what people do". You don't deserve to be raped, if it happens it is a crime, but if you look at the reality of the human race you should EXPECT to be. When we advise people to lock their doors we aren't saying they deserve to be burglerized if they don't. It's reality.
on Apr 04, 2006
Incident specific Information follows;

In North Carolina the only legal exotic dancing is proformed in a very regulated, licensed facility, by licensed proformers.

The dancer in question is what is known as a "freelancer" and was secured through a "Escort Service" that has always been associated with prostitution...but she probably didn't know that, so it's her booking agent/pimp's fault.

There is more to the tale; a phone call to 911 earlier in the evening in question, alledging racial slurs, has been traced to a location miles away from the house in question....

Perhaps, before a rush to judgement against 47 highly disiplined, educated,and wealthy young men, who were drunk and vulnerable, one should at least consider the potential for a opportunistic scam being launched.....

I live around here, and it's not like the rest of the world, it is pervasive in our community to "game" the system, "getting paid" relates to getting over.Insurance fraud, Medicare fraud, Workers Comp fraud, embezzlement, and even rape and murder are all framed in a cultural context, and the race card is played so often it's pathetic.
on Apr 04, 2006
There's something even more fishy that that, really. No escort service sends women out unescorted. I knew a guy who lived in an even more rural part of NC, and when he called escort services they always had a guy outside sitting in the car. He's lived everywhere, and he told me when I asked him that he has never, ever seen an escort service send someone alone to a party.

With dancerst that don't do the... well, extras, the guy comes inside to make sure extras don't happen. I find it very, very strange that she was there alone. I have several suspicions, but I have to respect the victim enough not to yap about them when I don't have any proof.
on Apr 05, 2006
Baker,
I agree with you on respecting the alledged victim, but how about the same treatment for the alledged offenders?

They have already been tried and convicted in the court of public opinion ( at least in the public, I'd hazzard a guess that many more share my doubts but are afraid to voice them in fear of being tagged a racist )
on Apr 05, 2006
Gid,
I agree with the gist of your article, this is a great lesson for all to learn the old adage" When you lie down with dogs, you're bound to get fleas", and that potentially applies to the alledged offenders as well as the alledged victim.

BUT, the true shame is when Duke is bullied into offering their nationally ranked Lacrosse Team up for sacrifice on the alter of "Political Correctness".

My belief is that the school abandoned their responsibility to the team ( withholding judgement ). Until there are formal charges, all we have is inflamatory rumour. The media have stirred this up because nobody from the team will make a statement. ( They appear to have good counsel )
on Apr 05, 2006
No escort service sends women out unescorted. I knew a guy who lived in an even more rural part of NC, and when he called escort services they always had a guy outside sitting in the car. He's lived everywhere, and he told me when I asked him that he has never, ever seen an escort service send someone alone to a party.


I've never heard this before...remember Heidi Fleiss? When I read about that case there was never any mention of a "body guard" going out with her girls. Do you think its standard practice though? I somehow doubt it. My thinking is if a person, or business, is willing to pimp a woman out...they aren't exactly concerned about HER well being.