The journey from there to here

I have a memory that lasts longer than the past week.

And I can recall that Hurricane Katrina had scarcely passed the tip of Florida and made her turn to the north before the New Orleans mayor ORDERED everyone out of New Orleans.

Now, I admit to being a little less than thrilled with the concept of "mandatory evacuations", but that's the point for another article, not this one. The fact is, the residents of New Orleans had ample warning to get their heinies out of the city.

Some may have been unable to make the move. The city set up shelter at the Superdome for many of those individuals, yet many STILL chose to stay in their homes.

And yet, every night, I see helicopters flying from rooftop to rooftop of homes in which residents have been trapped in the attic or have climbed out on the rooftop and thus imperiled themselves further as they are fully at the mercy of the elements. The resources of helicopters, which could well be used to distribute aid to shelters desperately in need of supplies, are being appropriated for single person rescues because of the value we as a society place on human life. While such value is noble, it seems it would be in our best interests to consider the needs of the many over the needs of the few (damn, I hate quoting Spock in an article!).

The fact is, far too many of these people that we are spending valuable time anbd resources in saving are there because of their own stupidity. Maybe it's my naivete, but I'd figure anyone able bodied enough to climb up into their attic and onto their rooftop is able bodied enough to get their butt down to emergency shelter or, better yet, out of town. The TRUE tragic losses, those of the handicapped and elderly, won't even begin to be discovered until the flooding is brought under control.

I can't say what the answer is, but I have a lot of disgust for those selfish individuals who thought only of themselves and are consuming a disproportionate share of our time and/or resources because of their own foolishness. They should be eternally grateful that our government doesn't base its decisions on who to help on the intelligence of one's actions.


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Sep 04, 2005
"Any military person would lie to save his Commander-in-Chief's ass... Can you prove he isn't?"


Someone accuses someone of lying, and then claims the burden of proof is on the person accused? LOL. That's insipid, even for you.

I don't want to hear any of our closet radicals say anything about the press and Natalie Holloway ever again. They've certainly turned a few square miles into the Natalie Holloway of this disaster. Worse, they've done it not because they give a damn, but because it lends to their politics.
on Sep 04, 2005
I am to busy spending 30,000 to remodle my 4year old home to give anything to the stupid, I gace at the office,. I do not want to have to be coerced to give, we give because we want to.
on Sep 04, 2005
Increasing the funding for New Orleans would not have stopped what happened. The Army Corp of Engineers has already stated that.


oh really?

not according to this article in editor & publisher Link

it's not at all that simple as you'll learn when you find your way there to see:

When flooding from a massive rainstorm in May 1995 killed six people, Congress authorized the Southeast Louisiana Urban Flood Control Project, or SELA.

Over the next 10 years, the Army Corps of Engineers, tasked with carrying out SELA, spent $430 million on shoring up levees and building pumping stations, with $50 million in local aid. But at least $250 million in crucial projects remained, even as hurricane activity in the Atlantic Basin increased dramatically and the levees surrounding New Orleans continued to subside.

Yet after 2003, the flow of federal dollars toward SELA dropped to a trickle. The Corps never tried to hide the fact that the spending pressures of the war in Iraq, as well as homeland security -- coming at the same time as federal tax cuts -- was the reason for the strain. At least nine articles in the Times-Picayune from 2004 and 2005 specifically cite the cost of Iraq as a reason for the lack of hurricane- and flood-control dollars.


does the name al naomi ring any bells, dog?

n early 2004, as the cost of the conflict in Iraq soared, President Bush proposed spending less than 20 percent of what the Corps said was needed for Lake Pontchartrain, according to a Feb. 16, 2004, article, in New Orleans CityBusiness.

On June 8, 2004, Walter Maestri, emergency management chief for Jefferson Parish, Louisiana; told the Times-Picayune: "It appears that the money has been moved in the president's budget to handle homeland security and the war in Iraq, and I suppose that's the price we pay. Nobody locally is happy that the levees can't be finished, and we are doing everything we can to make the case that this is a security issue for us."

Also that June, with the 2004 hurricane season starting, the Corps' project manager Al Naomi went before a local agency, the East Jefferson Levee Authority, and essentially begged for $2 million for urgent work that Washington was now unable to pay for.


"The system is in great shape, but the levees are sinking. Everything is sinking, and if we don't get the money fast enough to raise them, then we can't stay ahead of the settlement," he said. "The problem that we have isn't that the levee is low, but that the federal funds have dried up so that we can't raise them."
on Sep 04, 2005
Do you have proof to back that up?


read above pls.
on Sep 04, 2005
Someone accuses someone of lying, and then claims the burden of proof is on the person accused? LOL. That's insipid, even for you.


Why shouldn't ID have to provide proof that the ACE isn't lying?
on Sep 05, 2005

But, there were a host of reasons, some quite legitimate, in my opinion.

Your life is not legitimate?  Pulease!

on Sep 05, 2005

Someone accuses someone of lying, and then claims the burden of proof is on the person accused? . That's insipid, even for you.

It is the mantra of the left.  You are guilty until proven innocent, unless you are Bill clinton.

on Sep 05, 2005

oh really?

not according to this article in editor & publisher Link

Now try a non biased source.

on Sep 05, 2005
It is the mantra of the left. You are guilty until proven innocent


You mean, for instance, when the police detain someone with only the suspicion that they've done something wrong while they check out the person? Then the person checks out clean and the police let him go?
on Sep 06, 2005
Now try a non biased source.


whether you approve of the source doesn't change the facts. remember doc?

this is a perfectly objective source. wanna dispute the facts, go for it.
on Sep 06, 2005
The need to rebuild New Orleans and the Mississippi area is NOT A FICTION OF THE LEFT. It is a need that Bush turned his back on so he could fund things like the Iraq War and Tax cuts to his supporters. Bush is not in touch with the REAL NEEDS of America or what helps the vast majority of Americans!
2 Pages1 2