The journey from there to here

I find white supremacists to be a pretty despicable lot, all in all. I really wish there was a way to boot these people off the planet, frankly.

But if I were in Ron Paul's shoes, I would be doing precisely what he's doing.

Paul, one of the pack of GOP Presidential candidates, has received heavy criticism for a $500 campaign donation from a white supremacist. He has been pressed to return it, but says he will keep it. Although I support Paul, I will concede that his spin on why he is keeping it is kind of amusing, but be that as it may, he has a point.

I do not believe that campaign donations, provided they come from legitimate donors, should be the subject of undue scrutiny. It is very possible for a candidate to hold many similar views with someone who is utterly reprehensible, but not share an allegiance with the underlying ideology. The issues that Paul and this white supremacist have in common are not race issues, but border control and small government issues.

If Paul was speaking at white supremacist rallies, I would feel differently. There's a big difference between courting someone's vote and accepting a campaign donation. And it doesn't matter whether it's Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, or Green, I believe your vote should be guided by the candidate's stance on the issues, not who slipped money into their bank account. And, to their credit, given the minimal coverage this has gotten on blog sites, I think it's reasonable to assume I'm not alone in my thinking.

The donor who slipped Ron Paul the money has not, to my knowledge, done anything that would merit his loss of freedom of speech or of association. He simply made a donation to a candidate he favors, and there isn't anything in the world wrong with that.


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Dec 21, 2007
He can have the Neonazi vote or mine.


So you are, quite literally, saying that you give the neonazis power to decide your vote. Wow, Leauki. You give them FAR more power than the average American does.

Do I not have the same right to be against Ron Paul as the Nazis have to be for him?


Oh, absolutely. But to do so BECAUSE you won't support anyone who has ANYTHING in common with neo nazis seems a tad absurd.

I assume Ron Paul had absolutely no idea with whom he was shaking hands here? (See pictures.)


Are you aware of how many people a politician shakes hands with in the course of a campaign?

And actually, on the issue of individual rights, there is only dispute by those who don't respect the Constitution. Because the Constitution enumerates individual rights pretty clearly, Leauki.

on Dec 21, 2007

By the way, Leauki, did you miss previous comments by LW on this issue where she said that her ex husband would give money to candidates he didn't like just to watch them squirm?

Don't always assume everything is what it appears to be.

If you can show me that a majority of white supremacists support Paul, or show me Paul speaking at one of their conventions or a standing membership in such a convention, I will agree he might need to rethink his positions. But as long as Paul stands for smaller government, fewer taxes, and border control, don't assume that because SOME white supremacists share that view, he is one of them.

2 Pages1 2