The journey from there to here
Published on April 13, 2005 By Gideon MacLeish In Politics

This is probably my first "gloat blog".

In the aftermath of the December 26th Tsunami, I spoke out against the US providing aid. I was blasted with every name in the book for my position that the aid should be privately funded. I, of course, wrote several followup articles defending my position.

And the kicker is, I was RIGHT!!!

Now, I'll admit, many of my political positions are subjective, and as debatable as any position held by the "big two" or the Greens. But this case was a little bit different.

When news stories rolled in about lower caste individuals being booted out of their shelters by higher caste families, the opposition grew eerily silent. When countries such as India REFUSED aid, the silence grew deafening.

It seems that I had hit the nail on the head. Oddly enough, not one retraction or apology appeared on any of my threads. And, for some people, there was much to apologize for.

Moral to this story: Just because someone takes a differing political view, doesn't necessarily mean they're wrong (it doesn't necessarily mean they're right, either).


Comments
on Apr 13, 2005
Yeah, there were a lot of knee-jerk reactions to that disaster. From my experience, it takes 24-48 hrs to really assess what will be needed for any disaster recovery operation. Any news or calls for aid before that are largely political. All the "one upmanship" and "who are giving more" crap is part of what I mean by "political". Who cares if a country gives $1 million, or even $100 million. Until we know how much, and what is needed, the money is meaningless.
on Apr 13, 2005

Just because someone takes a differing political view, doesn't necessarily mean they're wrong (it doesn't necessarily mean they're right, either).

Does that mean they are left?

on Apr 13, 2005
Methinks our attitudes have something in common. I too feel I deserve apologies when I get the boot or ridiculed and insulted when I say the truest of things. Getting an apology from the opposing forced-camp(people label no matter what) is like trying to get water from a stone. But the neat thing is how different things would be had the opposing camp listened to what we had to say.