The journey from there to here

A recent news opinion almost made me spew my coffee across the room. Here was a state senator pushing for a sales tax on fast food, and the mandatory liberal rebuttal "but it hurts the poor" was spouted by his opponents.

Hmmm. Let's think about this, shall we? Are our constitutional rights to be construed as including a daily meal at McDonald's? The USDA doesn't seem to think so, as such purchases are not allowable with food stamps. But here we have the liberals, who demand more and more services, complaining that a sales tax applied to fast food, a luxury item if ever there was one, would unfairly jeopardize the poor.

The simple fact is, as one who has lived in those shoes, I can tell you that I can feed my ENTIRE FAMILY for less than what ONE fast food value meal costs, and some meals amount to a FRACTION of that. That's right. So if I choose the number 6 value meal, I am essentially depriving my family of one meal for my own greedy satisfaction.

Fast food actually hurts the poor by providing poor nutrition at an inflated cost. This drives up the cost of state funded health insurance programs, resulting in an increased need for tax revenue.

So, in essence, a fast food tax is ONE tax that's not inappropriate.


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on May 17, 2005
Peanuts are amazingly nutritious....


Peanuts are but, unless you buy "all natural" peanut butter, you are eating a whole lot of peanut flavored "hydrogenated oil"... in other words "Crisco". Check the label sometime.. 190 calories, 130 from fat. 2 Tbspns give you 25% of your RDA for fat.

I admit, I love Jiff, but (as a result of the year long diet) I often make my own peanut butter.
on May 17, 2005
not worth a double post
on May 17, 2005

Peanuts are but, unless you buy "all natural" peanut butter, you are eating a whole lot of peanut flavored "hydrogenated oil"... in other words "Crisco" (which is a brand name of "Trans-fat"). Check the label sometime.. 190 calories, 130 from fat. 2 Tbs give you 25% of your RDA for fat.

I don't know- I don't buy anything but all natural peanut butter.  Even though it is more expensive than "standard", it's still amazingly cheap per serving.

on May 17, 2005

Maybe they don't have stoves, refrigerators, etc.

When we moved to Texas, we brought with us an ice chest and a two burner hot plate. We were ready to ride things out until we could afford to get appliances.

What next, taxpayer funded cooking lessons?

Kind of, LW. Why not just add Home Ec BACK to the list of required subjects in schools (it's a hell of a lot more practical than some requirements).

on May 17, 2005
Even things like donuts...small cans of biscuits (3 for $1.00) can be fried in vegetable oil ( 1/4 of a bottle= about $.50) and dusted with powdered sugar, or even iced with powdered sugar creamed with a few spoonfuls of milk (a few cents worth).....netting you 30 small donuts for about $2.00, and guess what? They're yummy too.


Sounds good. Mmmmmmmmm...donuts

Hmm, so I guess they should tax something that actually gets involved in politics... hmmm ... how about Churches?


That actually doesn't sound like a bad idea.
on May 18, 2005
Oh the memories of working in a Convenient Store in Floria. I don't know how the laws there are now, but back in 85, they had to have the some of the most labor intensive Sales Taxes around.~Prepared foods were taxed, but "groceries" weren't. So, if you microwaved that burrito before you paid for it, I had to charge sales tax, if you bought it cold, then microwaved it, there was no tax.~Magazines were taxed, but newspapers weren't. The difference? Staples.~Soda Pop was not taxed, but that Mt. Dew Slushee was.The list went on and on!! ;~D


Same goes for Nebraska. Fast Food (prepared foods) have been taxed as long as I can remember. I think Iowa is the same way.
on May 18, 2005
Honestly, I don't think a tax on fast food would have any sort of impact on my family's consumption of gorditas and Big Macs. I mean, if you can't afford a dollar or two extra on your meal, you can't really afford to be eating out, anyways.

We have something interesting here in Hawaii. All cans and bottles are subject to a 5 cent fee. It's technically not a tax because you CAN turn your stuff in for a refund of that money, but in reality, most people don't bother. At first it was VERY difficult to turn the cans and bottles in (only a sparse few redemption centers with odd hours in out of the way places), but enough people complained that they began placing mini redemption centers in more accessible places.

For the majority of (lazy) people (which includes us), the 5 cent fee is really a tax. When we buy a 12 pack of soda, we pay 60 cents on top of the listed price.
on May 20, 2005
Of more concern is what they spend the tax take on. $1 fast food tax does not equal $1 in health spending and im not talking about the cost of administration either. Wouldn't it be a crazy legacy for Americas ancestors if a FAT tax funded STAR WARS.

Americas desire to eat fatty, salt and sacrin laced foods might well put laser guided missiles and other associated weaponry into space. Americans waistlines might well play a large part in delivering the funding capable of producing the kinds of next generation WMD that triggers the next global arms race.

Imagine our ancestors sitting in some mutated form, in some desolate radio active cave, knowing that the nuclear/biological wasteland that constitutes their backyard was made possible by an early 21 century Western obesity epidemic.

A bit of a stretch...no pun intended...or is it?
America might well eat us all into World War 3.
on May 20, 2005

Brick,

Excellent point. Personally, I'm in favor of "appropriate taxation" (DMV fees and traffic fines used for roads, park fees used for park services, "sin taxes" used for health care). It doesn't work that way, true, but the best argument against this tax is that it is another tax, not that it hurts the poor.

2 Pages1 2