The journey from there to here
Published on February 11, 2005 By Gideon MacLeish In Politics

Here are some cuts I propose for Bush and company for the coming year. I'm not in  all cases suggesting we do away with these departments completely, but that we seriously cut back (he said he wants to remove redundant federal agencies among other things). I'm sure most people will agree with some departments, disagree with others:

  • The Department of Homeland Security: Homeland Security should be under an already existing cabinet post, that of the Defense Department. The United States was already set up with a Homeland Security Department prior to 9/11; they're called the state National Guards. A post and a few staff at the national level to coordinate between the states is all that is needed to efficiently operate
  • The National Endowment for the Arts: Congressional pork at its finest. If pissing in a jar and putting a crucifix in it makes one an artist, call me Picasso. Seriously, though, the arts, while a vital part of our society, should be privately unerwritten. Period.
  • The National Education Association: The "other" NEA, this one is redundant in that it replicates each state's education association, and has created bureaucratic waste that has drained dollars badly needed at the consumer (student) level and appropriated them at the administrative level.
  • The BATF: A holdover from the Prohibition era, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (always wondered why they grouped those three together), has become an albatross that has cost far too much to the taxpayer. While incidents such as Waco and Ruby Ridge are now part of a bygone era, they are examples of the horrific, totalitarian control these people feel justified in exerting over U.S. citizens.
  • The Border Patrol: Laughably inefficient, these units also replicate the role the National Guards should be playing in border states. Simply eliminate them and divert part of their funding to the Guard units of border states.
  • The DEA: The "war on drugs" was an expensive lesson in how NOT to control drugs within our borders. The DEA replicates the role of other law enforcement agencies and should be done away with.
  • The EPA: We have held our environmental standards to international standards for years. Each individual state has different environmental needs, and the powers currently granted the EPA should be granted to state environmental agencies.
  • The BLM: The Bureau of Land Management should produce a plan to turn over federally held lands to state jurisdiction. Poor supervision at the federal level and a high cost to consumer make this an unnecessary expense.

I'm sure I stepped on everyone's toes somewhere in there, but I really feel these agencies need serious cuts. With a skyrocketing budget and a whole bevy of ridiculous pork barrel expenditures, it's time to tighten our collective belts.


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Feb 12, 2005

Maybe the government can cut everything. Then it may be possible to invade Iran and North Korea without raising taxes.

With no domestic spending, (besides the treasury/ IRS that collects money... and the part that pays to maintain the core government offices)we could establish a 100% war nation-state.

There may even be enough money left over to pour into Iraq and Afghanistan with kickback cash to spare for everyone involved.

This way we'll all learn how much we don't need the federal government, while at the same time achieve international objectives.

Very sarcastic.  just remember, with out a DOD, you would be speaking Russian or German instead of English.

And for the record, please cite the part of the constitution that says we should have all these programs?

on Feb 12, 2005

If border patrol is put in the hands of the Guard, does that mean that its only illegal immigration one weekend a month and one two week stint a year.

Very sarcsatic and funny.  And a good point.

on Feb 12, 2005

The NEA is the national teachers' union. I don't think that government bankrolls unions.

OK, so I'll take a "mia culpa" on that one. But the intent remains pure. I do think that education is a role that should fall on the states.

on Feb 12, 2005

If border patrol is put in the hands of the Guard, does that mean that its only illegal immigration one weekend a month and one two week stint a year. Do you realize this would actually cost more money to activate those units and would also disallow them from performing their military duties. They would also need training time. In that time period we would have no border patrol. Its not the job of the states to guard the borders.

First, it's not impossible to conceive of a "full time" status for a minority of Guard members for that purpose. My contention was that we need to replace the grossly inefficient (and, from many inside reports, largely CORRUPT) border patrol. While your points are good, it makes sense that you would have a "transition period" while you prepared the state units to take over these roles.

on Feb 12, 2005
What I would like to know is how much of the federal government would be cut if we stuck the concept in the Consitution that if the Constitution does not explicity give the federal governement power over something that it is left to the states authority (or is my Constitutional knowledge wrong?)
2 Pages1 2