The journey from there to here
And it's a World of Dread and Fear
Published on August 28, 2004 By Gideon MacLeish In Politics
OK, time to put my "liberal" hat on.

For those who don't notice, I have stolen a line from one of the greatest Christmas songs of all time ("Do They Know It's Christmas?") for this blog.

As the Republicans are settling in for their national convention, they are sending their message out in a city whose homeless problems are legendary. Where a former mayor once proposed putting the homeless in jail that refused to go into the shelters.

George W. Bush will speak, most likely, on the thousands of lives lost less than five miles away on September 11, 2001. But the thousands he will refer to will be the almost 3,000 known to have perished in the tower and surrounding area; not of the estimated thousands who called the subway station below the towers home.

He will speak of an economy that is growing and of a better standard of living as gas prices remain at or above $2.00 a gallon in many parts of the country, and certain grocery items have experienced double digit inflation over the past year. He will also speak on this as the standard of living has dropped for many Americans and countless thousands are hovering on the brink of homelessness. It is ridiculous to think that the economy is entirely his fault; it is equally ridiculous for him to hide his head in the sand and proclaim that "prosperity is just around the corner" while millions of us know better.

He will speak of the tax cuts that his administration has provided, without acknowledging that those tax cuts have crippled many social programs without providing ample replacement for those programs, and have not addressed the corporate welfare that has historically been supported by his party.

He will speak on the sanctity of life before conception, while holding in low regard the sanctity of life AFTER conception.

He will speak of the war on terror while the chief terrorists remain at large.

He will speak on the protection of marriage as defined between a man and a woman while endorsing economic policies that threaten to undermine the stability of those marriages.

He will speak of the "dishonorable service" of a man who received three purple hearts while defending his own honor as he remained stateside to avoid the war.

He will speak a message of hope while implementing policies that have removed that hope for so many.

respectfully submitted,

Gideon MacLeish

Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Aug 31, 2004
Gideon,

I am so glad I have been drawn to your blogs as you write so well, have a great outlook and communicate well the aspects we face in life and I am sure your opinion aids and informs others for desicions we face in our society today.

It's reasuring to have people like yourself around, Gideon.
on Sep 01, 2004
If I search your blog will I find a similar article that took place at the time of the DNC?


No, although if you have read most of my pieces you know that I have had a good deal to say about the democratic party. Try "Kerry: The Environmentalist's Choice?" for one, even though it only addresses one part of their platform. You may also want to archive blogs such as "Two Americas, Huh?", or the one that encourages the poor to take responsibility for themselves (I can't remember the exact title, but "Responsibility" is part of it). So, if you're trying to ask if I've covered both sides of the fence on this one, yes, I have.

There is NO civic responsibility to encourage. There is civic charity. You are NOT responsible for MY plight, and I would refuse your or anyone's help because taking that help causes a greater plight. My own devaluation. Read: "I am less without your help." This is the hidden outcome of "social" thinking. Well - not so hidden - go talk to some russians.


OK. If I were to take your angle of refusing any outside help, I would be homeless, after we would have trekked as a family 8 miles through the desert just to get close enough to the businesses for me to ever have hope of having a job again. Of course, I wouldn't be able to get a job, because I would have no access to showers, and, oh, yeah, we'd probably be dead right now because it's pretty damned impossible to survive in 100 plus degree heat with no access to water.

I am personally glad that you gave birth to yourself, and immediately set about earning your own way so your parents didn't get you into a socialist mindset by things like feeding you and clothing you, but most of us aren't so gifted. If you chose to refuse my help, fine. I'd be happy to assist someone who needs it.

Here's a clue, Ockhams...while we're two weeks from homelessness (I am filling out 5-10 job applications a day and interviewing with anyone who will give me an interview) don't you fucking talk to me about what kind of lack of moral character you think I have because I show up at the food bank, ok?

As for the rest of the article, it was about 5-6 points slanted to make Republicans seem like hypocrites with absolutely no representation of democrats being hypocritical, too. Saying it after the fact in a response doesn't count.I think I read every bit of your article. The part in the words, and the part between the lines. What is NOT said is as much a part of a statement as what is said. There was a LOT you did not say, and whether you like it or not, it gave me offense.


It's an op/ed piece. DEAL with it.

Try for original and equal thought if you're just sitting around one day and feel like a new experience. The only discussion you got (I don't count people drooling "insightful" on you for saying something that has been said a billion times already as "discussion") was from me. And your "encouragement" of it was to tell me you thought it was harsh and that I had not read your article properly.As for harsh, I found your intimating that ANY man holds in low regard the sanctity of anyone's life to be harsh. And irresponsible. And wrong. And Self-righteous. I would never say this of Bush, Kerry, or anyone I know but a psychotic. It is an ignorant implication for which you are directly responsible. By saying these and other things in this public format you have dropped the pebble in the pond. You are now responsible for the ripples. Are you 100% sure your logic is sound or did maybe the excitement of this public format occlude momentarily the very real responsibility of the effect it has?


I wrote what I felt

Why?


Because, unlike you, apparently, I realize that others have valid contributions to a thread, even if I disagree with them.

on Sep 01, 2004
Sorry Gid, but i have to agree, its just a rewarmed version of the typical liberal line, unoriginal and without basis in fact. (i love you too, buddy, but in a different way, heh)


No, LW...my "line" is hardly the liberal line. My criticisms of Kerry and the Democrats are in the archives to be found, you know this.

I'll point out one more time...as Bush has not acted alone these last 4 years, neither will Kerry if elected. There is no magic wand. Anything Kerry proposes will be met with resistance and gridlock once presented to the House and Senate, where Republicans are well represented, just as anything Bush proposes is currently met with similar resistance by the Democrats in the House and Senate.How many times do i have to sing this song.....Meet the new Boss....Same as the old Boss......


And that is the truth, LW, but the absence of decency in the Democratic Party doesn't equate to the presence of decency in the Republican party....

Incidentally, to all those who argue with the LP's position to remove minimum wage: I'd be working right now if it weren't for the fact that many of the local employers can't afford to take me on....I'd frankly rather be working at $3 an hour than not at all.

on Sep 01, 2004
Gideon, you need to expand your Yuletide listening. I accept that the Band Aid effort was well intended, but a great song - I think not. (Oh, and the answer to the question in the title? No, actually they didn't - most of them were not Christians.)


Nope...personally, although I am a Christian, I can't stand Christmas. My listing of yuletide songs is actually more diverse than most. Some of my favs:

Merry Christmas (I don't want to fight).....the Ramones
Fairy Tale of New York...the Pogues
Father Christmas....the Kinks

You won't find those in many church hymnals....lol

But as to the end, that wasn't the point...the point was to think of others outside yourself.
2 Pages1 2