Bill O'Reilly on his radio show the other day detailed a school where the teacher wanted to stage a mock trial of President Bush for war crimes. The principal gave to thumbs up to the action.
O'Reilly's take was, of course, that this shouldn't happen. But this is one area where I disagree pretty strongly.
I say that we should let them have the trial. Let them debate, let them discuss, and let both sides bring evidence for the prosecution and the defense. Its potential value as a teaching tool far exceeds the controversy it brings with it.
One of the most cherished rights we have as citizens is our right to freedom of speech. Our right to discuss these things, to ask the hard questions we need to ask of our leaders. High school debate teams ask harder questions all the time, and those questions are often just as controversial.
Our leaders are not, and have never been, above the law. George W. Bush is no exception, and the questions about war crimes should be asked, not only in the high school class room but in the legislative chambers of our country's leaders. Bush may be entirely innocent of those charges, and should be assumed to be so until/unless a court has determined otherwise. But asking the question of itself is hardly treasonous; it is exactly the action we should expect of a free society.