The journey from there to here

I am working on a number of items I hope to eventually be able to present to the Libertarian Party, in the state, or hopefully, national conventions.

One of the points I am working on is why the Libertarian Party is a party of inclusion that all Americans should consider.

Interesting, isn't it, that despite years of recruiting at "hempfests" across the country, the Democrats have YET to produce serious legislation as to the legalization or decriminalization of industrial hemp, let alone Marijuana? This is because the Democrats are busy pandering to a populace they do not intend to represent. The Libertarian Party, on the other hand, has consistently supported marijuana decriminalization, along with a host of other victimless crimes.

But even more compelling is the chief issue that draws me, as a pacifist, to the LP. That is the issue of a dollar for dollar tax credit for money donated to charitable organizations. Because the LP believes that charity is the responsibility of the individual, rather than the government, this is the proposed step in removing the country from a system of government subsidized dependence. This, in effect, would allow me and others to "vote with my wallet" and send my money to aid programs rather than fund a war machine I'm rather ambivalent about.

The reason, to answer my own question, that the left does not support the Libertarian Party is that the left does not support the concept of liberty. The left envisions a world where personal responsibility is given to the government, who benignly shepherds over us. They would surrender our jobs, our individual rights, and our children to a socialist machine where free thought is a virus.

And they must be stopped. At any cost.


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on May 05, 2005
the world is not black and white and when subtle nuances shift my positions in to grey areas, that does not mean that I am a hypocrit--it means that I had to weigh what was important to me


Well said. It sounds like you're capable of finding that middle ground. Sadly, for some people it IS black and white and they are incapable of shifting their ideas as appropriate to the issue. For some it's an all the way or nothing thing. Those are the nuts IMHO.
on May 05, 2005
The problem with libertarians isn't their philosophy. The problem is their idea of how to implement their philosophies as government.

From everything I've ever learned about the Founding Fathers, I'm convinced that if they thought libertarianism would work, that's what we'd have today.
on May 05, 2005
Do you honestly believe the mess we call a government is what the founding fathers intended?
on May 05, 2005
i think they would have thrown a few revolutions over the years. But hey...That's just me!
on May 06, 2005
i think they would have thrown a few revolutions over the years. But hey...That's just me!


We do throw a revolution, every four years for president, two years for the House of Representatives and 6 years for the Senate.

But then again, wasn't it Thomas Jefferson who said, "Every generation needs a revolution"?. ;~D I would say that tossing the whole (Unconstitutional) Democrat/Republican domination of our system would be a revolution worthy of this generation.
on May 07, 2005
To me, the left's rejection of the LP is proof positive that they aren't about civil rights, they're about government imposition.

The LP espouses pretty much every civil liberty that the left claims to champion, yet they reject the LP outright. Why? Because the LP does not think it's the government's place to force people to care.

Kind of makes you sick, don't it. ;~D
on May 07, 2005

Yes, it does, para...I'm hoping to "bring down the house" in '08 with a speech I am preparing to try to advance to the national convention in which I suggest changes in the way the LP presents itself that it can/should make to bring in the disenfranchised leftists who have no political home.

I have a very busy planned schedule over the next few years.

2 Pages1 2