This is one of those things that got me to thinking. While I want to remain neutral in JU feuds, I did get a little intrigued by the charges against the Buddhist practices of one of JU's members. Not a Buddhist myself, I nonetheless have had to learn to understand why I shouldn't take "you're not a good Christian" charges personally, and feel the same principles apply.
In my walk as a Christian, I have found there's no such thing as a "perfect" Christian; the closer one SAYS they are to that mark, the farther they likely are. In my somewhat limited experience with Buddhists I have found similar principles apply. Because some of the more esoteric principles of the two faiths overlap, I believe I can have some level of understanding.
"Perfection" is not a state we're likely to know in our mortal bodies. We battle constantly against our fleshly desires, and, although they're not always controlling, they always have influence. We are not immune, therefore, to outbursts of emotion that may not be desirable or representative of a "perfect" emissary of our faith, but...that's who we are.
Our "walk" as Christians, as a Buddhist's "walk" as a Buddhist, are just that; journeys that will not end until at LEAST the end of THIS lifespan (IF then; we have limited knowledge of the nature of the afterlife).
And so, I submit that the myth of a "perfect" Christian or Buddhist is just that: a MYTH. And that the standard of perfection should not be used as a weapon by our opponents.