The journey from there to here

Saturday, we had a meeting at the paper office (I currently work as a "media distribution specialist", or, "paper carrier" for the non-PC among you). We were discussing updates in our pay rates. One of the main changes is that the paper plans to eliminate the gas adjustment that many of us rural carriers get for delivering the paper out along the county roads to the farmhouses that dot the countryside.

Now, to be frank, I NEED that gas adjustment to make any profit on two of my eight routes, which are rural. The news was not at ALL good to me, and I had to try to do something or find myself with great difficulty making ends meet.

In times past I might have stormed off and left the job entirely. I have a good work history and could find other menial work without a whole lot of difficulty. I also might have railed on about the injustice, how "the man", in this case, the paper, was trying to oppress the workers and made my little Che Guevara rant my cause celebre.

But I didn't do either. What I DID do, I believe, illustrated how my understanding of how the world works has changed and how that change stands to benefit myself and my family for generations to come.

See, I grabbed a sheet of paper and listed the number of customers on my two routes. I then calculated my daily pay rate and subtracted the gas needed to run the routes. When I was finished, the numbers spoke clearly, and they were grim. I would be making $1.80 for 70 minutes' work on one route, after gas was figured in but before other operating costs. I would be making $1.17 on the other route for 20 minute's work, again after gas but before other operating costs. To drive my point home further, I listed 7 MAJOR advertisers on the route that the paper might stand to lose if they affected the service to those customers. By 2:00 yesterday afternoon, my gas adjustment was restored.

See, I have a lot to learn, but I have learned that in order to improve your status, you need to speak the LANGUAGE of the businesspeople you serve. To them, the bottom line is vitally important, as it should be; they are paid to run a business. If you can show them how a decision can affect their bottom line positively or negatively, they can often be enticed to change their outlook.

The problem is, most of the poor aren't taught that. And that, I believe, is the chief cause of generational poverty. The poor have lived the past 100+ years awaiting the glorious socialist revolution that many believe will liberate them from the chains of poverty, and believing that the principal causes for their misfortunes are the "evil capitalists".

The problem is, the ones who have taught this to their children haven't seen their children liberated from the shackles of poverty. The children continue on in the same misguided mindset and learn to hope for a "saviour" (usually in the form of the government) to rescue them from the mire.

I don't ever expect to be abundantly rich. Frankly, it isn't one of my major life's goals. But because I have slowly begun to come to understand WHY my family has spent so much time in poverty, and WHAT I can do to change it, I believe I have a MUCH better chance of equipping my children to achieve to the fullest of their dreams.


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Dec 14, 2005
But I have seen enough poor folks in my life to know we're the exception, NOT the rule, among those
Good for you; but "the rule" could, you know, be the exception and that most do what you do.

on Dec 14, 2005
Good for you; but "the rule" could, you know, be the exception and that most do what you do.


I can't think of a single response to that comment that's not smartassed, so I'll acknowledge it and leave it at that.
on Dec 14, 2005
See, I have a lot to learn, but I have learned that in order to improve your status, you need to speak the LANGUAGE of the businesspeople you serve. To them, the bottom line is vitally important, as it should be; they are paid to run a business. If you can show them how a decision can affect their bottom line positively or negatively, they can often be enticed to change their outlook.


EXACTLY!!! I knew of this indirectly, but many of the places I worked really didn't care for my opinion requardless of what language I spoke (that is when you know it is a dead end job and you need to get out). I really learned economics in grad school. From marginal perencity to spend to what the term under-employeed means, I know what businesses want (other than an employee who is trustworthy of which leads to my next point)

The problem is, most of the poor aren't taught that. And that, I believe, is the chief cause of generational poverty. The poor have lived the past 100+ years awaiting the glorious socialist revolution that many believe will liberate them from the chains of poverty, and believing that the principal causes for their misfortunes are the "evil capitalists".

The problem is, the ones who have taught this to their children haven't seen their children liberated from the shackles of poverty. The children continue on in the same misguided mindset and learn to hope for a "saviour" (usually in the form of the government) to rescue them from the mire.


This is what I was tying to say many times over, but I guess I didn't use the right words. Poor people can work very hard, try very hard and so forth, but thinking like a business person sees to always be lacking. Knowing what your employer wants even if it griefs you to do it means that you can have a wealtheir future (either there or somewhere else). Coming to work early, everyday and being trustworthy gets you epople who will sponcer you for higher positions, and even a reference for better jobs.

How many poor people try to get references from co-workers and managers? Many think it is kissing up (especially doing what your told to do for some reason... I don't get that one) and that doing good work so that you can get something in return is some sort of suck up practice.

The bottom line is the bottom line. If you get them there (the bottom line IE making money) through good work practices, that is not kissing up (its not like your washing the mans clothes for crying out loud).





Poor people generally can do the work (and are smart enough to do it dispite IQ tests), but it is lack of education, peer pressure, environment, and most importantly mythes and rumors about 'the man' and 'the system'.
on Dec 14, 2005
Oh and another thing...

Some people, but seemingly more poor people, get frustruated at the learning proccess and getting things right.

In other words, if it takes too long to learn, self doubt comes into play (as well as laziness). Knowing that it might take you longer than someone else shouldn't be a sour note in learning it. Once you learn it, be the best at it.

Hear in America, being called dumb seems to be a problem so looking like it will take you longer to understand something (another myth) means your stupid and that you won't get it right ever.

See what I mean about mythes?
on Dec 14, 2005
In other words, if it takes too long to learn, self doubt comes into play (as well as laziness). Knowing that it might take you longer than someone else shouldn't be a sour note in learning it. Once you learn it, be the best at it.


The above statement is so true. From my experience, self-doubt and the learning process starts in JRHS. Not sure why other then a sub-social issues of acceptance come to light during this period. The discouraging element is it keeps evolving until it's ingrained in some personalities, while not in others. I remember kids making fun of me when raising my hand to asking a question. The teasing really grew if I asked for "further" clarification. At that point, everybody knew I wasn't understanding. Sometimes I wouldn't ask just because. Yet, many others didn't understand either and didn't want to ask out of social fear.

That all changed for me after HS... Early on in business I would ask so many questions, it was annoying to my first boss. I would remind him that my questions were his insurance. Knowing as much as possible made him look good. I am still that way to day...but back in my 30's I learned I had a low level of ADD. You wouldn't believe how learning that answered so many other questions for me on different levels.

Hear in America, being called dumb seems to be a problem so looking like it will take you longer to understand something (another myth) means your stupid and that you won't get it right ever.


I don't equate learning to being "poor", especially since I was poor. Furthermore, poor comprehension relates to the "amount of information feed during a time period, there by causing frustration for many. White collar professionals have the same obstacle, just referenced differently. Back in the 70's we learned the hierarchy of "every" employee rises to his level of "incompetence". We could say otherwise, he's reached his a information limit. We referred to it as the "Peter Principle".

True... Asking questions = learning... To many questions = not learning quick enough. Which leads to a rather common statement we use in measuring talent. We know "everybody" is capable of learning any given subject. The more important variable and subjective question is "how long" (since time is money) will it take a person to comprehend the subject matter.

18 holes of golf is a great measure of man's learning process and historically known to be a microcosm of his life. I agree with this statement and use it as often as possible when interviewing talent.
2 Pages1 2