The journey from there to here

OK, so I'm way late to the game. But as a strong Douglas Adams afficianado (have read Dirk Gently and watched Dr. Who as well, so my credentials are strong here!), I feel that, now that I've seen the movie, I not only can, but MUST respond to it!

First off, the cast: Arthur Dent was decidedly Arthur Dent-ish. Good call on that one. Ford Prefect...well, I didn't have any hard image of Ford Prefect, so he wasn't badly done. Trillian was well cast, and seemed at home in the role. And Zaphod was very zaphod in his mannerisms, let's just say that. The Vogons were appropriately designed to the books description as something that had not so much evolved, but rather congealed. Marvin, however, was a disappointment.

The standard complaint about excellent movies made into books also applies here: they missed a LOT! And they also deviated significantly from the book. I was especially disappointed in the ending, during which the screenwriters apparently felt compelled to pander to the idea of wrapping everything up in a nice, neat little package rather than follow the book (to me a surprising development since Adams has such a strong cult following that is intensely familiar with the book).

The movie was decent eye candy, though, and was family friendly. My kids absolutely enjoyed it. While I will watch it again and found it surprisingly more entertaining than most of the reviews I've read, it won't be making any "best of" lists on my part.

Even the harshest critics of the film expressed some enjoyment of the song, and I have to agree with them. I think my kids could watch the video endlessly. Catchy tune, that!


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Jan 28, 2006
You didn't think Zaphod was just a bad George Bush impression? To me they leaned way too hard on the "President" role and not nearly as hard as they should have on the "Rock Star" aspect of Zaphod. They just seemed to make him a bumbling stoner, and not the character from the book.
on Jan 28, 2006

They just seemed to make him a bumbling stoner, and not the character from the book.

Yeah, I guess so. But they DID hit on the rockstar aspect a LITTLE bit in the "news briefing" (the camera shots of zaphod on the hilltop that were strongly reminiscent of '80's videos). Actually, I didn't really see it as a bad Bush impression, but I guess that's a matter of interpretation.

It was a disappointing movie overall, for a fan of the book, though. I won't deny that for a second.

on Jan 28, 2006
I hadn't read the books at all when I saw the movie. And even then I was pretty disappointed. But then when I read the books. . .

Needless to say, I won't be watching it again. But then again, I won't be reading the books again either. Couldn't stand them.
on Jan 28, 2006

I didn't have any hard image of Ford Prefect, so he wasn't badly done.


It's not the actor's fault, but it was the wrong actor.

The major joke about Ford Prefect was that he looked completely English, and a little bit too English. People looked at him and thought that something was odd, but they could not tell what it was.

A black rapper-type speaking with a New York accent living in a small English town is not that guy.

This is Ford Prefect:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/hitchhikers/gallery/images/1024/fordprefect.html

And this is him with Zaphod:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/hitchhikers/gallery/images/1024/fordzaphod.html

And with Arthur:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/hitchhikers/gallery/images/1024/arthurford.html

Prosser:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/hitchhikers/gallery/images/1024/fordprosser.html
on Jan 28, 2006
Zaphod's second head should have been visible.

It was a running gag in the Guide that Zaphod was indeed identified by the number of his heads (many life forms have more than two heads).

"Who do you think you are? Zaphod Beeblebrox?"

"Yeah, count the heads."

"You ARE Zaphod Beeblebrox."


Trillian was exactly right in the movie.

And Martin Freeman ("Tim") was the best possible choice for Arthur.
on Jan 28, 2006
You didn't think Zaphod was just a bad George Bush impression?


Hahahahahaha. That's what I thought (although I didn't think it was a bad impression!). He looks like the lead singer from NickelBack and acted like Bush. Hehe.

We rented the movie a while back and we all fell asleep not too far into it. I don't know if it was good or not. Meh. I don't even feel compelled to rent it again so that I can see the ending.
on Jan 28, 2006
It was a cute film. My kids loved it. I even enjoyed it, despite the fact that I'd seen the show, read the books, listened to the radio shows, etc. I have been a fan since seeing it on PBS in the early 80's. This film was a whole-hearted attempt to recreate the books and the makers' intentions were in the right place. You could tell they were fans.

Trillian was exactly right in the movie.
And Martin Freeman ("Tim") was the best possible choice for Arthur.

Yep, great use of Zooey Deschanel. She was fantastic and dead-on.
Martin Freeman? Perfect everyman thrust into unsettling situations, thoroughly sublime casting on his part.

As for Sam Rockwell,
Actually, I didn't really see it as a bad Bush impression, but I guess that's a matter of interpretation.

According to the filler... I mean, the special features, Sam Rockwell said he was going for a Bill Clinton/Elvis thing. He really went wide of the mark on that one.

My favorite lines from (exclusively) the movie: "You can't be President with a whole brain." And "Buttons aren't toys."

All in all, I enjoyed "Hitchhiker's", though it did not live up to my expectations.
on Jan 29, 2006
Zaphod's second head should have been visible.


Thanks. I thought both heads were visible, but wanted to go back and check before I spoke on THAT issue, at least (it's been awhile since I've read the books).

You didn't think Zaphod was just a bad George Bush impression?


Hahahahahaha. That's what I thought (although I didn't think it was a bad impression!). He looks like the lead singer from NickelBack and acted like Bush. Hehe.


Actually, it did seem derivative to me...but of Owen Wilson's character in Zoolander, not of W.
on Jan 29, 2006
Yep, great use of Zooey Deschanel. She was fantastic and dead-on.
Martin Freeman? Perfect everyman thrust into unsettling situations, thoroughly sublime casting on his part.


Yes, she did create a Trillian that I wouldn't have minded chasing across the galaxy after
on Jan 29, 2006
The Hitchhiker's Guide book series was one of my favorite book series when I was in high school (many, many moons ago), and I still have a great love for it. I was excited about a big screen version...and then I nearly walked out of it, it was so bad. As a matter of fact, for me it was the single worst movie of 2005. Only Alan Rickman's voice as Marvin the Paranoid Android and Bill Nighy as Slartibartfast made it semi-tolerable. The rest was just awful. Worst of all was taking Zaphod Beeblebrox, an extremely funny and likeable character, and turning him into a completely obnoxious buffoon. Sam Rockwell is an okay guy, but the character as envisioned for the movie was just way off the mark.

If I want to see a good live action production of Hitchhiker's Guide, all I've got to do is pull out my DVD copy of the BBC miniseries and have at it .
on Jan 29, 2006

If I want to see a good live action production of Hitchhiker's Guide, all I've got to do is pull out my DVD copy of the BBC miniseries and have at it .


I hear you. Except the BBC Trillian, of course. She was rubbish.
on Jan 29, 2006
I hear you. Except the BBC Trillian, of course. She was rubbish.


Maybe we need to do some digital editing with Zooey Daschenal, and get a perfect compromise
on Jan 29, 2006
Maybe we need to do some digital editing with Zooey Daschenal, and get a perfect compromise

You get the best of all possible worlds. Could we edit out Mark Wing-Davey's mullets, though? Please?
on Jan 29, 2006
Worst of all was taking Zaphod Beeblebrox, an extremely funny and likeable character, and turning him into a completely obnoxious buffoon.


You DO have a point there. There's NO way Trillian would have run off with the arrogant airhead the movie presented.
on Jan 30, 2006
Actually, it wasn't Alan Rickman doing Marvin's voice, although that's what I had thought when I first saw the movie. It was Warwick Davis, the guy who played Willow.
2 Pages1 2