The journey from there to here

Now, I sat down today and did a rough figure of my taxes. As I played with the numbers, I realized that it would probably take me better than 40 hours to complete my returns, and that I did not have those 40 hours to give (what with First Responder training and Paralegal training, as well as the campaign...I'm simply swamped). There's simply too much to do.

So I took it to a tax preparer, and instead, spent 2 hours answering questions (I could have netted a bigger return myself because of how she figured things, but again...that's considering time I simply DO NOT have). The refund I'm receiving made me quite POSITIVE that I actually paid in well more in taxes than what I received in a refund...but I digress. It was a fairly painless process, but I was almost floored by one of the questions towards the end of the session.

You see, the tax return had identified me as eligible for certain government programs, and asked if I would like government information on applying for those programs.

To say the least, I was shocked. I said "no", as I am personally against entitlements, and try to avoid ANY sort of publicly funded welfare. But I was somewhat surprised the question would even be asked.

One of my oppositions to these government programs is that local and county governments often use participation in these programs as "identifiers" for families they feel might need further "services". If you receive WIC, or you receive food stamps, you've pretty much flagged your family, as far as the government is concerned. It's simply not worth the dollar value of the benefits you receive to put your family through that (frankly, I'm sorta glad this is the case; if there weren't such concerns, I might be tempted to compromise my position in this area).

But I'm becoming increasingly concerned that we are entering an era where the government will FORCE you to receive these entitlements.

 


Comments
on Feb 14, 2006
I agree they will start forcing you to recieve them.  And you are right about the markers.  When I worked at DOE one of my projects was to link WIC with Free School Lunches so they could see who was getting WIC and not free Lunches.  The end result being that they would 'suggest' to the parents that they apply for the lunches.
on Feb 14, 2006
With the government sharing more and more information and becoming a big socialist relational database, it should be seen as a problem. People like Hillary think that "It takes a village", but unfortunately the village she wants to impose on us, whether she admits it or not, is a monstrous federal machine.

What happens when the busybodies want to make sure your kids are getting a healthy diet (whether you agree on 'healthy' or not)? They can toss a query to the old DB and pull all the folks on WIC and Food Stamps in their local area and they wander off to just "check in" in a faux-neighborly kind of way.

They could do this now, but as these databases become more and more tangled, it gets easier. The income tax form is becoming one-stop shopping for people to find out things about you. They have where you work, how long you've worked there, how many kids you have, and your deductions are a goldmind of information.
on Feb 14, 2006
damn it!!! take this money!! I know better than you how much help you need!!

how's that for my best hillary imitation?
on Feb 14, 2006

People like Hillary think that "It takes a village",

That is only because they dont want to be left out as the village idiot.

on Feb 15, 2006
Your tax preparer was just trying to educate people on the benefits to which they are entitled. The byzantine bureaucracy that is our beloved government makes it almost impossible to find out information on your own. It's helpful for people to know what their benefits are, whether they want them or are morally opposed to them!

Besides, the bigger government means more federal, state, and local jobs for everybody!

"I oppose big government..." this coming from a federal employee. (And you, a guy running for state representative, I might remind you.)
on Feb 15, 2006

"I oppose big government..." this coming from a federal employee. (And you, a guy running for state representative, I might remind you.)

actually, legislators are required to RUN the government. I am seriously considering adopting a plan to give all monies received outside of travel and lodging expenses to and in Austin to a favorite charity if elected.

If I get elected, I guarantee I will do as much in my power to try to shrink the size of the state government. That very fact may be my biggest liability in running, though

Your tax preparer was just trying to educate people on the benefits to which they are entitled.

The tax PREPARER didn't make the suggestion; it was automatically included in the software, most likely because of some federal mandate.